Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Solar panels could destroy U.S. utilities, according to U.S. utilities [View all]green for victory
(591 posts)97. Take a look at Palo Verde Nuclear plant in Arizona
and the land it sits on.
full resolution fills your screen
The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant located in Tonopah, Arizona,[1] about 45 miles (80 km) west of central Phoenix. It is the largest nuclear generation facility in the United States, averaging over 3.3 gigawatts (GW) of electrical power production in 2008[1] to serve approximately 4 million people. Arizona Public Service (APS) owns 29.1% of the station and operates the facility. Other owners include Salt River Project (17.5%), El Paso Electric Co. (15.8%), Southern California Edison (15.8%), PNM Resources (10.2%), Southern California Public Power Authority (5.9%), and the Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power (5.7%).[2]
Located in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not situated adjacent to a large body of above-ground water. The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs.
The facility is on 4,000 acres (1,600 ha) of land and consists of three Combustion Engineering pressurized water reactors, each with an original capacity of 1.27 gigawatts electrical, current (2007) maximum capacity of 1.24 gigawatts electrical,[3] and typical operating capacity 70%95% of this. The plant is a major source of power for Phoenix and Southern California, capable of serving about 4 million people. The plant provides about 35% of the electricity generated in Arizona each year. The plant was fully operational by 1988, taking twelve years to build and costing $5.9 billion,[4] eventually employing 2,386 people.[5] The plant employs 2,055 full-time on-site workers.
Located in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not situated adjacent to a large body of above-ground water. The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs.
The facility is on 4,000 acres (1,600 ha) of land and consists of three Combustion Engineering pressurized water reactors, each with an original capacity of 1.27 gigawatts electrical, current (2007) maximum capacity of 1.24 gigawatts electrical,[3] and typical operating capacity 70%95% of this. The plant is a major source of power for Phoenix and Southern California, capable of serving about 4 million people. The plant provides about 35% of the electricity generated in Arizona each year. The plant was fully operational by 1988, taking twelve years to build and costing $5.9 billion,[4] eventually employing 2,386 people.[5] The plant employs 2,055 full-time on-site workers.
The Nuclear plants will take land too. The difference is the Solar plants won't contaminate the soil for 30,000 years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Solar panels could destroy U.S. utilities, according to U.S. utilities [View all]
green for victory
Apr 2013
OP
Yeah, I was suddenly overcome by a wave of depression on reading that.
Jackpine Radical
Apr 2013
#52
As a brand new investor in 24 solar panels on our roof , selling sunshine back to SCE..
pkdu
Apr 2013
#82
They will be responsible for their own demise if they ignore solar energy.
LiberalFighter
Apr 2013
#4
About the first thing Raygun did upon occupying the WH was to remove Carter's solar panels on the
byeya
Apr 2013
#7
Exactly... I find it odd that if they think solar will win, why aren't they investing in it?
octothorpe
Apr 2013
#48
All of the major energy companies are controlled by a common financial royalty.
AdHocSolver
Apr 2013
#58
Thanks for sharing this information. I wish someone would do a graphic to make it easy to share.
BrotherIvan
Apr 2013
#68
imagine the power of a Wiki-Solar project- everyone that wants contributes
green for victory
Apr 2013
#19
If photovoltaics are feasible in Germany it is feasible in most of the U.S.
yellowcanine
Apr 2013
#12
I guess we should prepare for the rise of the mandated solar insurance industry, then.
bluedigger
Apr 2013
#18
There's plenty of solar companies (especially here in So. Cal.) that will do it for no money down.
SunSeeker
Apr 2013
#42
I am not surprised but happy to note the Democrats has been in the right side of alternative
Thinkingabout
Apr 2013
#34
I don't remember where I got this link. This link might have a bearing on this question.
RickFromMN
Apr 2013
#102
Strictly speaking the demand curve is reflects whatever load is placed on the grid
wtmusic
Apr 2013
#113
I really really don't want to see the utility companies owning "solar rights".
djean111
Apr 2013
#45
Ah, got it. Another westerner here, I know exactly what you're saying.
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2013
#59
Germany has managed to figure it out. If we can't, maybe we could hire a few Germans
green for victory
Apr 2013
#95