How do you stop the SCOTUS from the crime of conspiring to subvert the constitution?

[Silent3]

20. There was no good reason for the Supreme Court to take this case in the first place

(Replying to myself now because a message I was replying to was deleted, a message that tried to characterize the SCOTUS's handling of Trump's immunity claims as "normal".)

And they sure moved damned fast when it was about keep Trump on the ballot. Apparently keeping Trump on the ballot is an emergency. A speedy trial for Trump (which is normally considered a benefit, not a bane, for a defendant), and for the American people to have a decision before voting, is apparently not an emergency. Gosh, I wonder why?

Even if the SCOTUS, instead of properly dealing quickly with only the particular case issues before them, wants to go the extra mile and create elaborate tests for private conduct versus official duties of the President, it could still quickly rules on the particulars before them and let Trump's various federal trials continue.

Are you honestly so willing to grant a generous unearned benefit of the doubt to the clearly politically-motivated conservative majority? This is open, naked power politics, not some intellectual stratosphere of lofty, objective judicial decision making.