Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

moniss

(4,274 posts)

4. Thank you for this reference and

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #3)

Sat Apr 27, 2024, 01:29 PM

Apr 27

in regard to the Common Law aspect it would seem to me that the Rwanda Agreement between the countries relies upon the word of Rwanda that people will not be re-trafficked, aka subjected to crime/or returned to their country of origin, and it would be a sure bet that the Tories will say "No need for application of Common Law because there is no risk since we have the word of Rwanda."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UK's Rwanda bill is doomed for political failure [View all] Celerity Apr 27 OP

As I recall the Tories moniss Apr 27 #1

Technically, those grounds for asylum were removed in an act last year, and the Tories rejected an amendment muriel_volestrangler Apr 27 #3

Thank you for this reference and moniss Apr 27 #4

That law should frighten everyone malaise Apr 27 #2