Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What no one is telling you about Washington's marijuana legalization [View all]liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)35. these were the reasons I voted no on it
but it passed and now we will have to try to see if the legislatures can fiddle with it and make it better. They will have to change the 5 nanogram blood limit or they will just fill up the jails again. I also worry for all the 16-20 yr olds out there that will end up being charged. I think they will come down hard on 16-20 yr olds to try and prove to the federal government that the state can be trusted to regulate marijuana. We will see with time how it all unfolds.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smoking "in public" is not illegal but "public places". There is a difference.
uppityperson
Nov 2012
#1
I believe there are 2 cities in California which have blurred the distinction...
Eleanors38
Nov 2012
#11
How do you spell "prohibition?" "T-a-x." Already big biz for cigarette smugglers.
Eleanors38
Nov 2012
#12
Add jury nullification. As more people oppose prohibition more should simply refuse
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#24
I would hope at those prices that the state controlled product would be free of seeds
CBGLuthier
Nov 2012
#6
The zero tolerance and impairment limits won't pass court challenge, IMHO.
kestrel91316
Nov 2012
#32