Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alex hamilton on the 2a and the militia [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)4. Most gunners only read "shall not be infringed." They are too stupid, or attracted to guns, to admit
that the Constitution does not say they HAVE TO own guns and carry them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"the right of _the people_" not the right of the members of the militia. n/t
PoliticAverse
Sep 2019
#37
You mean the right that the same framers ensconced in their respective state constitutions?
X_Digger
Sep 2019
#10
What is so difficult to understand about the phrase "well regulated militia" in a Federal
guillaumeb
Sep 2019
#30
Pizza being important for study sessions, the right to grow and harvest tomatoes is protected.
X_Digger
Sep 2019
#43
Some US citizens have never accepted that the slave faction lost that civil war. eom
guillaumeb
Sep 2019
#9
Most gunners only read "shall not be infringed." They are too stupid, or attracted to guns, to admit
Hoyt
Sep 2019
#4
Which confirms that "well-regulated" is synonymous with "well-trained" in today's syntax
NickB79
Sep 2019
#11
And that argument, precisely, is why we have a national guard, administered by the several States...
Volaris
Sep 2019
#22
All well and good, but the militia was based on the people keeping and bearing arms.
aikoaiko
Sep 2019
#12
No it is not it's a gift from the supreme court . The militia was based on putting down insurrection
Fullduplexxx
Sep 2019
#19