Is this 'too bold' of a statement to make about Ron Paul? [View all]
In an online convo at another site (has a politics board but not politically oriented) - I brought up Ron Paul's many statements in regards to black Americans over the years early last week.
Yesterday I posted the following in response to some of his vociferous defenders trying to explain away his writing and verbal manure over the years:
If it walks like a duck
Talks like a duck
Writes like a duck
It's a duck. It's very easy for a white woman to not be afraid. He doesn't intend to make such repressive laws that would force a white woman to be one of those step and fetchers in the help.
Your liberty - the whip at my back. Sorry but it's a duck to me.
And this precisely why some states can't be given the privilege of states rights. They had a hundred years to stand up straight and fly right and they couldn't be decent Americans and do the right thing. The things that Ron Paul hates? They had to be legislated because of people like him.
I can almost hear him saying: I don't dislike The Black Folk I just wouldn't want to have to treat one in my practice.
Someone said that was a pretty bold statement to make . . . she was all 'I've got the vapors' over it.
So - was it bold? I countered with:
So what if it's a bold statement. Ron Paul has made a lot of the years . . .
Turn about is fair play.
What? If he reads that he's going to cry like a little girl?
Why am I not allowed to point out that he's too wet to step on and too low to kick? The fact is - he is.
I'm a black woman. I was the target of the class of 1994. I hear dog whistles when I hear them. This man is one big dog whistle. And - I don't think I'm the only minority - let alone minority woman in America who thinks about Ron Paul just as I've written. When I read his words . . . when I see his video . . . when I see who he 'pals around with' and 'rubs shoulders with' - isn't it my statement obvious?