General Discussion

Joinfortmill

(14,429 posts)

2. I encourage everyone to read this. You will possibly need to sign in with a Google or FB or other account. Easy peasy

Reply to gab13by13 (Original post)

Fri Mar 29, 2024, 10:31 AM

Mar 29

This will not likely change any minds about Mr. Garland. It hasn't changed mine. But, it will enlighten you about how the case was handled. Garland was careful, methodical, and gave the investigators the freedom to pursue the case where it led them. Time was their enemy, but he game isn't over yet. My bets are on the DOJ and Jack Smith successfully taking Trump down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fantastic article detailing Garland's strategy [View all] gab13by13 Mar 29 OP

Was the Hur report also about Garland "not wanting to make mistakes." ?? Irish_Dem Mar 29 #1

What is really sad gab13by13 Mar 29 #6

i dont think u need them in jail by nov, u just need a perpwalk. mopinko Mar 29 #11

Yep. Irish_Dem Mar 29 #12

I encourage everyone to read this. You will possibly need to sign in with a Google or FB or other account. Easy peasy Joinfortmill Mar 29 #2

I got a different take from the article, gab13by13 Mar 29 #4

They're waiting for permission from the Federalist Society. rubbersole Mar 29 #9

Sorry about the paywall gab13by13 Mar 29 #3

Here's a free link. Lonestarblue Mar 29 #5

Thanks so much. gab13by13 Mar 29 #7

Plain old assbackwards. This wasn't a MOMFUDSKI Mar 29 #8

He should have had a good old-fashioned round-up. dchill Mar 29 #29

Yeah, pretending the rabble could even possibly roll up TheKentuckian Mar 29 #30

You left out an important date Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #10

Time is running out edhopper Mar 29 #13

look up Joshua Schulte Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #18

Jonathan Pollard was first suspected in 1984 edhopper Mar 29 #25

Can you find any that had claims of Executive Privilege? Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #26

Everyone edhopper Mar 29 #27

Good example! Let's look at John Mitchell... Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #28

It's the same article AZSkiffyGeek Mar 29 #14

WTF did I leave out? gab13by13 Mar 29 #15

Jack Smith is Garland's excuse. dchill Mar 29 #32

Insulting those who disagree with you is sooooo classy! dchill Mar 29 #33

It's interesting how the straw man of "nothing was done" always replaces "not enough was done"... Silent3 Mar 30 #40

The likelihood of the former increases as the... dchill Mar 29 #31

You appear to be under the mistaken impression Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #35

It's NOT a case of Deus ex Machina. dchill Mar 30 #36

How would a conviction protect democracy? Fiendish Thingy Mar 30 #37

Conviction is the prescribed solution... dchill Mar 30 #39

And yet, despite conviction, he could still be president. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 30 #41

Well then, everybody can just breathe easy! dchill Mar 30 #42

Seems to me the priority should be defeating him in November Fiendish Thingy Mar 30 #44

Is it possible that the law and the Constitution... dchill Mar 30 #45

link past the paywall UpInArms Mar 29 #16

Oh, Damn, more inconvenience for the Garland cheer leaders. republianmushroom Mar 29 #17

Except the NYT article establishes that no feet were dragged. Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #19

Foot dragging republianmushroom Mar 29 #20

You know what they say about opinions...everybody's got one. Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #21

Yup, and like I said cheer leaders. republianmushroom Mar 29 #22

Feel free to share your opinions Fiendish Thingy Mar 29 #23

As you know, I do, and the option of Garland dragging his feet is believed by many to be factual. republianmushroom Mar 29 #24

Results matter. Earth-shine Mar 29 #34

So taking more than three years and risking delays that take this past the 2024 election was his careful strategy? lees1975 Mar 30 #38

Maybe someone should mention that JUDGES and COURTS are having lots to do about the DELAYS???? bluestarone Mar 30 #43