Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 08:37 PM Nov 2012

Van Hollen takes Medicare age increase and Social Security off the table (updated) [View all]

Last edited Tue Nov 27, 2012, 09:45 PM - Edit history (1)

Zach Carter

Fiscal Cliff: House Democrats Close Ranks Against Social Security Cuts

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Tuesday that Social Security cuts should not be part of any deal to avert the "fiscal cliff."

Van Hollen's comments, which came during an interview with MSNBC's Tamron Hall, reveal that Democratic leaders in the House are closing ranks behind Senate leadership against cuts to the retirement program.

"With respect to Social Security, I agree with what the president has said and what (Rep.) Peter DeFazio said. Social Security is not part of the deficit and debt problem. We're not going to raid Social Security in order to balance other parts of the budget," Van Hollen said.

<....>

Earlier on Tuesday, Van Hollen told Fox News that raising the eligibility age for Medicare was not an effective way to lower the system's long-term costs. Escalating domestic health care costs, which are much higher than those of other developed nations, are a key driver of the long-term U.S. budget deficit. Many progressive lawmakers and economists have advocated to make Medicare more efficient, rather than simply cutting benefits to recipients. Since low-income citizens generally live shorter lives than wealthier citizens, raising the eligibility age for Medicare to 67 from 65 would disproportionately harm the poor. Reining in the health care system's costs, however, involves taking on politically powerful corporations on Capitol Hill, including the pharmaceutical industry.

"Moving (Medicare) from 65 to 67 is, again, not reducing costs in Medicare," Van Hollen told Fox. "It's not really reforming the Medicare system … there are a lot better ways of doing it."

- more -

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/fiscal-cliff-democrats-social-security_n_2199833.html


Updated to add:

Fox News Host Demands To Know Why Democrats Won’t Raise Medicare Age
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/27/1245971/fox-news-medicare/

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SS and Medicare and Obamacare are permanently OFF the table. Panasonic Nov 2012 #1
+1,000 to what you said. and the ACA also increases Medicaid. It's the one for the poorest Americans freshwest Nov 2012 #6
They are going to do SOMETHING regarding Medicare. What it SHOULD be is.... Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #12
I don't know if it is the same interview or not Liberalynn Nov 2012 #23
Interesting. I agree about cutting benefits. But how do you PLAN for cutting waste/fraud.... Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #28
That's a good point about who dertermines what is wasteful Liberalynn Nov 2012 #29
k&r... spanone Nov 2012 #2
That is my congressman until January MiniMe Nov 2012 #3
Sorry to hear that. Who gets the district? freshwest Nov 2012 #7
Van Hollen will still have a seat, just a different geographic. John Delaney won in my district. MiniMe Nov 2012 #20
Ah, so all is well. That's good. freshwest Nov 2012 #25
Oh, I hate to hear that. I like him. Any chance he'll run again? nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #13
He didn't lose his seat MiniMe Nov 2012 #21
very good news Enrique Nov 2012 #4
Very. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #5
To make sure they stay off the table, keep on with those calls and letters eridani Nov 2012 #8
I am still calling tomorrow nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
Thanks, Pro Sense. As far answering Fox Noise, they should read this: freshwest Nov 2012 #10
Social Security should be on the table. bluestate10 Nov 2012 #11
That has already been discussed by Obama, Reid or Pelosi. Saw it somewhere here, tired of googling. freshwest Nov 2012 #16
that's odd stupidicus Nov 2012 #14
On the table...off the table...Can't he make up his damn mind... kentuck Nov 2012 #15
If Senate Dems really do unite and take this off the table...we're gonna need to Zorra Nov 2012 #17
They have no reason not to. ProSense Nov 2012 #22
me too Liberalynn Nov 2012 #24
Sanders Applauds White House for Taking Social Security Off the Table in Deficit Talks freshwest Nov 2012 #18
Thanks for the link. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #19
Obama and the Democrats must burnsei sensei Nov 2012 #26
Yes. n/t ProSense Nov 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Van Hollen takes Medicare...