Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
33. Sorry to be so laste responding, I hope your daughter got home in time for you
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 04:03 PM
Jan 2012

to get some sleep

He, most likely and very vaguely, mentioned he might not go after the industry because he probably needed to find out who in Congress is on the take.


Since he made the statement about there being more immorality than crime involved, he may have met with some of the Senators, both Republicans and Democrats, who were on the Committee for two years investigating the causes and who agreed that there is 'evidence of criminal activity'.

You don't show your hand until the very last moment and you don't begin serous investigations unless you're certain laws have been broken and cases are prosecutable.


True which is why it was important that he mentioned this in the SOTU. I imagine he does have more information now. Maybe from some of those US Attorneys who have been looking into the crimes.

There are also the revelations about insider trading in Congress. I would have thought that was automatically a crime, it is for everyone else. I was surprised he mentioned it in the SOTU. But today I see there is a bi-partisan effort to make it illegal.



Schneiderman is a hero. He was alone in his refusal to give in to the pressure to not prosecute sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #1
California AG, Kamala Harris, didn't bow for the sweetheart deal, either BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #6
Great, is she one of the 13 who are eventually turned it down? I had not heard of her but sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #10
Yes, she turned down the "settlement". But she has a track record BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #20
Sorry to be so laste responding, I hope your daughter got home in time for you sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #33
My ears really perked up ! This is great news! snappyturtle Jan 2012 #2
I signed that petition! Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #3
Many on DU hate moveON but sign the petition anyway Ichingcarpenter Jan 2012 #8
I don't hate MoveOn but sometimes they do really cynical stuff EFerrari Jan 2012 #15
Great news, indeed! suffragette Jan 2012 #4
The man is moving and shaking the political landscape... BeHereNow Jan 2012 #5
Thank you MoveOn and thank you OWS. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #7
MoveOn has done little but collect money. Fuck them Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #9
just a guess that you really do not read MOVEON.ORG stuff Skittles Jan 2012 #11
Yes. I do. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #12
Do not. leeroysphitz Jan 2012 #23
Do too snooper2 Jan 2012 #24
Are you calling me a liar? Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #27
No, I'm just being silly. Lighten up. n/t leeroysphitz Jan 2012 #29
YES Skittles Jan 2012 #30
Lovely. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #31
CORRECT! Skittles Jan 2012 #32
I'm not going to throw the baby out with the bath water Ichingcarpenter Jan 2012 #13
Seriously, what a nerve. EFerrari Jan 2012 #14
Hallelujah Chuuku Davis Jan 2012 #16
Yay! tavalon Jan 2012 #17
Seems like a mixed message. Turn the page??? Devil_Fish Jan 2012 #18
Yes indeed malaise Jan 2012 #19
hasnt it been said that no laws WERE broken and that's why no arrests yet? hopefully im wrong but am leftyohiolib Jan 2012 #21
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #22
I like this one Kingofalldems Jan 2012 #25
Other organizations also involved in pushing for investigations: PA Democrat Jan 2012 #26
Sounds like good news. Keeping my fingers crossed. n/t A Simple Game Jan 2012 #28
As soon as I realized Holder would be involved, I know it's just talk! dmosh42 Jan 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Wall Street inv...»Reply #33