Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
9. This is hardly an indictment of 'nutritional science'. It's an indictment of the food industry.
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 02:44 PM
Apr 2013

The fact that the food industry uses bad science and misleading advertising to sell their shit should come as no surprise to anybody.

It's a shame that government doesn't do it's duty and actually regulate the misleading statements made by food companies. For example, the 'No trans-fat' promotion on the front of Coffee-Mate creamer, when in fact, Coffee-Mate is primarily made from trans-fat. But because of sloppy regulation and misleading portion size, Coffee-Mate can claim it has No trans-fat because it contains less than 1gr of trans-fat per serving.

The fact that science is continually proposing and rejecting hypotheses isn't a rejection of science either. It's pretty much the definition of how real scientific investigation is supposed to work. Unlike the pseudo-science of the right-wing, who propose a theory and simply rejects any contradictory evidence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Apparently antioxidants a...»Reply #9