Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 09:44 AM Aug 2013

What would be the most likely consequences of U.S. Military Strikes in Syrian? [View all]


9 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
It would tip the balance in favor of the rebels enough so that they could topple the Assad regime and establish a better government
0 (0%)
It would have very little actual long term impact one way or the other
0 (0%)
It would only strengthen the resolve of both the government forces and the rebel forces thus leading to even more bloodletting.
0 (0%)
It would tip the balance enough to topple the Assad regime – but a long term and protracted civil war will continue.
0 (0%)
It wouldn’t change the final outcome but it would created a deterrence against any future use of chemical weapons.
0 (0%)
It would tip the balance enough to topple the Assad government – but a fundamentalist Islamist government or another totalitarian state will replace it.
1 (11%)
It would be an enormous gamble and there is no telling what the result would be
8 (89%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A concerted effort could knock off Assad's government Scootaloo Aug 2013 #1
it would not be easy to knock off the Assad regime. But if the U.S. commits itself to airstrikes Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #9
Dead innocents. Iggo Aug 2013 #2
That, and terrorist recruits. n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #16
It will accelerate the process of igniting a wider regional war, with the US a target from multiple leveymg Aug 2013 #3
Regional war, or worse.... Junkdrawer Aug 2013 #6
No "Best Case Scenario"......Worst Case: Dubya Dubya Three LongTomH Aug 2013 #14
More profit for the MIC. RC Aug 2013 #4
No option for "other" dixiegrrrrl Aug 2013 #5
Partitioning may be necessary. moondust Aug 2013 #15
dead Syrians, MIC profits KG Aug 2013 #7
Higher profits for petroleum corporations as gasoline climbs past $5.00 a gallon Coyotl Aug 2013 #8
See our glorious victories in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan for clues. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2013 #10
A lot of dead people, cpwm17 Aug 2013 #11
Power vacuum. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #12
Throwing more oily rags and matches into a conflicted region of the planet??? NightWatcher Aug 2013 #13
$6/gallon gas. Myrina Aug 2013 #17
Once the US and other powers take a hand, they will escalate if they don't get the result they want kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #18
I agree. Limited strikes will not change anything. Which means ever increasing intervention is Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #19
one more Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #20
It would open up Iran for attack. Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #21
another kick for another day Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #22
One more step towards Iran nadinbrzezinski Aug 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be the most li...