General Discussion

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)

95. I see you joined the cult. I need splainin even out side the thread

Thu Jun 28, 2018, 08:02 PM

Jun 2018

I guess you can get on my ass about this too:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=10804326

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rachel just was talking on MSNBC just now. She said Dems drive a race car that can do 200 MPH but [View all] wasupaloopa Jun 2018 OP

I wish there were Dem pols get the red out Jun 2018 #1

and are told to be civil. shanny Jun 2018 #2

"Bernie Sanders Defends Sarah Sanders: People Have a Right To Go to a Restaurant for Dinner" Cha Jun 2018 #86

We can't do what McConnell did SHRED Jun 2018 #3

Yeah, but when we had the WH, House, and Senate in 2009... ADX Jun 2018 #9

Yes clearly we did nothing mythology Jun 2018 #15

'So far all Republicans have gotten through is a bad tax cut.' Exotica Jun 2018 #21

Yeah, this whole fascist regime stuff.... SergeStorms Jun 2018 #92

I didn't say we didn't get anything accomplished... ADX Jun 2018 #23

As I remember we only had a "majority' for a few weeks or months. pangaia Jun 2018 #30

A "majority" and a "super-majority" are two different things... ADX Jun 2018 #33

Saved the economy? Magoo48 Jun 2018 #76

We did quite a lot in a limited window of time. Codeine Jun 2018 #50

Lost on Rachel Awsi Dooger Jun 2018 #13

bs. rockfordfile Jun 2018 #19

It is not a polarized environment. pangaia Jun 2018 #31

I think we will from now on. kag Jun 2018 #44

Not at that time, I no doubt believe we wouldn't have changed senate rules on this issue to prevent uponit7771 Jun 2018 #54

There is no proof that we would have done that... its easy to say now. lancelyons Jun 2018 #66

Respectively, is that an excuse or a criticism? And what's the difference here? keopeli Jun 2018 #71

I don't buy that. Volaris Jun 2018 #78

the media has a lot to do with this. unblock Jun 2018 #4

The media is not the opposition party. Chickensoup Jun 2018 #17

What are you talking about? rockfordfile Jun 2018 #20

Sorry but I am not going to explain Chickensoup Jun 2018 #25

No they don't. They go for the loud shiny object. As in: CONS who throw hissy fits and calimary Jun 2018 #40

+1000 nt Shipwack Jun 2018 #62

Democrats: Take Off the damn restrictor plates! Full speed ahead! Ilsa Jun 2018 #5

If they make abortion illegal Mr.Bill Jun 2018 #32

Hey guys: no more sex. Even if married. Because roughly Ilsa Jun 2018 #37

Nobody is going to armed conflict over abortion. 7962 Jun 2018 #60

How Sweet ChubbyStar Jun 2018 #82

And just who would you be shooting? 7962 Jun 2018 #84

a zillion times this jodymarie aimee Jun 2018 #6

Abso-fuckin-lutely!! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2018 #73

I wanted Bernie Warren in 2016 jodymarie aimee Jun 2018 #74

I would have taken them in either order in 2016. But, hey, there's always this... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2018 #81

the right does not respect that...they respect you bloodying their noses and taking what you want. Thomas Hurt Jun 2018 #7

Stunningly accurate bookj... pangaia Jun 2018 #34

So much of our dem leadership seems caught in the old adage... CincyDem Jun 2018 #8

Trying to play checkers with a wild ape usually ends up with said ape knocking the board over and Guy Whitey Corngood Jun 2018 #10

We gotta be in it to win it. C_U_L8R Jun 2018 #11

A strongly-worded letter should do the trick superpatriotman Jun 2018 #12

Yeah. We might need our own Nunes or Chaffetz about now Freethinker65 Jun 2018 #14

It's easy to fling accusations mythology Jun 2018 #16

I think the word Rachel was searching for was 'governor'. SamKnause Jun 2018 #18

Reid, Democrats trigger 'nuclear' option; eliminate most filibusters on nominees oberliner Jun 2018 #22

But not for Supreme Court justices. McConnell did that. Nanjeanne Jun 2018 #35

Just saying that we fight hard also oberliner Jun 2018 #36

Yes I know what you said. Nanjeanne Jun 2018 #75

Rachel knows what she's talking about democrank Jun 2018 #24

The right are Nazis Liberalhammer Jun 2018 #26

I have been telling everyone since 16 elmac Jun 2018 #27

Look I like Rachel and all .. but this is why I have pundit fatigue. JHan Jun 2018 #28

Yes. That was how Republicans got in this position. bearsfootball516 Jun 2018 #53

Exactly +++ JHan Jun 2018 #83

She's right! You've seen how they whine when just a few protestors take action? Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 #29

I'm seriously hoping mountain grammy Jun 2018 #38

I have been praying for worse than that. wasupaloopa Jun 2018 #51

Frankly, Obama could have made a recess appointment of Garland. KPN Jun 2018 #39

Didn't they remain in session so he couldn't? Not the entire Senate, but one flunkie per day Vinca Jun 2018 #41

I don't think so. I think, if I remember right, KPN Jun 2018 #42

I'm not sure either and in the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter much at the moment. Vinca Jun 2018 #46

SCOTUS had ruled previously that a 3 day recess wasnt long enough for recess appts. 7962 Jun 2018 #63

Thanks. You are right. I stand corrected. KPN Jun 2018 #88

I didn't get that either. At least make them have to phyically make the effort for the record books LiberalLovinLug Jun 2018 #45

Garland would have been required to permanentlgive up his judicial position on the DC court to take in2herbs Jun 2018 #64

You are right -- that too. I stand corrected. KPN Jun 2018 #89

because 50 mph populistdriven Jun 2018 #87

Old lady here----what on earth are "wypipo"? virgogal Jun 2018 #43

Wait around it will pop up again. It is a cult thing IMHO. It gets 300 replies. The biggest group wasupaloopa Jun 2018 #49

pretty well summed it up right there! 7962 Jun 2018 #65

I can certainly understand why explanations are a waste of your time. LanternWaste Jun 2018 #93

I see you joined the cult. I need splainin even out side the thread wasupaloopa Jun 2018 #95

You haven't missed anything. There always has to be a new "thing" to agitate. 7962 Jun 2018 #67

A term that POC use for racist white people. .99center Jun 2018 #70

wypipo is the new nickname for 'white people.' PatrickforO Jun 2018 #80

Let me get this straight..... chesterslick Jun 2018 #47

I completely agree. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2018 #48

This message was self-deleted by its author radhika Jun 2018 #52

To use another analogy, this time from The Godfather OnlinePoker Jun 2018 #55

Post removed Post removed Jun 2018 #56

We don't walk lockstep. That's also a strength. ehrnst Jun 2018 #57

Trump's authority to replace Kennedy on the USSC may not be as clear a path as Republicans hope. in2herbs Jun 2018 #58

The Constitution doesnt specify the number of Justices. 7962 Jun 2018 #85

Well said! Sophia4 Jun 2018 #59

you are going to get alot of posters in this thread. Democrats have acted very weak. lancelyons Jun 2018 #61

Dems need to hire Steve Schmidt or Rick Wilson DeminPennswoods Jun 2018 #68

It's over! HOPE just died. If you thought Reagan's legacy was bad, you haven't seen anything yet. walkingman Jun 2018 #69

You can't fight a bully playing by the rules. txwhitedove Jun 2018 #72

We Democrats shadowmayor Jun 2018 #77

But when you try to say this up here Thrill Jun 2018 #79

We have threads discouraging idealistic young Dems from running for office IronLionZion Jun 2018 #90

Truer words have never been spoken. SergeStorms Jun 2018 #91

So... stop playing nice with Republican and stop discussing racial matters on DU LanternWaste Jun 2018 #94