Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Impeachment Lessons: What saved Clinton from Nixon's fate [View all]
Pew Research wrote in 2009 (emphasis added):
The Public Saves President Clintons Job
Of all the opinions that polls have tracked in the modern era, none has been more remarkable than President Bill Clintons approval ratings rising on the news of allegations that he had carried on an affair with a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. A Pew Research Center poll in mid-January 1998 found that 61% of its respondents approved of the way the president was handling his job.11 Two weeks later, Clintons ratings spiked to 71%, reflecting public outrage over the way the media had prejudged Clintons guilt.12 The same trend was recorded in Gallup and other national surveys. The Pew Research poll analysis found the public more discontented with the presidents accusers in the news media than upset by Clintons alleged misbehavior.13
The publics unexpected rallying to Clintons side led to a transformation of the Washington establishments judgment of his political viability. Before news of Clintons polling boost, political insiders had all but written him off. Public support for the president allowed, if not encouraged, congressional Democrats to rally to his side.
The impact of Clintons standing in the polls along with growing antipathy toward the presidents accusers were also potent factors in the impeachment debate and the broader politics of that contentious midterm year. The public stood by Clinton through each chapter of the saga: his grand jury testimony, his admission of lying, the revelations of the Starr report, and ultimately the Republican vote to impeach him. He ended the year with a 71% approval rating. His party actually picked up eight seats in the House of Representatives an unusual occurrence for a second-term president, let alone one about to be impeached. It is inconceivable to think that public opinion could have had such an impact in an era prior to the emergence of the media polls.
Of all the opinions that polls have tracked in the modern era, none has been more remarkable than President Bill Clintons approval ratings rising on the news of allegations that he had carried on an affair with a White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. A Pew Research Center poll in mid-January 1998 found that 61% of its respondents approved of the way the president was handling his job.11 Two weeks later, Clintons ratings spiked to 71%, reflecting public outrage over the way the media had prejudged Clintons guilt.12 The same trend was recorded in Gallup and other national surveys. The Pew Research poll analysis found the public more discontented with the presidents accusers in the news media than upset by Clintons alleged misbehavior.13
The publics unexpected rallying to Clintons side led to a transformation of the Washington establishments judgment of his political viability. Before news of Clintons polling boost, political insiders had all but written him off. Public support for the president allowed, if not encouraged, congressional Democrats to rally to his side.
The impact of Clintons standing in the polls along with growing antipathy toward the presidents accusers were also potent factors in the impeachment debate and the broader politics of that contentious midterm year. The public stood by Clinton through each chapter of the saga: his grand jury testimony, his admission of lying, the revelations of the Starr report, and ultimately the Republican vote to impeach him. He ended the year with a 71% approval rating. His party actually picked up eight seats in the House of Representatives an unusual occurrence for a second-term president, let alone one about to be impeached. It is inconceivable to think that public opinion could have had such an impact in an era prior to the emergence of the media polls.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 1520 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Without convincing the public of that, he would have been convicted by Senate or resigned. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#2
Democrats didn't gain anything either in the 98 midterms and then lost the presidency in part cause
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#7
Wrong. Democrats gained five seats in the house and one governorship in 1998 midterms
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#8
It was best since 1822. That's a different story than when you wrote they didn't gain "anything".
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#10
In this case it also got the resignation of Newt Gingrich. Not "little".
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#14