General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Clinton Reckoning Is One of the Most Essential #MeToo Revelations Yet [View all]delisen
(6,044 posts)shielding of of male NY times reporter Glenn Thrush.
This above story is based on recent article by Maggie Haberman in the NY Times
The propagation of propaganda against H Clinton-This a a great example of a propaganda network in action.
Maggie Haberman is continuing to work with known sexual abuser at New York Times, Glenn Thrush, at New York Times. Ny Times editor docked pay of Thrush but shielded him by refusing to fire him.
Haberman has not protested the New York Times shielding of Thrush. Instead she is collaborating with him on a book!
Shocking. But the way the Haberman story-which is short on facts- has been picked up by other publications does show us how propaganda can move swiftly and gain wide readership in the current communications world.
Notice the weasel word "appears" in Carterucci's article above. I am astonished that Slate published this.
The writer tells us that "It would hardly be news if a Republican presidential candidate allowed a harasser to keep his job; it would be astonishing news if there wasnt rampant harassment in, say, the ranks of the Donald Trump campaign."
Are we to conclude that we must the ignore the Republican harassment today as "not news' and instead go back ten years to . Clinton's campaign and try to make news?
Today's news is Glenn Thrush......why don' Haberman and Carterucci team up and gives us an article on Thrush and how the NY times sheds him?