Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Samuel L. Jackson goes in on Clarence Thomas with a Supreme Court decision reminder that hits close [View all]malthaussen
(17,241 posts)49. Mais naturellement.
I do hope people understand that these folks have been waiting and planning for years to unleash the dogs of war. They want to erase decades of history while they're still alive to gloat about it.
-- Mal
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Samuel L. Jackson goes in on Clarence Thomas with a Supreme Court decision reminder that hits close [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jun 2022
OP
No worries. The state racial classification board will make him a honorary Aryan
dalton99a
Jun 2022
#1
Thank You....Kicked for all to read the explanation. Please read it, It's important!
Stuart G
Jun 2022
#2
I'll be impressed when celebrities refuse to work in states that don't protect reproductive rights.
Fiendish Thingy
Jun 2022
#22
Right after "you" decide to not work in a state that doesn't protect reproductive rights.
Ferrets are Cool
Jun 2022
#37
thomas probably lives in a blue state so I'm sure he will say fuck anyone else's rights
mucifer
Jun 2022
#25
It would be interesting to hear a state's rationale for passing a new miscegenation law.
sop
Jun 2022
#38
I don't think that some states would have to pass new laws (thinking deep South red states).
Scottie Mom
Jun 2022
#50