General Discussion

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)

25. Is there a law saying that the GJ docs must be given to the House, for impeachment? nt

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #7)

Fri May 31, 2019, 05:19 PM

May 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For those supporting impeachment, what will be the outcome? What do you want to happen? [View all] wasupaloopa May 2019 OP

By impeaching Trump we will not be complicit like republicans in giving away our Democracy standingtall May 2019 #1

Thank you for that wasupaloopa May 2019 #2

Who says that won't ever happen? ehrnst May 2019 #11

I don't know for sure it won't happen but if an inquiry isn't opened soon standingtall May 2019 #12

We have 18 months. ehrnst May 2019 #13

We don't even have the full 18 months unless we are going to pull a Comey standingtall May 2019 #16

Again - you think you have better judgement than Pelosi as to if we are ready to start? ehrnst May 2019 #17

Why don't you ask Elizabeth Warren the these same questions standingtall May 2019 #19

Comey didn't hurt Clinton's chances of winning. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #24

I still think what Comey did hurt her and so did Jill Stein standingtall May 2019 #29

Belief and facts are two different things. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #38

Russia,Stein,Comey and the usual republican cheating standingtall May 2019 #41

I understand you believe Comey interfered. But there are no facts indicating that. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #45

But there really are no concrete facts in regards to Comey standingtall May 2019 #47

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/ spooky3 May 2019 #58

The polls that were wrong? They don't prove anything of the sort. TwilightZone May 2019 #64

Based on what? Trumpocalypse May 2019 #14

Here you go standingtall May 2019 #18

Doesn't support your argument Trumpocalypse May 2019 #20

I want to see him going to jail in handcuffs. RainCaster May 2019 #3

I posted this about a week ago. Control-Z May 2019 #4

Most people don't watch hearings. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #26

K & R Control-Z! Nevermypresident May 2019 #28

The problem will be that we will alll see two different proceedings marylandblue May 2019 #39

I'm afraid that's wishful thinking. Captain Stern May 2019 #52

I can still remember my Dad being absolutely glued to the TV Crunchy Frog May 2019 #56

We all were.. mountain grammy May 2019 #60

That's not how media works anymore. Codeine Jun 2019 #70

By impeach the stuff from the mueller report becomes common knowledge. rusty quoin May 2019 #5

Impeach and convict then escort him out of the white house. shraby May 2019 #6

He can't be "convicted," if he can't be indicted. Impeachment by the House won't remove him.nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #23

1. The Grand Jury documents that are being withheld would be handed over to the House -- pnwmom May 2019 #7

Is there a law saying that the GJ docs must be given to the House, for impeachment? nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #25

More info here: pnwmom May 2019 #27

So there's no law, but it's possible. nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #32

There would be no need to go through the DOJ. It would be directly between the GJ and the House, pnwmom May 2019 #33

It's no guarantee. It's only possible. It would be appealed and left to a Court to decide. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #34

Here's from another source. (And laws can be disputed too. It's also a law that the IRS pnwmom May 2019 #36

People in DU were misreading the tax return-IRS law. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #40

The point is that it is up to the JUDGE to decide, not Barr or the DOJ. pnwmom May 2019 #44

Any order to disclose that material is appealable jberryhill May 2019 #55

I understand. But the question I was addressing was whether there was a "law" pnwmom May 2019 #57

And what I'm saying is... jberryhill May 2019 #59

#2. That's not what that means madville May 2019 #37

Not according to James Madison, one of the Founding Fathers. pnwmom May 2019 #42

That's just an opinion from their debates during ratification madville May 2019 #48

The Constitution says pnwmom May 2019 #51

Exactly madville Jun 2019 #66

It doesn't sound like a stretch to me at all, especially when anyone can read pnwmom Jun 2019 #67

The modern SCOTUS would have to make a ruling madville Jun 2019 #68

And that SCOTUS is top-heavy with "originalists." nt pnwmom Jun 2019 #71

MINIMUM 1. Public should know about Red Don's crimes, 2. Hurt republicans politically. Both can be uponit7771 May 2019 #8

Public Hearings! shanny May 2019 #9

Don't need impeachment for public hearings Trumpocalypse May 2019 #15

Yep. That's actually my point. shanny May 2019 #46

Impeachment isn't necessary for that. nt Honeycombe8 May 2019 #22

Duh. shanny May 2019 #54

She's a better strategist than you think. marylandblue May 2019 #43

She's smart enough to know shanny May 2019 #53

I've heard "we can walk and chew gum at the same time" marylandblue Jun 2019 #65

"We talk about trump all the time." Indeed we do--on his terms. shanny Jun 2019 #69

Democrats are not losing their enthusiasm. marylandblue Jun 2019 #72

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2019 #10

It records his crimes, for historical purposes, and will remain on his Presidential record. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #21

I want him Faux pas May 2019 #30

Many people are visual learners. guillaumeb May 2019 #31

I want impeachment hearings C_U_L8R May 2019 #35

At minimum....an official and more complete historical record The empressof all May 2019 #49

I don't have any illusions that he will be removed madville May 2019 #50

I believe the more political damage done to Trump during the House investigations, sop May 2019 #61

Impeachment will show that Trump's conduct is unacceptable. Qutzupalotl May 2019 #62

Trump will resign riverwalker May 2019 #63