Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why, on Democratic Underground, [View all]perfessor
(268 posts)12. Nobody is suggesting that.
People are asking - quite appropriately imo- if a president ordering such would fall within the bounds of the trump teams argument.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not allowed. Please report if and when you see any post suggesting physical harm to anyone.
Fla Dem
Apr 25
#8
It would probably be helpful for the Justices to understand that they would make themselves....
kentuck
Apr 25
#26
I'd love to see the someone present this discussion to them in exactly those terms.
LT Barclay
Apr 25
#31
I think one hypothetical post about the scenario is enough, but that's just my opinion.
LeftInTX
Apr 25
#15
My question about the President assassinating a Supreme Court Justice was to show how silly Trump's argument is.
surfered
Apr 25
#19
Or...can a hypothetical thought exercise be used like Trump using a quote to get around violating the gag order?
elocs
Apr 26
#41
I have not seen such things, but if so will surely alert. That is not OK. Just because
PatrickforB
Apr 25
#34