General Discussion

Solly Mack

(90,765 posts)

8. She's actually spelling out why she would in the paper.

Thu Jul 5, 2018, 03:24 AM

Jul 2018

Her word choices and the framing of her argument about stare decisis and its relationship to Roe, as one of her examples - she mentions Roe 9 different times as an example throughout the paper as a ruling that couldn't be considered written in stone (established precedent) since it was controversial to some people...so it could be changed/overturned.

That she would even take the opinion that it could be overturned as not being a solid precedent tells us all we need to know about her.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Precedent and Jurisprudential Disagreement (stare decisis) by Amy Coney Barrett [View all] Solly Mack Jul 2018 OP

a revolutionary, sub rosa. elleng Jul 2018 #1

I've been digging about the net for her academic works. Solly Mack Jul 2018 #2

This is important. Solly Mack Jul 2018 #3

I also think she would. It's important that DUers read this so I recommended it. Sophia4 Jul 2018 #7

She's actually spelling out why she would in the paper. Solly Mack Jul 2018 #8

K&R... spanone Jul 2018 #4

Thank you Solly Mack Jul 2018 #5

👍🏼 spanone Jul 2018 #6

Thanks for posting this, Solly. brer cat Jul 2018 #9

Collins could claim that isn't a hostile demonstration. Solly Mack Jul 2018 #10

"The Constitution does not expressly protect a right to privacy," Amy C Barrett Solly Mack Jul 2018 #11

Brett Kavanaugh Solly Mack Jul 2018 #12

Raymond Kethledge Solly Mack Jul 2018 #13

... Solly Mack Jul 2018 #14