General Discussion

pintobean

(18,101 posts)

22. Ironic. /nt

Reply to Bluenorthwest (Reply #19)

Thu Oct 17, 2013, 09:00 AM

Oct 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Expletive-laden OP's get lots of recs but are not productive [View all] Flying Squirrel Oct 2013 OP

meh. grownups arent turned away because of a few words. scheming daemons Oct 2013 #1

But search engines are, and web filters are too. DU gets filtered as a domain, not page by page. Coyotl Oct 2013 #37

If they're getting "recs" Le Taz Hot Oct 2013 #2

There is definitely a point of overload quinnox Oct 2013 #3

As I told someone once "I'm so fornicating happy I could just defecate" hobbit709 Oct 2013 #4

lol. a public "shaming" cali Oct 2013 #5

I thought the OP was stated rather politely Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #6

"a bit rude" is rather polite, as well pintobean Oct 2013 #8

it's a call out. Of me. cali Oct 2013 #9

Haha! RiffRandell Oct 2013 #42

Damn fucking straight! demwing Oct 2013 #7

I Don't Think You Thought This Through ProfessorGAC Oct 2013 #10

I presume you're talking about the thread which aims the profanity at freepers and tea-partiers muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #11

DU is not intended to be a harbor for Republicans and independents according to admin Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #32

Never ever read the Rude Pundit... trumad Oct 2013 #12

The kind of people who are would leave this board over language CBGLuthier Oct 2013 #13

The profanity is merely a symptom Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #14

pish posh. codswallop. nonsense. cali Oct 2013 #15

I wasn't referring to your OP in particular, though this thread seems to. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #17

The SOP of GD says 'no whining about DU' but these Meta type OPs continue to Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #20

So I'm sinning? Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #21

No, you and the OP are claiming others are flawed, harming our 'cause' and being angry Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #23

I know what the OP wrote. I also know what I wrote and it has nothing to do with Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #27

That bit of religion, that's YOUR religion, not mine. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #29

The citation wasn't about religion; it was about irony, and it still seems quite apt. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #33

You mad, bro? Lololol. Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #39

I dunno... sendero Oct 2013 #16

Yeah! Hell-damn-fart! Orrex Oct 2013 #18

What a load of self important ego bleating. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #19

Ironic. /nt pintobean Oct 2013 #22

Got a point to make, make it. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #25

I think pinto bean is saying you are also a control Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #40

Yes pintobean Oct 2013 #43

I see no reason to believe it would turn off more than it would bring in fishwax Oct 2013 #24

People will rec anything Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #26

Many people on this site don't like moderate republicans, if there are any left. Some on bluestate10 Oct 2013 #28

I like 'em. Iggo Oct 2013 #30

In general, I think it shows a lack of writing ability. randome Oct 2013 #31

Shakespeare was very profane. Vonnegut used to write 'Why don't you take a Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #34

Oh, it can be done with style, I don't disagree with that. randome Oct 2013 #36

Lol, I would suggest you trash the thread if it bothers you! Like I am going... Logical Oct 2013 #35

I do not give a fuck about no-count Republicans Generic Other Oct 2013 #38

I don't swear just for the hell of it WilliamPitt Oct 2013 #41

There's an English professor in the office next to mine who's offended by my "cursing." Gidney N Cloyd Oct 2013 #44