Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Merchan Must Lay Down The Law Tomorrow [View all]unblock
(52,691 posts)2. I think the judge already warned him the trial could proceed without him if need be
He has legal representation there so his rights would not be violated.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the judge already warned him the trial could proceed without him if need be
unblock
Apr 22
#2
I'm pretty certain Judge Merchan doesn't care what Andy Weissman or posters on social media think he "must" do.
onenote
Apr 22
#9
That isn't an option. The statute specifies a maximum fine of $1000 per violation. And the DA didn't seek to have Trump
onenote
Apr 22
#16
At this point everybody knows we have a two-tiered judicial system. It's time they just put it in writing
yourout
Apr 22
#26
I'm no legal expert here, but the judge probably doesn't want to prejudice the case.
summer_in_TX
Apr 22
#27
How would a state court judge have authority to direct federal law enforcement to arrest someone for violating a state
onenote
Apr 23
#35
Stick him in a cold cinderblock and glass holding cell with a closed circuit feed
LuvLoogie
Apr 23
#30