Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
factfinder_77
factfinder_77's Journal
factfinder_77's Journal
May 15, 2016
https://np.reddit.com/r/NevadaForSanders/comments/4jd7nq/where_is_everybody/d35vi8d
In case you're wondering about those 64 delegates who didn't get seated.
https://np.reddit.com/r/NevadaForSanders/comments/4jd7nq/where_is_everybody/d35vi8d
May 15, 2016
Clinton won 20 pledged delegates to Sanders' 15 on the day of the FIRST caucus (months ago). Next, at the COUNTY convention level -- and in Clark County, the most populous in the state -- a lot of Clinton delegates didn't show up (in part owing to incorrect mailings and more sent by Sanders' campaign, say credible sources), so Sanders had more COUNTY delegates there, so people thought this would flip 2 pledged delegates to him AT THE STATE CONVENTION TODAY. However, today more Clinton state delegates showed up, so she got those 2 pledged delegates back
Final Nevada Delegate Count: Clinton 20- Sanders 15
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/NV-DClinton won 20 pledged delegates to Sanders' 15 on the day of the FIRST caucus (months ago). Next, at the COUNTY convention level -- and in Clark County, the most populous in the state -- a lot of Clinton delegates didn't show up (in part owing to incorrect mailings and more sent by Sanders' campaign, say credible sources), so Sanders had more COUNTY delegates there, so people thought this would flip 2 pledged delegates to him AT THE STATE CONVENTION TODAY. However, today more Clinton state delegates showed up, so she got those 2 pledged delegates back
May 11, 2016
The FEC just issued Bernie Sanders' campaign 639 pages of apparent "excessive, prohibited, and impermissible contributions" for April 2016
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/847/201605100300045847/201605100300045847.pdf
Breaking news: FEC 639 pages of Sanders "excessive, prohibited, and impermissible contributions".
The FEC just issued Bernie Sanders' campaign 639 pages of apparent "excessive, prohibited, and impermissible contributions" for April 2016
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/847/201605100300045847/201605100300045847.pdf
May 11, 2016
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/nate-silver-trump-clinton-polls-223015
Nate Silver rips Trump-Clinton polls in 8-part Twitter rant
Nate Silver thinks it's time to pump the brakes on predicting the results of a Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton matchup in November.
"For f--k's sake, America. You're going to make go on a rant about general election polls -- in May?" the editor in chief of FiveThirtyEight wrote as part of a tweetstorm on Tuesday.
Silver said Clinton has an about 6 percent lead over Trump nationally, but cautioned: "It's early. Trump could win. Also, he could lose in a landslide." He added that Trump's presumptive nomination and Clinton's ongoing battle with Bernie Sanders could be having an effect "We'll know more in June."
The statistician said he wouldn't have polls of each state for "a few months."
He also warned his followers to check whether pollsters interview likely voters or registered voters.
"The election will go through a lot of twists and turns, and polls are noisy. Don't sweat individual polls or short-term fluctuations," Silver tweeted.
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/nate-silver-trump-clinton-polls-223015
May 10, 2016
Sen. Bernie Sanders has proposed paying for his proposals to transform large sectors of the government and the economy mainly through increased taxes on wealthy Americans. A pair of new studies published Monday suggests Sanders would not come up with enough money using this approach, and that the poor and the middle class would have to pay more than Sanders has projected in order to fund his ideas.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/09/the-17-trillion-problem-with-bernie-sanderss-health-care-plan-2/
No suprise there.
Sorry, Bernie fans. His health care plan is short $17,000,000,000,000
&w=1484Sen. Bernie Sanders has proposed paying for his proposals to transform large sectors of the government and the economy mainly through increased taxes on wealthy Americans. A pair of new studies published Monday suggests Sanders would not come up with enough money using this approach, and that the poor and the middle class would have to pay more than Sanders has projected in order to fund his ideas.
The studies, published jointly by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center and the Urban Institute in Washington, concludes that Sanders's plans are short a total of more than $18 trillion over a decade. His programs would cost the federal government about $33 trillion over that period, almost all of which would go toward Sanders's proposed system of national health insurance. Yet the Democratic presidential candidate has put forward just $15 trillion in new taxes, the authors concluded.
In principle, national health insurance could make many families better off overall, without imposing unsustainable burdens on the federal budget. For the system to work in terms of dollars and cents, though, the benefits would have to be less generous than they are in the system Sanders has proposed, or the taxes would have to be more onerous for the middle class, as they are in many European countries.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/09/the-17-trillion-problem-with-bernie-sanderss-health-care-plan-2/
No suprise there.
May 7, 2016
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-election_us_572cae72e4b016f378957726
Only 2 % of $383 million on campaign TV ads, was anti Sanders ads - and his name briefly mentioned
As The Huffington Post reported in mid-April, of the roughly $383 million spent on campaign television advertising in 2016, only about 2 percent was on anti-Sanders ads, much of which just briefly mentioned his name or featured his image.
People are pointing to his general election numbers as being stronger than Clintons, and thats largely a byproduct of the fact he hasnt seen incoming fire, said Brendan Nyhan, a political science professor at Dartmouth College and a columnist for The New York Times.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-election_us_572cae72e4b016f378957726
May 5, 2016
I am sick and tired of the Hillary is not more qualified BS
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511904123
May 5, 2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/05/the-sanders-campaigns-phony-math-on-superdelegates/
WP Fact Checker: The Sanders campaign’s phony math on superdelegates : Rated Four Pinocchios
The Sanders campaigns phony math on superdelegateshttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/05/05/the-sanders-campaigns-phony-math-on-superdelegates/
May 5, 2016
Clinton: "President Trump" is a dangerous proposition. Mitt Romney, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio agree.
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/727932354883248129
May 5, 2016
Rasmussen: Hillary only get 33 % of white votes, and leads with just 10 % among women against Trump
Seriously, if anyone thinks Rasmussen is on the ball, they are hallucinating
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:54 PMNumber of posts: 841