General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm starting to wonder... [View all]Xyzse
(8,217 posts)The debate is a good thing.
I just don't know if the way he presented the information is a net positive or negative due to his initial exagerrations, by doing so, makes some of his disclosures suspect and creates far more speculation than needed, which makes it harder to sift through it all.
I mean, I don't trust whatever the government will say in regards to denials. However, since they haven't denied the program's existence. They did mention that it is well known in congress and they have been briefed. They also mentioned some of the terms of it. I just think it should be discussed more in terms of the actual program than the personalities and what has been said. So that it is more of a factual accounting.
I guess it took off the heat on the other supposed "scandals" like the IRS, Benghazi and others, which I guess could be considered a positive, but it just propagates this sensationalism that is counter productive.