Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
102. and here's the full commission report
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 09:37 PM
Aug 2013

Last edited Sat Aug 24, 2013, 04:49 PM - Edit history (1)

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/library/studies/nc/ncmenu.htm

...criminal law is too harsh a tool to apply to personal possession even in the effort to discourage use. It implies an overwhelming indictment of the behavior which we believe is not appropriate. The actual and potential harm of use of the drug is not great enough to justify intrusion by the criminal law into private behavior, a step which our society takes only 'with the greatest reluctance.


When the issue was brought up again, in regard to medical marijuana, the DEA's own judge, Francis Young, said -

"In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death. Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care.:

Source: US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, "In the Matter of Marijuana Rescheduling Petition," [Docket #86-22], (September 6, 1988), p. 57.
More hope and change? Blue_In_AK Aug 2013 #1
the war on drugs is needed to help justify the militarization of the police drhobo Aug 2013 #6
Yep, same with the "War on Terror" used to justify the shredding of the 4th amendment. n/t Daniel537 Aug 2013 #21
Senate Sub-committee report: The war on drugs is a racket RainDog Aug 2013 #39
The 'corrections industry' would collapse... Blanks Aug 2013 #48
No hope for change. progressoid Aug 2013 #38
We were just giving the hope that things would change not the change. Lint Head Aug 2013 #127
Barack Obama is wrong about this, and he deserves scorn for his continued position. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #2
He is a Hypocrite! Phlem Aug 2013 #53
Change isn't coming....it's here. Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #3
damn right it's here. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #176
the alcohol peddlers & DEA's bloated bureaucracy rejoice nt msongs Aug 2013 #4
Obviously, as a former doper himself... malthaussen Aug 2013 #5
heh. SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #36
Surprise, surprise, surprise. nt City Lights Aug 2013 #7
Just in...Dorritos parent company stock dives. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #8
. bunnies Aug 2013 #9
This is v disappointing. nt LaydeeBug Aug 2013 #10
I'm so pissed off right now, I can't even think of anything to say except cuss words. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #11
And no change in my attitude towards the administration is coming. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #12
How can that be true? AmyStrange Aug 2013 #13
Consistent. Bonobo Aug 2013 #99
ha ha AmyStrange Aug 2013 #106
Sleight of hand pscot Aug 2013 #111
Which one do I look at? Which one do I look at? Bonobo Aug 2013 #113
Not a change in law, a change in the approach to prosecution. MH1 Aug 2013 #103
Question M... AmyStrange Aug 2013 #110
I've wondered about this too RainDog Aug 2013 #121
Very well said... AmyStrange Aug 2013 #122
Intriguing thought, but I don't think so. MH1 Aug 2013 #158
Didn't they bypass that whole process with alcohol prohibition? AmyStrange Aug 2013 #163
. . . Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #14
Time for Congress to Step Up RainDog Aug 2013 #15
+1 SunSeeker Aug 2013 #68
Somewhere tonight there will be a $5,000.00 bottle of Pinot Noir opened. Socal31 Aug 2013 #17
We're jumping the gun. Billy Pilgrim Aug 2013 #18
yeah, right. I believe Holder about as far as I can throw him. liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #20
Holder has supported sentencing reform RainDog Aug 2013 #22
He is always impotent unless something positive happens Marrah_G Aug 2013 #25
LOL n/t RainDog Aug 2013 #28
... SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #143
Oh bullshit burnodo Aug 2013 #37
Obviously marsis Aug 2013 #152
Wrong. The Justice Department has the authority to seek rescheduling. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2013 #40
In case you don't know the history, Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #41
If that's true, well, that's sad Billy Pilgrim Aug 2013 #98
I'm not sure if it was Nixon who really got the War on Drugs rolling Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #170
I'm talking about the "official" version Le Taz Hot Aug 2013 #174
I admit, I wasn't really paying attention to the drug war under Nixon Art_from_Ark Aug 2013 #179
Eric Holder's "support" couldn't hold up a helium-filled balloon. winter is coming Aug 2013 #69
I think that the administration could change marijuana classification by itself cali Aug 2013 #132
I'M SHOCKED, SHOCKED I SAY!!!!! Daniel537 Aug 2013 #19
Why can't he just order a study on the medical uses or something? napoleon_in_rags Aug 2013 #23
Obama could instruct Holder to have the DEA reclassify RainDog Aug 2013 #26
lol! Poor Nixon. My apologies. napoleon_in_rags Aug 2013 #74
Nixon refused to take the advice of the best experts RainDog Aug 2013 #101
And back my impression of Nixon goes... Great stuff. napoleon_in_rags Aug 2013 #105
LOLOL RainDog Aug 2013 #108
Nixon actually appeared on Laugh-In... AmyStrange Aug 2013 #131
What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob, what is the matter with them? RainDog Aug 2013 #151
It's all about shaking your jowels while you say it.. napoleon_in_rags Aug 2013 #165
and here's the full commission report RainDog Aug 2013 #102
It was a kind of bait and switch... Catch 22... one of those things AmyStrange Aug 2013 #114
yeah, that was Nixon's "out" to ignore the recommendation RainDog Aug 2013 #126
And talk about Catch 22, having to get the NIDA's approval before you can do medical research... AmyStrange Aug 2013 #130
yeah, I'm familiar with his change of mind RainDog Aug 2013 #135
The administration supports MMJ in legal states. nt tridim Aug 2013 #44
Based on what evidence? n/t theaocp Aug 2013 #75
The thousands of legally operating dispensaries with no Fed intervention at all. tridim Aug 2013 #139
DEA Continues Crackdown on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries napoleon_in_rags Aug 2013 #83
Sure it does, that's why it's persecuting all of the largest, best run, and most transparent Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #84
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #124
Nothing at all. To even suggest such a thing would be be so cynical as to border on traitorous. Egalitarian Thug Aug 2013 #125
it does NOT. That is a complete falsehood. you have a lot of nerve to say that shit. cali Aug 2013 #133
^ Every one of these responses is a lie. tridim Aug 2013 #138
This is BULLSHIT RainDog Aug 2013 #142
So the thousands of legally operating dispensaries with no fed intervention at all aren't real? tridim Aug 2013 #144
LOL RainDog Aug 2013 #147
Do we really need to give you a dictionary definition of "supports"? DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #156
It does not- no matter how many times you repeat that ludicrous claim cali Aug 2013 #148
That's an obvious-on-its-face lie. DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #155
Because Pharma wouldn't like it dflprincess Aug 2013 #104
It's a good thing he didn't get caught when he was younger Marrah_G Aug 2013 #24
you said it best olddots Aug 2013 #29
Wonder how he would address that question should it be asked of him. SammyWinstonJack Aug 2013 #149
Of course not. That would be actual "change," instead of bullshit lip service villager Aug 2013 #27
Droolingly stupid. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #30
welcome to my ignore list. Phlem Aug 2013 #61
Welcome to my ignore list. Ed Suspicious Aug 2013 #76
"White House says" Mojo Electro Aug 2013 #31
Cowards RandiFan1290 Aug 2013 #32
The Figis have full access to MMJ in their state. Zero Federal intervention. nt tridim Aug 2013 #43
There's lots of places with legal MMJ and plenty of Federal intervention. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #47
And Holder has prosecuted the dispensary that supplies this mmj RainDog Aug 2013 #95
the feds might consider not throwing terminally ill people in prison for smoking pot, for now Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #128
Just rolling out the stupid today, aren't they? n/t Hydra Aug 2013 #33
This administration seriously sucks. nt Demo_Chris Aug 2013 #34
Which is another lie burnodo Aug 2013 #35
I heard a distinct, "At this point" in the quote. tridim Aug 2013 #42
"At the point" means RainDog Aug 2013 #46
No, it means there is no change at this point. AKA today. tridim Aug 2013 #56
Oh please Caretha Aug 2013 #63
Exactly. Billy Pilgrim Aug 2013 #66
It is realistic to expect Holder to weigh in on legalization in CO and WA RainDog Aug 2013 #97
Jared Polis has repeatedly asked the admin to weigh in RainDog Aug 2013 #67
As I just stated, the admin is already discussing CO and WA. tridim Aug 2013 #140
Polis is complaining that Holder has failed to provide legislators information RainDog Aug 2013 #146
I'm not falling for that after the elections crap again. Obama can't be re-elected and Holder is liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #86
We heard the same shit about the 2012 elections! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #109
I believe I read this poster post exactly that about exactly this. After 2012... be patient! n/t cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #117
Yes it will occur after 2012. tridim Aug 2013 #141
I think it changed after November 2012. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #145
Right -- they'll do it in the next term. Oh, wait . . . n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #115
To be fair, Congress makes the laws LearningCurve Aug 2013 #45
Another issue where electoral politics defines morality burnodo Aug 2013 #49
Why not force the libertarians to see Republicans in action, then? RainDog Aug 2013 #50
Exactly. Why doesn't Rand Paul introduce some legislation? nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #70
he's probably against it burnodo Aug 2013 #73
Nope. Why do you think Rand Paul is now against it? nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #79
Republicans, including Paul, introduced hemp legislation RainDog Aug 2013 #80
It only allows nonnarcotic industrial hemp, and it does not appear to be going anywhere. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #88
so he only wants hemp legalized? burnodo Aug 2013 #90
oh yeah, Paul is an ass RainDog Aug 2013 #92
Agreed. Both Pauls are asses. nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #93
yeah, but the administration could change classification which would make a cali Aug 2013 #134
Hope for Change in one hand and shit in the other CBGLuthier Aug 2013 #51
facepalm... Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #52
I am not surprised gopiscrap Aug 2013 #54
I remember when he lost the majority in congress Phlem Aug 2013 #55
That is just about the dumbest thing I've ever seen posted on DU. tridim Aug 2013 #58
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #60
Napoleon was right after all warrprayer Aug 2013 #57
No hope. No change. MNBrewer Aug 2013 #59
I didn't really expect change on that particular subject. Rex Aug 2013 #62
Why not? Lots of privately owned prisons to fill? Matariki Aug 2013 #64
After the CNN documentary sorefeet Aug 2013 #65
I agree. We all know this medicine helps people. If Obama doesn't know that by now he is liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #120
so done with this administration. whats hillarys stance btw? Garion_55 Aug 2013 #71
My first stop on positional questions for candidates. Chan790 Aug 2013 #81
blah. Garion_55 Aug 2013 #85
Well, it's not like he campaigned on CHANGE or anything. NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #72
Did Obama campaign on legalizing pot? SunSeeker Aug 2013 #77
He may as well have. that promise would have been as good as any of the others. nt NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #78
Really? He didn't end the war in Iraq? SunSeeker Aug 2013 #82
Really? NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #87
I'm glad the war in Iraq is over and my brother will finally be insured. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #91
About ending the war in Iraq. Bonobo Aug 2013 #100
Obama never "wanted to keep the troops in Iraq." He was always against the war. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #116
That's because he didn't campaign on it LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #154
When CA finally legalizes pot, then it will reach unstoppable momentum. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #157
Prop 19 failed for a variety of reasons RainDog Aug 2013 #162
The main reason is the stoner & youth vote did not come out big time. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #167
Jeff Mirons, who has studied this issue, disagrees with you RainDog Aug 2013 #168
Jeff Miron is a East Coast prof working for the Cato Institute. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #172
He's an economics professor at Harvard RainDog Aug 2013 #180
My intitial reaction, without looking at the replies, is: snappyturtle Aug 2013 #89
disappointing. I hope... one_voice Aug 2013 #94
Legalization reduces highway traffic fatalities. Why would we want that? Nt. Warren Stupidity Aug 2013 #96
LOL, another idiotic decision. Stay progressive Obama! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #107
But, it's ok that President Obama did it when he was young and mucifer Aug 2013 #112
A really good "investigative reporter" would track down EVERY member of "The Choom Gang" and cherokeeprogressive Aug 2013 #118
Bleh. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #119
Well, fuck him then. appal_jack Aug 2013 #123
And another missleading headline Egnever Aug 2013 #129
What was said is this: the Cole memo is in place, still RainDog Aug 2013 #136
Vast bureaucracies and billions of dollars don't or didn't depend on keeping gay marriage illegal Fumesucker Aug 2013 #137
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #153
Explain how! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #160
Wrong place for my post. MineralMan Aug 2013 #150
Damn! In_The_Wind Aug 2013 #159
Well, of course not! blackspade Aug 2013 #161
yet, a Denver LEA claims mmj saved them from the recession RainDog Aug 2013 #164
EXACTLY! blackspade Aug 2013 #166
Is this guy going to change ANYTHING before his 8 years are up? davidn3600 Aug 2013 #169
Hope for Change? DisgustipatedinCA Aug 2013 #178
I've long ran out of reasons to defend the corporate wing of the Democratic Party. livingwagenow Aug 2013 #171
He will find out soon, it's not up to him! B Calm Aug 2013 #173
THANK GOD! Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #175
Prohibition is a failed public policy...again. nt TeamPooka Aug 2013 #177
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No change in marijuana la...»Reply #102