Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Farmer-Rick

(10,279 posts)

25. Oh, so you're saying

Reply to Zeitghost (Reply #22)

Thu Mar 7, 2024, 04:20 PM

Mar 7

Since the Nazi did the actual insurrection act in DC and Not Colorado, the Colorado Supreme Court still couldn't keep him off the ballot.

So considering everything, the Federal Supremes have effectively totally neutralized the 14 Amendment clause 3 for the stinking Nazi's insurrection.

I guess we'll have to be satisfied with the 4 count indictment on felony charges for working to overturn the results of the 2020 election in the run-up to the violent riot in DC.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Supreme Court just turned us all into vigilante voters [View all] Nevilledog Mar 7 OP

It just amazes me that one fucking dirtbag party wants a man like that in charge of the country. Autumn Mar 7 #1

They think it's worth the shortcut to power. eShirl Mar 7 #2

Don't think 'charge of the country' Mr.Bee Mar 7 #24

"it's best to 'let voters decide.'" PSPS Mar 7 #3

Not at all FBaggins Mar 7 #4

But governors can also declare a state of insurrection. limbicnuminousity Mar 7 #7

Not sure why you think that matters FBaggins Mar 7 #9

Appreciate the response. limbicnuminousity Mar 7 #13

He was in no sense "convicted" by the CO courts. That's the point FBaggins Mar 7 #16

SMHL. limbicnuminousity Mar 7 #19

There is plenty of evidence to charge the stinking Nazi Farmer-Rick Mar 7 #14

Probably... but also probably not convict him FBaggins Mar 7 #17

If CO had an insurrection clause Zeitghost Mar 7 #22

Oh, so you're saying Farmer-Rick Mar 7 #25

I would love to see Colorado change their voting laws KS Toronado Mar 7 #5

That would fail even faster FBaggins Mar 7 #10

thanks. appreciating the solid info stopdiggin Mar 7 #18

That whole "states' rights" sentiment is quite malleable, apparently. BobTheSubgenius Mar 7 #6

If the shoe fits.... rubbersole Mar 7 #8

Or, as we used to say when I was young - if the foo shits. BobTheSubgenius Mar 8 #28

I've been thinking about that... CaptainTruth Mar 7 #12

Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. Farmer-Rick Mar 7 #15

Good point. SCOTUS has ruled in favor of state constitutions in cases where... CaptainTruth Mar 8 #27

Not show some respect. No. Don't make a scene. Really low class dung. bucolic_frolic Mar 7 #11

The U.S. Supreme Court is saying, leave it to the voters while they attack voting rights and legalize voter suppression. ShazamIam Mar 7 #20

They didn't really say that at all Zeitghost Mar 7 #23

Yeah, Farmer-Rick Mar 7 #26

Excellent and short article. Worth the click. keopeli Mar 7 #21