erronis
erronis's JournalCan Yale withdraw Kavanaugh's law degree, and if so would he lose his judgeships?
I know this wouldn't happen, but it is fun daydreaming.
Anyone else want more in the Title line than click-bait? "Do This Now!"
Why do I think that it would be just as easy to make a title like "Please vote now!" when that is the body of the rest of the post?
Are there points gained by having clicks through the title? Is this google or facebook?
While I'm mildly venting, perhaps DU could implement a hover text that shows the first 100 characters of the actual post without actually clicking through. I did this for a tiny company a decade ago in one day.
Bloomberg: Brett Kavanaugh Is Cursed Either Way
This is an exceptionally strong piece. I hope it presages the future.
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-09-21/brett-kavanaugh-is-cursed-either-way
If he makes it to the Supreme Court without being cleared, his ordeal won't be over.
One way or another, Brett Kavanaugh will have to pay.
...
Kavanaugh can wait to see if Fords allegations fall apart under questioning. Its possible shell prove a jumble of contradictions. But from what we know so far, its hard to imagine she would. Ford doesnt have to be sure of the color of paint on the wall 35 years ago. She only needs to be sure of the details of the attack as she has already described it.
Conservatives viewing her actions as a product of Democratic skulduggery fool themselves. Her allegations were problematic for Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, who first received them in confidence. If Democrats had plotted to weaponize the allegations for best effect, this late-inning muddle would not have resulted.
If McConnell is correct and Republicans manage to push Kavanaugh through to the high court, no matter what, Kavanaugh wont be out of the woods.
This is not 1991, when Anita Hill accused soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. And Kavanaugh, the beneficiary of virtually every privilege that status and education can afford, is not Thomas.
Democrats in 1991 were already the party of feminists. But many of the Democratic men in Congress Barbara Mikulski was the lone Democratic woman in the Senate were just as doltish toward a female accuser as Republican senators are today.
Thats no longer the case. Democrats have four women on the Judiciary Committee, and the men are so different from the cast of 1991 that Senator Chris Coons of Delaware has publicly mused that maybe he should cede his committee time to his two female colleagues who are former prosecutors and superior interviewers.
More important, the Republican Party of 1991 is not the party of 2018. The party leader then was George H.W. Bush, a war hero with pronounced social graces. The current leader is a habitual liar and crude demagogue who has been accused of sexual predation by more than a dozen women while continuing to behave as cad-in-chief.
The GOP of 2018 views the Supreme Court differently as well. Republicans were not facing electoral attrition in those days, desperately trying to sabotage the future. Republicans had held the presidency for three terms and were on the verge of a historic victory in the House over a corrupt and complacent Democratic majority.
Now, Republicans are investing in a partisan court to deliver partisan outcomes to advance partisan goals that are insulated from democratic accountability, such as elections and popular opinion, which Republicans increasingly fear.
...
I figgered it out! Trump and the repuglicon leaders are really trying to kill the party!
Everything they are doing is obviously to set the train down the track to self-destruction.
They were planted as saboteurs after being instructed at ivy-league and other schools.
I hope it works!
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Green Mountains
Home country: US
Member since: Tue Feb 5, 2013, 04:27 PM
Number of posts: 15,219