Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)HealthCare.gov pricing feature can be off the mark [View all]
(CBS News) CBS News has uncovered a serious pricing problem with HealthCare.gov. It stems from the Obama administration's efforts to improve its health care website. A new online feature can dramatically underestimate the cost of insurance.
The administration announced it would provide a new "shop and browse" feature Sunday, but it's not giving consumers the real picture. In some cases, people could end up paying double of what they see on the website, CBS News' Jan Crawford reported Wednesday on "CBS This Morning."
As President Obama promises to fix HealthCare.gov, his administration is touting what it calls "improvements" in design, specifically a feature that allows you to "See Plans Now." White House press secretary Jay Carney has said, "Americans across the country can type in their zip code and shop and browse."
But CBS News has learned the new "shop and browse" feature often comes with the wrong price tags.
The administration announced it would provide a new "shop and browse" feature Sunday, but it's not giving consumers the real picture. In some cases, people could end up paying double of what they see on the website, CBS News' Jan Crawford reported Wednesday on "CBS This Morning."
As President Obama promises to fix HealthCare.gov, his administration is touting what it calls "improvements" in design, specifically a feature that allows you to "See Plans Now." White House press secretary Jay Carney has said, "Americans across the country can type in their zip code and shop and browse."
But CBS News has learned the new "shop and browse" feature often comes with the wrong price tags.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505269_162-57608843/healthcare.gov-pricing-feature-can-be-off-the-mark/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
145 replies, 10104 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Failure is not an option as we won't be able to delay the individual mandate for political reasons
dkf
Oct 2013
#11
Let me add a different scenario, in addition to the technical problems
Puzzledtraveller
Oct 2013
#20
Yes I think it's a mess but D's will have to live with it, like vets in the VA system.
dkf
Oct 2013
#27
Yes. We can't let this fail, and criticisms of those who are saying we need to get urgent about this
Yo_Mama
Oct 2013
#58
Any price quote should be honored. Even if that means the federal government covering the difference
Gravitycollapse
Oct 2013
#2
So you admit you disagree with the vast majority here....yet you continue to hang around and force
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#9
Unfortunately they aren't a small minority. Vocal yes, but unfortunately not small n/t
progree
Oct 2013
#16
"I don't go around griefing..." Some of us choose not to be ostriches. Some of us want to know
progree
Oct 2013
#68
Ostrich? Hardly.....I am well informed....thank you...this is Democratic Underground...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#76
Giving a 64 year old the rate of a 50 year old is not "off" to you????????????? half the rate is
progree
Oct 2013
#89
Would you say the same thing if it was a Republican admin "misunderestimating" its costs
progree
Oct 2013
#94
Seems to me the recent swarm of corporate sockbots is here to stop the general movement to the left
Zorra
Oct 2013
#92
I just think people should know about this problem so they aren't blindsided at the office
progree
Oct 2013
#98
Look up there on the top left....see what that says? Democratic Underground...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#28
"states the actual prices could be lower, but it makes no mention that they could be higher"
progree
Oct 2013
#5
I thought the quote it gives was merely an estimate. The Corporate Media is reaching!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2013
#13
All the Obama haters out in full force pretending to be fair minded.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2013
#17
I'm an Obama admirer and worked very hard to get him elected. So stop lying about me.
progree
Oct 2013
#18
So you are saying people are too stupid to understand "average prices"?
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#40
thats where an average price comes in....you do realize this involves HUNDREDS of plans...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#52
these are averages....Do you not understand AVERAGES....and these are quotes...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#78
Your "figures" do NOT include the tax credit...that is WHY it COULD be lower...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#136
In Rochester, MN there are a whole lot of plans, but all from one and only one insurance co.
progree
Oct 2013
#122
If this was some Republican program, and they were grossly underestimating their cost "estimates"
progree
Oct 2013
#23
Fine, but I still don't get how it is a "bit silly" for the media to report on it
progree
Oct 2013
#36
Because it is clearly a quick and temporary insert while they get things going...
Demo_Chris
Oct 2013
#101
If the contractor gave you a 1/3 to 1/2 off estimate to get their foot in the door?
progree
Oct 2013
#45
I doubt low income people or those with pre-existing conditions are paying more under ACA.
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#35
Taxpayers will be picking up the subidies; rates will increase due to high-cost patients in the pool
FarCenter
Oct 2013
#46
Assuming the "non-patients", i.e. the healthy young, sign up in sufficient numbers. We shall see. nt
progree
Oct 2013
#50
Do you have any data that these are the young and healthy ones? I suspect, aside from the just
progree
Oct 2013
#62
No. Some people think it is a problem when healthcare.gov is estimating a 49 yo based on a 27 yo
progree
Oct 2013
#86
Okay Ostrich...you would rather have the current Heathcare system...duly noted.
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#88
"Okay Ostrich.you would rather have the current Heathcare system...duly noted." OK Liar
progree
Oct 2013
#97
Show me anywhere I said or indicated the old system is better, or that I don't want the ACA to work.
progree
Oct 2013
#124
It was a simple question, I'm sorry if simple questions are "word salad" to you, Sarah n/t
progree
Oct 2013
#82
The "non-patients" are the former uninsured getting the high subsidies from the taxpayers.
FarCenter
Oct 2013
#51
Not true....But I suppose it is much cheaper for the uninsured to just go to the emergency room
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#57
I'm willing to pay a bit more to expand coverage to 30 million. But from what I've seen so far,
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#54