Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This should be hammered non-stop: They want to give Constitutional rights to a fertilized egg... [View all]calimary
(81,507 posts)2. Boy, do they EVER!!!
Um
does that mean a pregnant woman gets to vote twice? Once for herself and once for the Unborn momentarily living inside her body?
At this point, I think we need to start asking questions like this.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This should be hammered non-stop: They want to give Constitutional rights to a fertilized egg... [View all]
bluesbassman
Feb 26
OP
It's a strategy that works. Plus, there's plenty of women who support and will vote for "grab 'em by the P" president.
Marcus IM
Feb 26
#34
Like J. Edgar Hoover before him, Lindsey really has it in for others like himself
peppertree
Feb 26
#39
That kind of "logic" is precisely why religion and governance should never mix.
bluesbassman
Feb 26
#22