Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
32. Wow. Saving.
Sat May 26, 2018, 09:04 AM
May 2018

I very rarely turn on the television and since we haven't got cable, it's usually Public TV. The MSM hasn't changed much since "yellow journalism" days of the late 19th century.

Yellow journalism was a style of newspaper reporting that emphasized sensationalism over facts. During its heyday in the late 19th century it was one of many factors that helped push the United States and Spain into war in Cuba and the Philippines, leading to the acquisition of overseas territory by the United States.

Example of Yellow Journalism in the cover of the Pulitzer’s World
The term originated in the competition over the New York City newspaper market between major newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst. At first, yellow journalism had nothing to do with reporting, but instead derived from a popular cartoon strip about life in New York’s slums called Hogan’s Alley, drawn by Richard F. Outcault. Published in color by Pulitzer’s New York World, the comic’s most well-known character came to be known as the Yellow Kid, and his popularity accounted in no small part for a tremendous increase in sales of the World. In 1896, in an effort to boost sales of his New York Journal, Hearst hired Outcault away from Pulitzer, launching a fierce bidding war between the two publishers over the cartoonist. Hearst ultimately won this battle, but Pulitzer refused to give in and hired a new cartoonist to continue drawing the cartoon for his paper. This battle over the Yellow Kid and a greater market share gave rise to the term yellow journalism.


Once the term had been coined, it extended to the sensationalist style employed by the two publishers in their profit-driven coverage of world events, particularly developments in Cuba. Cuba had long been a Spanish colony and the revolutionary movement, which had been simmering on and off there for much of the 19th century, intensified during the 1890s. Many in the United States called upon Spain to withdraw from the island, and some even gave material support to the Cuban revolutionaries. Hearst and Pulitzer devoted more and more attention to the Cuban struggle for independence, at times accentuating the harshness of Spanish rule or the nobility of the revolutionaries, and occasionally printing rousing stories that proved to be false. This sort of coverage, complete with bold headlines and creative drawings of events, sold a lot of papers for both publishers.

The peak of yellow journalism, in terms of both intensity and influence, came in early 1898, when a U.S. battleship, the Maine, sunk in Havana harbor. The naval vessel had been sent there not long before in a display of U.S. power and, in conjunction with the planned visit of a Spanish ship to New York, an effort to defuse growing tensions between the United States and Spain. On the night of February 15, an explosion tore through the ship’s hull, and the Maine went down. Sober observers and an initial report by the colonial government of Cuba concluded that the explosion had occurred on board, but Hearst and Pulitzer, who had for several years been selling papers by fanning anti-Spanish public opinion in the United States, published rumors of plots to sink the ship. When a U.S. naval investigation later stated that the explosion had come from a mine in the harbor, the proponents of yellow journalism seized upon it and called for war. By early May, the Spanish-American War had begun.


I've known a lot of reporters and editors. They are, for the most part, not geared for this. It's the money guys that are. The newspaper/magazine/tv etc. chains that "have to earn for the stockholders". I think I may become a hermit.
Are you suggesting that all white school shooters should be shot on sight by the police The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #1
That's how the system "SHOULD WORK", but tell that to the people shot for a busted tail light Civic Justice May 2018 #4
Shooting people on sight is not my idea of "civic justice." The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #5
I bet you'd change your mind if they were shooting up YOUR kids in a school.... Civic Justice May 2018 #6
No. If it's possible to arrest someone instead of killing them The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #7
I hope you take this VOCAL position the next time the police pull their guns on unarmed black people Civic Justice May 2018 #10
I have, and I do. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #11
you are purposefully being obtuse.... Civic Justice May 2018 #21
I am not being "obtuse," purposefully or otherwise. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #22
You said: I don't believe in the death penalty, ever, for anyone Civic Justice May 2018 #24
+1000 When when we call for the summary execution of children, we lose our humanity. Demsrule86 May 2018 #28
I believe in the merits of Justice, but a Mass Killer of Others, fits a whole different spectrum Civic Justice May 2018 #33
So who decides what murders rise to the level where summary justice by cop is justified? Demsrule86 May 2018 #39
Nobody said Murder was right, the discussion is about "those who kill kids in school". Civic Justice May 2018 #41
Tell that to the Cities that have let police off the hook for killing UNARMED black people... !!!! Civic Justice May 2018 #42
That has nothing to do with this...nothing. Demsrule86 May 2018 #44
Police should not be jury and executioner regardless of race...two wrongs never Demsrule86 May 2018 #25
What you describe is not justice but vengeance. There is a difference you know. Demsrule86 May 2018 #31
My nephews son goes to that school. He was there today. He is fine. spanone May 2018 #2
I am thankful that your nephew was not injured or worse. Demsrule86 May 2018 #29
Thank you!!! spanone May 2018 #30
Come on now malaise May 2018 #3
The shooter was a 13 year old boy oberliner May 2018 #8
How much difference do you think that made to the people who were shot? Civic Justice May 2018 #9
Why do you think the problem of black people getting shot by police The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #12
Miss the point all you want; you either understand whats written or you don't Civic Justice May 2018 #16
That one is deliberately ignoring your point. Tipperary May 2018 #35
whom ever "that one" is... does not have to submit to anyone's opinion... Civic Justice May 2018 #43
Probably quite a bit oberliner May 2018 #15
I don't believe in execution in any form. I will merely say...you are wrong and should delete this Demsrule86 May 2018 #27
Why... Civic Justice May 2018 #37
Advocating the shooting of a 13 year old by law enforcement is wrong and should not be posted here. Demsrule86 May 2018 #38
Either get Perspective and Context of the conversation of go to another post... Civic Justice May 2018 #40
You are behaving in a very rude fashion...I can reply to any post I choose in a respectful manner... Demsrule86 May 2018 #45
you chose to ignore this so, I'll repeat it for you. Civic Justice May 2018 #46
How old was malaise May 2018 #13
He was 14 oberliner May 2018 #14
why didn't you get that message to the police who shot the kid at the park a year or so ago... Civic Justice May 2018 #17
Tamir Rice was 12 uppityperson May 2018 #23
Don't make me post his open casket malaise May 2018 #18
Which isn't particularly relevant to police shootings given police didn't kill Till. mythology May 2018 #20
The police didn't do anything about it either.... the men who killed him went free... Civic Justice May 2018 #26
An unarmed teacher took the kid down RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #19
Lol. Well done. Tipperary May 2018 #36
Wow. Saving. raven mad May 2018 #32
The Gulf of Tonkin comes to mind... resulting in the death of MILLIONS.... Civic Justice May 2018 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Indiana middle schooler r...»Reply #32