Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chubb seems to think loaning TSF $91M is a "sound investment" [View all]maxrandb
(15,368 posts)9. What's to stop them from just forgiving the loan?
As I have said before; "$91M is peanuts for the most powerful office on the planet".
Besides, we know that if Donnie Dipshit followed the laws, norms and respected business practices, this transaction would be the first time in his entire life that he has done so.
I am all out of "benefit of the doubt" for this fucking asspickle.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The poster I replied to had never heard of them, and suggested they were a small regional outfit
MichMan
Mar 9
#24
Depends on the interest rate and collateral. Insurance companies are very (very) good at pricing "risk"
CincyDem
Mar 9
#5
Assuming trump loses his appeal, it will be fun watching either the government or Chubb going after trump's assets.
Silent Type
Mar 9
#15
They'll lose their money just as Mike Lindell has lost his money in service to the wannabe dictator.
Vinca
Mar 9
#17
Not voting, but it is virtually certain that Chubb will not lose money on this surety.
onenote
Mar 9
#25
These threads are driving me nuts - some people still seem to think an appeal bond is a bad thing -
Ocelot II
Mar 9
#37