Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(42,752 posts)
32. or maybe he wasn't certain about retiring 8 months ago when he was hiring clerks
Fri Jun 29, 2018, 11:32 PM
Jun 2018

SCOTUS justices start interviewing (directly or indirectly) prospective clerks about a year in advance and usually have their clerks lined up before the end of the year -- and that appears to be the case with Kennedy, who had made hiring decisions for the October 2018 term back in December 2017.

So maybe he wasn't sure what he was going to do. In that situation, the logical thing to do would be to hire clerks, since the deeper into the year, the more difficult it would get (and other justices might have gobbled up the most attractive candidates).

While I opted not to pursue a court clerkship while in law school, several of my classmates did. Those that accepted positions with older judges did so with the knowledge that the judge that hired them might decide to retire by the time their clerkships were scheduled to start.

Because it is great for their resumes jberryhill Jun 2018 #1
This, he probably wanted to quiet the rumor mill and enjoy his last term in peace Amishman Jun 2018 #4
Bingo DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2018 #6
Because he wasn't pressured to retire prior until last week, when the Blue Wave seems apparent. TheBlackAdder Jun 2018 #2
Standard practice oberliner Jun 2018 #3
No, it isn't. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2018 #7
"also a shitty thing to do to the four clerks he hired" jberryhill Jun 2018 #9
I guess it would depend on what job you were applying for. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2018 #15
The ACLU would snap up a Kennedy law clerk ... EffieBlack Jun 2018 #21
Maybe they would... but would they want to work for the ACLU? The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2018 #22
Possibly. EffieBlack Jun 2018 #23
Yes, it is oberliner Jun 2018 #12
Do you have some examples or citations? sl8 Jun 2018 #36
Citation needed mythology Jun 2018 #24
he wasn't then sure he would retire. unblock Jun 2018 #5
What happens to the 4 clerks? Sanity Claws Jun 2018 #8
They will be fine DetroitLegalBeagle Jun 2018 #13
Maybe he is retiring because of extortion. yellerpup Jun 2018 #10
It does smell fishier than the tuna salad sub I left in my car last night. NightWatcher Jun 2018 #11
Or the uneaten cat food in the garbage can. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2018 #16
Thats funny. yellerpup Jun 2018 #17
Maybe that's one of the little tidbits the GOP defacto7 Jun 2018 #28
That's what I was thinking. yellerpup Jun 2018 #29
Between trump pressuring him duforsure Jun 2018 #14
Perhaps his son is a witness to or participant in a financial crime. yellerpup Jun 2018 #18
Because he wasn't thinking about retiring Cha Jun 2018 #19
that sounds about right.... FM123 Jun 2018 #27
Perfect. yellerpup Jun 2018 #30
I got it from Soph.. passing Cha Jun 2018 #31
or maybe he wasn't certain about retiring 8 months ago when he was hiring clerks onenote Jun 2018 #32
Thanks for the insight. yellerpup Jun 2018 #35
C'mon we know. He was planning to go for another term. Tatiana Jun 2018 #20
So what's the end game? Replace him with Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2018 #33
This is about consolidating power. Tatiana Jun 2018 #34
There may be more benign reasons such as recent health concerns. andym Jun 2018 #25
Bought off. kochs likely. Jakes Progress Jun 2018 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did Justice Kennedy h...»Reply #32