General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anonymous and the Supposed Hack. [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)And I also sympathize with those that are terrified that a third party might interfere with the electronic voting process. That's why some of us deny to an extreme that a third party influenced the 2000 and 2004 elections. We can accept losing but cant accept having our election stolen. Denial is so warm and comforting.
How scary to think that maybe a third party (Rove) tried to again do what it appears they did in 2000 and 2004. And then to further suggest that a fourth party (Anon) might have save us where "the system" didnt is terrifying. It really shakes up our view of reality.
I think we would all feel much better to think that Rove spent the last 4 years and billions of dollars make yard signs and not "conspiring" to steal another election.
If we could only get our hands on those pesky Anon. We would show them a thing or two like we did Manning and Assange.
Again, I agree with your statement that we need to get our stuff together so we wont have to have pesky Anon to save our asses from Rmoney.