Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)BREAKING: Hell Freezes Over !!! (Not A Climate Change Story!) [View all]
From the NY Post, Of All Places...
Adam Lanzas weapons
Last Updated: 12:28 AM, December 18, 2012
Posted: December 18, 2012
Has technology rendered the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution obsolete?
That is, has the application of modern military design to civilian firearms produced a class of weapons too dangerous to be in general circulation?
We say: Yes.
Adam Lanza broke into the Sandy Hook Elementary School last Friday morning armed with a sporting version of the US militarys principal assault weapon, plus two equally deadly handguns.
In the blink of an eye, he killed 26 people including 20 small children, all of them shot multiple times.
How many bullets did Lanza fire?
Unclear.
Did he have to pull a trigger to discharge each round?
Yes.
But the fact is that the volume of fire produced by Lanzas semi-automatic arsenal was substantively the same as the fully automatic gangster guns effectively outlawed by Congress in 1934 and again in 1968.
That ban did no real violence to the 2nd Amendment, so its hard to see how constraining the availability of high-tech military knockoffs would do so today.
Last Updated: 12:28 AM, December 18, 2012
Posted: December 18, 2012
Has technology rendered the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution obsolete?
That is, has the application of modern military design to civilian firearms produced a class of weapons too dangerous to be in general circulation?
We say: Yes.
Adam Lanza broke into the Sandy Hook Elementary School last Friday morning armed with a sporting version of the US militarys principal assault weapon, plus two equally deadly handguns.
In the blink of an eye, he killed 26 people including 20 small children, all of them shot multiple times.
How many bullets did Lanza fire?
Unclear.
Did he have to pull a trigger to discharge each round?
Yes.
But the fact is that the volume of fire produced by Lanzas semi-automatic arsenal was substantively the same as the fully automatic gangster guns effectively outlawed by Congress in 1934 and again in 1968.
That ban did no real violence to the 2nd Amendment, so its hard to see how constraining the availability of high-tech military knockoffs would do so today.
The rest: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/adam_lanza_weapons_NU2tb0tIf9hNsOCZkPJ1XP
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
36 replies, 4377 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (58)
ReplyReply to this post
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's getting late. Time for you to get back in mama's basement and stroke your gun. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2012
#16
If you know a better way of compensating for one's many inadequacies, I'd like to see it. NT
EOTE
Dec 2012
#32
What would be more effective in suppressive fire power, a belt fed machine gun or a clip fed one?
Bandit
Dec 2012
#28
Supression fire is hardly the same thing as mass murder at point-blank range.
malthaussen
Dec 2012
#29
Believe it or not a machine gun can also kill soft targets at close range in quantity
Bandit
Dec 2012
#33
Let us know when you'll be posting here with moveable type or a quill pen..
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2012
#24