Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Van Hollen takes Medicare age increase and Social Security off the table (updated) [View all]
Last edited Tue Nov 27, 2012, 09:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Zach Carter
Fiscal Cliff: House Democrats Close Ranks Against Social Security Cuts
Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Tuesday that Social Security cuts should not be part of any deal to avert the "fiscal cliff."
Van Hollen's comments, which came during an interview with MSNBC's Tamron Hall, reveal that Democratic leaders in the House are closing ranks behind Senate leadership against cuts to the retirement program.
"With respect to Social Security, I agree with what the president has said and what (Rep.) Peter DeFazio said. Social Security is not part of the deficit and debt problem. We're not going to raid Social Security in order to balance other parts of the budget," Van Hollen said.
<....>
Earlier on Tuesday, Van Hollen told Fox News that raising the eligibility age for Medicare was not an effective way to lower the system's long-term costs. Escalating domestic health care costs, which are much higher than those of other developed nations, are a key driver of the long-term U.S. budget deficit. Many progressive lawmakers and economists have advocated to make Medicare more efficient, rather than simply cutting benefits to recipients. Since low-income citizens generally live shorter lives than wealthier citizens, raising the eligibility age for Medicare to 67 from 65 would disproportionately harm the poor. Reining in the health care system's costs, however, involves taking on politically powerful corporations on Capitol Hill, including the pharmaceutical industry.
"Moving (Medicare) from 65 to 67 is, again, not reducing costs in Medicare," Van Hollen told Fox. "It's not really reforming the Medicare system there are a lot better ways of doing it."
- more -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/fiscal-cliff-democrats-social-security_n_2199833.html
Fiscal Cliff: House Democrats Close Ranks Against Social Security Cuts
Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Tuesday that Social Security cuts should not be part of any deal to avert the "fiscal cliff."
Van Hollen's comments, which came during an interview with MSNBC's Tamron Hall, reveal that Democratic leaders in the House are closing ranks behind Senate leadership against cuts to the retirement program.
"With respect to Social Security, I agree with what the president has said and what (Rep.) Peter DeFazio said. Social Security is not part of the deficit and debt problem. We're not going to raid Social Security in order to balance other parts of the budget," Van Hollen said.
<....>
Earlier on Tuesday, Van Hollen told Fox News that raising the eligibility age for Medicare was not an effective way to lower the system's long-term costs. Escalating domestic health care costs, which are much higher than those of other developed nations, are a key driver of the long-term U.S. budget deficit. Many progressive lawmakers and economists have advocated to make Medicare more efficient, rather than simply cutting benefits to recipients. Since low-income citizens generally live shorter lives than wealthier citizens, raising the eligibility age for Medicare to 67 from 65 would disproportionately harm the poor. Reining in the health care system's costs, however, involves taking on politically powerful corporations on Capitol Hill, including the pharmaceutical industry.
"Moving (Medicare) from 65 to 67 is, again, not reducing costs in Medicare," Van Hollen told Fox. "It's not really reforming the Medicare system there are a lot better ways of doing it."
- more -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/fiscal-cliff-democrats-social-security_n_2199833.html
Updated to add:
Fox News Host Demands To Know Why Democrats Wont Raise Medicare Age
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/27/1245971/fox-news-medicare/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
29 replies, 5454 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (42)
ReplyReply to this post
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Van Hollen takes Medicare age increase and Social Security off the table (updated) [View all]
ProSense
Nov 2012
OP
+1,000 to what you said. and the ACA also increases Medicaid. It's the one for the poorest Americans
freshwest
Nov 2012
#6
They are going to do SOMETHING regarding Medicare. What it SHOULD be is....
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#12
Interesting. I agree about cutting benefits. But how do you PLAN for cutting waste/fraud....
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#28
Van Hollen will still have a seat, just a different geographic. John Delaney won in my district.
MiniMe
Nov 2012
#20
That has already been discussed by Obama, Reid or Pelosi. Saw it somewhere here, tired of googling.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#16
Sanders Applauds White House for Taking Social Security Off the Table in Deficit Talks
freshwest
Nov 2012
#18