Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

2. The ruling basically flags the policy for change, but

Reply to X_Digger (Reply #1)

Mon Aug 12, 2013, 10:42 AM

Aug 2013

Last edited Mon Aug 12, 2013, 12:56 PM - Edit history (1)

acknowledges that a number of other dependent policies have to be revised to comply. This is likely the basis for putting the department under supervision.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge throws out NYPD "stop-and-frisk" policy, places department under court supervision [View all] ProSense Aug 2013 OP

I think the kossack is overreaching a bit X_Digger Aug 2013 #1

The ruling basically flags the policy for change, but ProSense Aug 2013 #2

Agreed, and it will depend on how much power the 'oversight' person has. X_Digger Aug 2013 #4

Good for the judge, but knowing the NYPD they will ignore it. Kelly believes he and Bloomberg sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #3

Hopefully this ends Obama's promotion of Kelly as "well qualified" to run Homeland Security kenny blankenship Aug 2013 #10

Kelly is a thug. It's hard to believe anyone would consider him for anything. He runs one of the sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #11

Has not the name of one of those "arrogant, swaggering morons" been mentioned as a possible indepat Aug 2013 #28

It has been mentioned. I am hoping it was merely a rumor. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #30

Great news malaise Aug 2013 #5

A rec and a kick for prosense! This is great news! n-t Logical Aug 2013 #6

Good news. But gee ProSense, are you actually happy that a fascist policy got thrown out? Downtown Hound Aug 2013 #7

Others are happy that the judicial is now the new executive. Igel Aug 2013 #13

Federal courts have always been able to make rulings based on the U.S. Constitution. WinkyDink Aug 2013 #15

Only if it were someone Obama had appointed. lark Aug 2013 #16

Nice...you won't even cut ProSense a break for something MineralMan Aug 2013 #26

I thought it was funny myself Downtown Hound Aug 2013 #32

Too bad you pissed on your on post by throwing a stupid personal attack at ProSense. Cha Aug 2013 #34

I believe that is in the eye of the beholder. n/t Downtown Hound Aug 2013 #36

That is great! ljm2002 Aug 2013 #8

I'm sure Bloomberg will find a way to ignore this. MicaelS Aug 2013 #9

Bloomberg has already been on TV responding .... oldhippie Aug 2013 #21

The judge has not ordered an end to the practice... markpkessinger Aug 2013 #22

Yeah, NYPD has stretched Terry v. Ohio beyond all reasonableness. X_Digger Aug 2013 #23

Rec. The Link Aug 2013 #12

K & R Scurrilous Aug 2013 #14

Is this judge related Spirochete Aug 2013 #17

No, she is not related to Judge Judy... markpkessinger Aug 2013 #18

Just wondered Spirochete Aug 2013 #31

lol woolldog Aug 2013 #27

A good first step but will be appealed. CK_John Aug 2013 #19

Good ruling, but the judge has not "thrown out" stop-and-frisk markpkessinger Aug 2013 #20

Here's another article about another S&F case ruled on by this judge.. X_Digger Aug 2013 #24

Good ruling. About time, too. nt MineralMan Aug 2013 #25

I'm happy about this. bravenak Aug 2013 #29

Great news. We'll see if the arch-Prohibitionist will comply. Eleanors38 Aug 2013 #33

Ari Melber Tweets on Stop and Frisk ruling.. Cha Aug 2013 #35