Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Atlantic: A WARNING FROM EUROPE: THE WORST IS YET TO COME [View all]
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/poland-polarization/568324/. . .
Given the right conditions, any society can turn against democracy. Indeed, if history is anything to go by, all societies eventually will.
. . .
The decision to put a conspiracy theory at the heart of government policy was the source of the authoritarian actions that followed.
. . .
Polarization is normal. Skepticism about liberal democracy is normal. And the appeal of authoritarianism is eternal.
. . .
In truth, the argument about who gets to rule is never over, particularly in an era when people have rejected aristocracy, and no longer believe that leadership is inherited at birth or that the ruling class is endorsed by God. Some of us, in Europe and North America, have settled on the idea that various forms of democratic and economic competition are the fairest alternative to inherited or ordained power.
But we should not have been surprisedI should not have been surprisedwhen the principles of meritocracy and competition were challenged. Democracy and free markets can produce unsatisfying outcomes, after all, especially when badly regulated, or when nobody trusts the regulators, or when people are entering the contest from very different starting points. Sooner or later, the losers of the competition were always going to challenge the value of the competition itself.
More to the point, the principles of competition, even when they encourage talent and create upward mobility, dont necessarily answer deeper questions about national identity, or satisfy the human desire to belong to a moral community. The authoritarian state, or even the semi-authoritarian statethe one-party state, the illiberal stateoffers that promise: that the nation will be ruled by the best people, the deserving people, the members of the party, the believers in the Medium-Size Lie. It may be that democracy has to be bent or business corrupted or court systems wrecked in order to achieve that state. But if you believe that you are one of those deserving people, you will do it. . . .
Given the right conditions, any society can turn against democracy. Indeed, if history is anything to go by, all societies eventually will.
. . .
The decision to put a conspiracy theory at the heart of government policy was the source of the authoritarian actions that followed.
. . .
Polarization is normal. Skepticism about liberal democracy is normal. And the appeal of authoritarianism is eternal.
. . .
In truth, the argument about who gets to rule is never over, particularly in an era when people have rejected aristocracy, and no longer believe that leadership is inherited at birth or that the ruling class is endorsed by God. Some of us, in Europe and North America, have settled on the idea that various forms of democratic and economic competition are the fairest alternative to inherited or ordained power.
But we should not have been surprisedI should not have been surprisedwhen the principles of meritocracy and competition were challenged. Democracy and free markets can produce unsatisfying outcomes, after all, especially when badly regulated, or when nobody trusts the regulators, or when people are entering the contest from very different starting points. Sooner or later, the losers of the competition were always going to challenge the value of the competition itself.
More to the point, the principles of competition, even when they encourage talent and create upward mobility, dont necessarily answer deeper questions about national identity, or satisfy the human desire to belong to a moral community. The authoritarian state, or even the semi-authoritarian statethe one-party state, the illiberal stateoffers that promise: that the nation will be ruled by the best people, the deserving people, the members of the party, the believers in the Medium-Size Lie. It may be that democracy has to be bent or business corrupted or court systems wrecked in order to achieve that state. But if you believe that you are one of those deserving people, you will do it. . . .
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
36 replies, 8971 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (97)
ReplyReply to this post
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The right started focusing on filling Boards of Education across the country back in the 80s.
CrispyQ
Jun 2021
#9
This is why it's so important that Trump and his cultists are prosecuted
KentuckyStiffRipple
Jun 2021
#8
Meritocracy embraced greed, opportunity became privilege, equality became hierarchy.
bucolic_frolic
Jun 2021
#17
Correction:"satisfy the human desire to belong to a community." Add: human tendency to think one is
andym
Jun 2021
#24
+1, People don't understand the US is enthralled in an insurrection against democracy RIGHT NOW!
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#30