Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

green for victory

(591 posts)
97. Take a look at Palo Verde Nuclear plant in Arizona
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 01:12 AM
Apr 2013

and the land it sits on.



full resolution fills your screen

The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant located in Tonopah, Arizona,[1] about 45 miles (80 km) west of central Phoenix. It is the largest nuclear generation facility in the United States, averaging over 3.3 gigawatts (GW) of electrical power production in 2008[1] to serve approximately 4 million people. Arizona Public Service (APS) owns 29.1% of the station and operates the facility. Other owners include Salt River Project (17.5%), El Paso Electric Co. (15.8%), Southern California Edison (15.8%), PNM Resources (10.2%), Southern California Public Power Authority (5.9%), and the Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power (5.7%).[2]

Located in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not situated adjacent to a large body of above-ground water. The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs.

The facility is on 4,000 acres (1,600 ha) of land and consists of three Combustion Engineering pressurized water reactors, each with an original capacity of 1.27 gigawatts electrical, current (2007) maximum capacity of 1.24 gigawatts electrical,[3] and typical operating capacity 70%–95% of this. The plant is a major source of power for Phoenix and Southern California, capable of serving about 4 million people. The plant provides about 35% of the electricity generated in Arizona each year. The plant was fully operational by 1988, taking twelve years to build and costing $5.9 billion,[4] eventually employing 2,386 people.[5] The plant employs 2,055 full-time on-site workers.


The Nuclear plants will take land too. The difference is the Solar plants won't contaminate the soil for 30,000 years.
Bummer.. pipoman Apr 2013 #1
Yeah, I was suddenly overcome by a wave of depression on reading that. Jackpine Radical Apr 2013 #52
Ten reasons solar energy is all wrong: wellspring Apr 2013 #73
*snort* krispos42 Apr 2013 #74
As a brand new investor in 24 solar panels on our roof , selling sunshine back to SCE.. pkdu Apr 2013 #82
Yep..... That's what the oil giants want us to think..... midnight Apr 2013 #84
well played n/t w0nderer Apr 2013 #85
Love it! Tree-Hugger Apr 2013 #96
+1000. JDPriestly Apr 2013 #99
Beautiful... GTurck Apr 2013 #103
K&R And only a couple of decades too late. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #2
Corporate forces, forever standing in the way of progress. marmar Apr 2013 #3
They will be responsible for their own demise if they ignore solar energy. LiberalFighter Apr 2013 #4
We need them to be more responsible nolabels Apr 2013 #30
No, we don't need any corporations. fasttense Apr 2013 #47
We throw our money away bailing out the banks and feeding the Pentagon/CIA/DHS. leveymg Apr 2013 #5
+ a few billion green for victory Apr 2013 #6
Socialist! pscot Apr 2013 #39
And giving obscenely rich ppl MORE tax breaks and tax havens. nt valerief Apr 2013 #44
About the first thing Raygun did upon occupying the WH was to remove Carter's solar panels on the byeya Apr 2013 #7
and soon after, he abolished the Fed tax credits started by Carter green for victory Apr 2013 #10
Thanks for the reminder! byeya Apr 2013 #37
First thing Cheney did at the Veep's residence was undo Al Gore's work Hekate Apr 2013 #64
Why don't utility companies invest in Solar then? perdita9 Apr 2013 #8
Exactly... I find it odd that if they think solar will win, why aren't they investing in it? octothorpe Apr 2013 #48
All of the major energy companies are controlled by a common financial royalty. AdHocSolver Apr 2013 #58
Thanks for sharing this information. I wish someone would do a graphic to make it easy to share. BrotherIvan Apr 2013 #68
They are. Callmecrazy Apr 2013 #61
I'll bet they're all getting into water now. lexw Apr 2013 #101
Bookmarked..... daleanime Apr 2013 #9
K&R abelenkpe Apr 2013 #11
imagine the power of a Wiki-Solar project- everyone that wants contributes green for victory Apr 2013 #19
People in northern Maine have solar panels on their houses. MADem Apr 2013 #94
we people here at DU that have solar panels ThomThom Apr 2013 #75
If photovoltaics are feasible in Germany it is feasible in most of the U.S. yellowcanine Apr 2013 #12
It might work here but we would definetlyneed diversity. Arctic Dave Apr 2013 #25
Woo hoo! primavera Apr 2013 #13
They say that like it's a bad thing ... Myrina Apr 2013 #14
For them, it is. SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #17
Long overdue. Zorra Apr 2013 #15
heh. SammyWinstonJack Apr 2013 #16
I guess we should prepare for the rise of the mandated solar insurance industry, then. bluedigger Apr 2013 #18
ouch. hope this guy isn't listening green for victory Apr 2013 #21
I always assumed... onyourleft Apr 2013 #20
It won't happen soon enough. blackspade Apr 2013 #22
I could be wrong watoos Apr 2013 #27
Creating markets, as Jamie Dimon would put it. reteachinwi Apr 2013 #36
There's plenty of solar companies (especially here in So. Cal.) that will do it for no money down. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #42
Cool, Thanks! blackspade Apr 2013 #53
we are so behind in this marions ghost Apr 2013 #23
we could start turning the battleship today green for victory Apr 2013 #24
corruptisma marions ghost Apr 2013 #32
Smart power companies should be, right now, doing the following. Ready4Change Apr 2013 #26
Why not here? kyeshinka Apr 2013 #28
Yeah, and... DirtyDawg Apr 2013 #29
So? Dinosaurs went extinct too. nt bemildred Apr 2013 #31
Google Earth the place and it doesn't have a solar park there OnlinePoker Apr 2013 #33
Just happen to have a screen shot green for victory Apr 2013 #40
I am not surprised but happy to note the Democrats has been in the right side of alternative Thinkingabout Apr 2013 #34
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2013 #35
Let's see if I can find a shred of empathy or concern for the utilities... AndyA Apr 2013 #38
I have panels. My bill last month: -$5.00. nt Javaman Apr 2013 #41
How much did they cost you to install those? octothorpe Apr 2013 #49
Yeah, I'm in Austin. Javaman Apr 2013 #51
That's great - but you'd be fucked if the utilities went away, wouldn't you? wtmusic Apr 2013 #80
I know you are mr. nuke around here so I won't even qualify your Javaman Apr 2013 #83
You can't. wtmusic Apr 2013 #86
You enjoy picking fights don't you? Javaman Apr 2013 #87
No fight. wtmusic Apr 2013 #88
Yeah, you do, you just wait for people like myself to speak about solar power Javaman Apr 2013 #89
Responding with ad hominems seems like a glaring admission wtmusic Apr 2013 #91
I don't remember where I got this link. This link might have a bearing on this question. RickFromMN Apr 2013 #102
Kind of hard to evaluate 28 billion different combinations, isn't it? wtmusic Apr 2013 #107
Forgive me for being slow. I am trying to understand. RickFromMN Apr 2013 #111
Strictly speaking the demand curve is reflects whatever load is placed on the grid wtmusic Apr 2013 #113
Thank you for this link. This is fascinating. RickFromMN Apr 2013 #116
I'm going to point you to a website (one of my new favorites) wtmusic Apr 2013 #117
You enjoy reading a lot into peoples posts with zero information. Javaman Apr 2013 #104
And you enjoy telling me what I enjoy. wtmusic Apr 2013 #109
End scene. nt Javaman Apr 2013 #110
There are various ways of storing heat green for victory Apr 2013 #93
A good point. wtmusic Apr 2013 #108
What's really inexplicable is that the utility companies SheilaT Apr 2013 #43
I really really don't want to see the utility companies owning "solar rights". djean111 Apr 2013 #45
Is this a joke? n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #54
I'm not joking, although I'm being somewhat ironic. SheilaT Apr 2013 #55
Ah, got it. Another westerner here, I know exactly what you're saying. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #59
It's true==As the song says: "Nothing is Your Own" nikto Apr 2013 #115
Capitalism 4Q2u2 Apr 2013 #46
Solar farming in Iowa Skidmore Apr 2013 #50
Hearing this makes me much more resilience Hutzpa Apr 2013 #56
Panels aren't visible on Google Maps? BadgerKid Apr 2013 #57
That's sort of the point, yes. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #60
First reaction: My heart bleeds for them Hekate Apr 2013 #62
We could only wish. ileus Apr 2013 #63
In the words of Exxon's CEO: silverweb Apr 2013 #65
Good. Utilities should be managed and run by municipalities and counties. Cleita Apr 2013 #66
Let's do it and revitalize the US Power Grid nt MrScorpio Apr 2013 #67
We may have destroy the utility companies to GET the solar panels. DirkGently Apr 2013 #69
Utility company could change their business model csziggy Apr 2013 #70
YAY! grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #71
Solar's great! StoneCarver Apr 2013 #72
that's called competition in a capitalistic market fascisthunter Apr 2013 #76
Someone still has to transmit power though, right? eridani Apr 2013 #77
Germany has managed to figure it out. If we can't, maybe we could hire a few Germans green for victory Apr 2013 #95
"we could hire a few Germans": We've done it before. WinkyDink Apr 2013 #112
I am kind of bothered by the solar farm concept FrodosPet Apr 2013 #78
Take a look at Palo Verde Nuclear plant in Arizona green for victory Apr 2013 #97
I wasn't advocating for more nuclear plants FrodosPet Apr 2013 #100
But for the lack of will of the people... cbrer Apr 2013 #79
Well, they should have come up with a different EC Apr 2013 #81
A positive paradigm shift... Mr.Pain Apr 2013 #90
Doing my teency little part with my Goal Zero solar charger. AllyCat Apr 2013 #92
I have to be honest with everyone here... nikto Apr 2013 #98
start smart daybranch Apr 2013 #105
Wow... what a shame that would be Recursion Apr 2013 #106
Wait, is Grist satire? sakabatou Apr 2013 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Solar panels could destro...»Reply #97