Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court's Sinister Six appears to shoot themselves in their collective feet and guarantee a Democratic landslide [View all]0rganism
(24,060 posts)7. "How can you impose restrictions on what Idaho can criminalize?"
Really, Mr. Alito? Is this where we are now?
What if Idaho made your robed ass illegal?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court's Sinister Six appears to shoot themselves in their collective feet and guarantee a Democratic landslide [View all]
Aviation Pro
Apr 24
OP
Well, if hospitals won't observe basic federal laws to provide needed care,
Attilatheblond
Apr 24
#3
If they aren't willing to take the gloves off, then who will be responsible for the loss of our Democracy?
usaf-vet
Apr 24
#45
Absolutely ALEC has been more visable with their actions. But the Federalist Society is the ones teeing up SCOTUS seats.
usaf-vet
Apr 24
#46
Apparently he has never heard of the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors take either.
pazzyanne
Apr 25
#65
Republicans used to be against judicial activism. They seem to love it when it benefits their own desires.
keithbvadu2
Apr 24
#13
Just wait. They'll tank the abortion pill, too. The only way women in this country will be guaranteed
Vinca
Apr 24
#14
I haven't heard what Kavanaugh said, but I agree that Barrett sounded quite skeptical.
ShazzieB
Apr 24
#36
The Subversive Court does not care about law, logic, or consequences, only their extreme ideology.
Hermit-The-Prog
Apr 24
#20
It's absurd. The purpose of federal law cannot be increased risk of death.
bucolic_frolic
Apr 24
#21
"How can you impose restrictions on what Idaho can criminalize?" Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked the solicitor general
3825-87867
Apr 24
#22
Stand your ground doesnt remove the reasonable person standard for self defense.
DetroitLegalBeagle
Apr 24
#39
13 Justices and 10 years MAX. Seeing most justices get on board about late mid 50s/late 60s so that'll let them be
Traurigkeit
Apr 24
#33