Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Scruffy1

(3,255 posts)
10. Except he didn't have to tell Cohen to lie to be guilty.
Mon Jan 21, 2019, 09:24 PM
Jan 2019

If he was in the loop and knew it was lie its a conspiracy. I think Muellar was just not give the public the idea that Trump had to actually be caught gving instructions to be guilty. It would be raising the bar for conviction. The "public" doesn't know squat about legalese. We all the time see that someone is pronouced "innocent" in the press. There is no such thing in law. It's called not guilty. I think Mueller also wanted to show his organization is not leaking. He never said the conclusion was wrong just the evidence used. I'm thinking that they've got Jr. cold and want to run up conspiracy on the dad. We won't really know for sure until the report is issued and even then it will be a fight to get the information from Barr. He is going to delay and obfuscate for as long as possible in order to give time for a resignation deal because GOP does not want an impeachment showcase that might expose matters beyond the Special prosecuters mandate like hacking voting electronic voting. The Russian interference is just the tip of the iceberg. This is why I'm strongly for impeachment. If the house impeaches there has to be trial in the Senate and its an open process that could lead to many other crimes besides the Russian investigation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, well, well... So I ...»Reply #10