Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No more indictments might just be a brilliant move by Mueller [View all]pnwmom
(109,020 posts)35. It would be illegal if, as many believe, Assange and Wikileaks are really a Russian operation.
Stone getting a heads up from them would be the "coordination" or "collusion" with the Russians to interfere with the election.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
SDNY is federal, so those crimes are pardonable, but crimes charged by
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#2
Citations, please? I haven't seen many who think it can be done, and a lot who can't.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#79
The idea is absurd. It's as if Trumpy can declare himself a king, and we're all his subjects. But...
Eyeball_Kid
Mar 2019
#82
Yeah, so? MUELLER can't change it. And nobody ever thought William Barr was an ally.
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#33
It would be illegal if, as many believe, Assange and Wikileaks are really a Russian operation.
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#35
Federal law prohibits ANYONE from soliciting from a foreign source anything of value for a campaign.
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#43
So MAAAYBE Roger Stone could be in trouble. But he's not even indicted for it, is he?
mr_lebowski
Mar 2019
#44
They're not done with Roger Stone. No one has any idea what he's going to admit to
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#45
Okay, information can have 'value' but this is campaign FINANCE law we're dealing with
mr_lebowski
Mar 2019
#52
You're assuming that the FBI wasn't taping the Russians and Wikileaks and their conversations
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#55
The things of value didn't have to come from Russia. Wikileaks and Assange are also foreign sources.
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#57
The Steele Dossier said Russia went to a third party for plausible deniability of their involvement
JonLP24
Mar 2019
#66
Saw on MSNBC that prominent NY prosecutors said sitting POTUS could be indicted.
triron
Mar 2019
#50
The State of New York has plenty of crimes that are just as serious.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#23
We are not finished with tRump yet. And nobody talking has seen the report!
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2019
#7
I hate to say this with all my heart and soul but unless there are some huge revelations in the
Pepsidog
Mar 2019
#24
I hope so. But I'm afraid Americans have a short memory and in 2 years this will be old news.
Pepsidog
Mar 2019
#72
It's already a "something burger." Trump has been exposed to the world. He is not who he has said
allgood33
Mar 2019
#64
The only problem is since the DOJ has a policy of not indicting a president.
lancelyons
Mar 2019
#78
We can hope. But trump isn't going to go down on indictments regarding his foundation and taxes.
Hoyt
Mar 2019
#37
"I have never heard anybody but Trump accuse him of political bias" -- Let's not go *that* far
Azathoth
Mar 2019
#60
I trust Mueller. If he didnt indict someone it wasnt because they were not obviously guilty
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2019
#80
Apparently the lying and stonewalling prevented Mueller from obtaining necessary evidence
wishstar
Mar 2019
#69
Brilliant!!! Let the Traitor-in-Chief off the goddamn hook... Mueller's a fuckin' GENIUS!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2019
#81