Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
sheshe2
sheshe2's Journal
sheshe2's Journal
March 27, 2013
Ball: Float. In. Air. #JediMindMeld
Nonchalant after doing Jedi Mind Meld thing
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/03/26/having-a-ball-6/
Having a ball
Ball: Float. In. Air. #JediMindMeld
Nonchalant after doing Jedi Mind Meld thing
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/03/26/having-a-ball-6/
March 26, 2013
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2013/03/passing-baton.html
The white male heterosexual patriarchy's death throes
SNIP:
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2012/02/white-male-heterosexual-patriarchys.html
The Fighters, The Dreamers, The Believers.....Powerful
There is so much more at both links
Passing the baton
He calls the first generation The Fighters. They would encompass those leaders who - beginning in the 1950's - fought the legal battles against discrimination. The list is long, but includes people like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, Malcolm X, Rep. John Lewis, Ella Baker, Cesar Chavez and Delores Huerta.
The next generation were The Dreamers. This is the generation that were the first to walk through the doors opened by the Fighters and continued the struggle for equality within the systems they entered. That generation - of course - includes President Barack Obama. But other public figures include his wife, Michelle Obama, Eric Holder, Sonia Sotomayor, Deval Patrick and Kamala Harris.
SNIP:
Julian Castro and his twin brother Rep. Joaquin Castro are representatives of the third generation - The Believers. We have yet to see what this generation can accomplish, but perhaps Mayor Castro's vision of being a "bridge-builder" says something about the role they will play.
Social change happens most effectively when cross-generational coalitions tap into both the wisdom of the elders and the passion of the young. That requires being willing to listen on the part of the young and a willingness to pass the baton on to the next generation by the elders.
The next generation were The Dreamers. This is the generation that were the first to walk through the doors opened by the Fighters and continued the struggle for equality within the systems they entered. That generation - of course - includes President Barack Obama. But other public figures include his wife, Michelle Obama, Eric Holder, Sonia Sotomayor, Deval Patrick and Kamala Harris.
SNIP:
Julian Castro and his twin brother Rep. Joaquin Castro are representatives of the third generation - The Believers. We have yet to see what this generation can accomplish, but perhaps Mayor Castro's vision of being a "bridge-builder" says something about the role they will play.
Social change happens most effectively when cross-generational coalitions tap into both the wisdom of the elders and the passion of the young. That requires being willing to listen on the part of the young and a willingness to pass the baton on to the next generation by the elders.
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2013/03/passing-baton.html
The white male heterosexual patriarchy's death throes
Lets be honest, Republicans have never made much of an attempt to woo the gay and lesbian vote. As a matter of fact, they've done everything they can to fight the so-called "gay agenda." But in a few days one of their darlings of the future, Governor Chris Christie, has promised to veto a gay marriage bill passed by both houses of the New Jersey legislature.
Gays and lesbians pissed off - check
Its also true that African Americans have been a common punching bag for Republicans for years now with their dog whistles that stir up the base. And the truth is - since the Civil Rights era - there's no constituency that has been more loyal to Democrats than African Americans. So the likelihood of them providing much Republican support in 2012 against the first African American president is pretty much nil anyway. So I suppose you might say that it wasn't a touch call to take the dog whistles up to quantum level in terms of racism about "Blah Americans" and do everything possible to keep them from being able to vote.
African Americans pissed off - check
SNIP:
But who would have thought that Republicans would take on the task of pissing off half the US population that happen to have a uterus (as well as those without one who support them)? And yet that's exactly what it looks like we're witnessing in the whole bru-ha-ha over access to contraception. I don't need to link to all the polls - I'm sure you've seen them by now. But you'd be hard pressed to find a woman these days who hasn't used these products either to prevent pregnancy, for other medical reasons, or both.
Female Americans pissed off - check
Gays and lesbians pissed off - check
Its also true that African Americans have been a common punching bag for Republicans for years now with their dog whistles that stir up the base. And the truth is - since the Civil Rights era - there's no constituency that has been more loyal to Democrats than African Americans. So the likelihood of them providing much Republican support in 2012 against the first African American president is pretty much nil anyway. So I suppose you might say that it wasn't a touch call to take the dog whistles up to quantum level in terms of racism about "Blah Americans" and do everything possible to keep them from being able to vote.
African Americans pissed off - check
SNIP:
But who would have thought that Republicans would take on the task of pissing off half the US population that happen to have a uterus (as well as those without one who support them)? And yet that's exactly what it looks like we're witnessing in the whole bru-ha-ha over access to contraception. I don't need to link to all the polls - I'm sure you've seen them by now. But you'd be hard pressed to find a woman these days who hasn't used these products either to prevent pregnancy, for other medical reasons, or both.
Female Americans pissed off - check
SNIP:
This isn't rational. As much progress as we've seen over the decades on the racism/sexism/homophobia on which this country was founded, the white male heterosexual patriarchy has still assumed it was in charge. Those days are numbered now and everyone knows it...the beast is in its death throes. And in the process, its lashing out at every available target it perceives as a threat.
Time to let it die.
Time to let it die.
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2012/02/white-male-heterosexual-patriarchys.html
March 26, 2013
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/26/but-but-gay-marriage-will-destroy-traditional-marriage/
Oh my!
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/26/but-but-gay-marriage-will-destroy-traditional-marriage/
March 26, 2013
North Dakota lawmakers on Friday approved a proposed amendment to the state constitution that could make the state the first to define life as beginning at conception, which would effectively outlaw all abortions.
__________
So a fetus is a person is North Dakota. Does this mean a fetus can be listed as a dependent to the IRS ?
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/25/welcome-to-north-dakota/
Cross posted from The Lounge
Welcome to North Dakota ;-(
North Dakota lawmakers on Friday approved a proposed amendment to the state constitution that could make the state the first to define life as beginning at conception, which would effectively outlaw all abortions.
__________
So a fetus is a person is North Dakota. Does this mean a fetus can be listed as a dependent to the IRS ?
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/25/welcome-to-north-dakota/
Cross posted from The Lounge
March 26, 2013
North Dakota lawmakers on Friday approved a proposed amendment to the state constitution that could make the state the first to define life as beginning at conception, which would effectively outlaw all abortions.
__________
So a fetus is a person is North Dakota. Does this mean a fetus can be listed as a dependent to the IRS ?
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/25/welcome-to-north-dakota/
Welcome to North Dakota ;-(
North Dakota lawmakers on Friday approved a proposed amendment to the state constitution that could make the state the first to define life as beginning at conception, which would effectively outlaw all abortions.
__________
So a fetus is a person is North Dakota. Does this mean a fetus can be listed as a dependent to the IRS ?
http://allhatnocattle.net/blog7/2013/03/25/welcome-to-north-dakota/
March 26, 2013
The Ministry of Magic Takes on Rape Culture
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
http://angryblackladychronicles.com/2013/03/25/the-ministry-of-magic-takes-on-rape-culture/
March 25, 2013
LIL Barack
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
More here:
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/03/25/rise-and-shine-464/
March 23, 2013
*****Sorry the first link I posted didn't work....click the second one for more*****
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/30/our-bodies-ourselves-turns-40-why-the-women-s-
sexual-health-book-still-matters.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/30/our-bodies-ourselves-turns-40-why-the-women-s-sexual-health-book-still-matters.html
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
41 years ago...Why it still matters.
Sep 30, 2011
Forty years after the text was first released, Our Bodies, Ourselves has gone through various revamps: nine editions, 25 translations, e-books, education campaignseven a pink book cover that caused more than a bit of feminist eye-rolling. The latest edition, a whopping 825 pages, will be released next week, with new chapters on date rape, body image and plastic surgerya new edition for a new era, the authors gush. In its honor, Boston University is hosting a public-health symposium; at Harvard, undergraduates can peruse the changing artistry of body hair in a library exhibit of the early editions. With four million copies sold already, the authors hope to reach a new cohort of young women.
But in an age where every 12-year-old girl can learn about the female anatomy on Google, does Our Bodies, Ourselves still matter? In the beginning, the authors of the book were just 12 women, none of them medical experts, whod met at a Boston womens conference, bonding over their inability to find a good doctor. They started gathering in the basement of an Armenian church, andsuddenly realizing how little they knew about their own anatomydecided to write down their thoughts. Abortion, child-bearing, birth control, lesbianismnothing was off-limits to these women, who believed, rightly, that with better knowledge, women would be better equipped to deal with their own health.
At the time, abortion was illegal. Female doctors were virtually unheard of in many areas. There was little, if any, sex education in schools. So when the groupwhod later call themselves the Boston Womens Health Book Collectivedecided to release a 193-page pamphlet called Women and Their Bodies (what would ultimately become Our Bodies, Ourselves) it was nothing short of revolutionary. Our Bodies, Ourselves transformed peoples understanding, says historian Wendy Kline, a professor at the University of Cincinnati and the author of Bodies of Knowledge, about the books influence. It was revolutionary both because it provided so much information, but also because that information was, for the first time, in lay-peoples terms.
Our Bodies, Ourselves is still easy to read and simple to understand. But over the years, its had to change its tone. (See: 5 Ways the Text Has Changed.) Gone is the anti-patriarchy bent, as well as the iconic raised fist that once graced the title page of the original hand-printed 1970 edition. No longer do the authors proclaim, We must destroy the myth that we have to be groovy, free chicks. (Do we even know what that means?) Instead of essays on capitalism, there are chapters on changes in the healthcare system, environmental health risks, and how to be an activist in the 21st century (less marches, more Twitter).
Tell Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and other anti-choice politicians to please read, quips Erica Jong.
But in an age where every 12-year-old girl can learn about the female anatomy on Google, does Our Bodies, Ourselves still matter? In the beginning, the authors of the book were just 12 women, none of them medical experts, whod met at a Boston womens conference, bonding over their inability to find a good doctor. They started gathering in the basement of an Armenian church, andsuddenly realizing how little they knew about their own anatomydecided to write down their thoughts. Abortion, child-bearing, birth control, lesbianismnothing was off-limits to these women, who believed, rightly, that with better knowledge, women would be better equipped to deal with their own health.
At the time, abortion was illegal. Female doctors were virtually unheard of in many areas. There was little, if any, sex education in schools. So when the groupwhod later call themselves the Boston Womens Health Book Collectivedecided to release a 193-page pamphlet called Women and Their Bodies (what would ultimately become Our Bodies, Ourselves) it was nothing short of revolutionary. Our Bodies, Ourselves transformed peoples understanding, says historian Wendy Kline, a professor at the University of Cincinnati and the author of Bodies of Knowledge, about the books influence. It was revolutionary both because it provided so much information, but also because that information was, for the first time, in lay-peoples terms.
Our Bodies, Ourselves is still easy to read and simple to understand. But over the years, its had to change its tone. (See: 5 Ways the Text Has Changed.) Gone is the anti-patriarchy bent, as well as the iconic raised fist that once graced the title page of the original hand-printed 1970 edition. No longer do the authors proclaim, We must destroy the myth that we have to be groovy, free chicks. (Do we even know what that means?) Instead of essays on capitalism, there are chapters on changes in the healthcare system, environmental health risks, and how to be an activist in the 21st century (less marches, more Twitter).
Tell Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin and other anti-choice politicians to please read, quips Erica Jong.
*****Sorry the first link I posted didn't work....click the second one for more*****
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/30/our-bodies-ourselves-turns-40-why-the-women-s-
sexual-health-book-still-matters.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/30/our-bodies-ourselves-turns-40-why-the-women-s-sexual-health-book-still-matters.html
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
March 23, 2013
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-audacity-of-trust.html
The audacity of trust
SNIP:
Since those days I've often thought about the healing power of trust. It is a powerful elixir that most of us are too fearful to extend to others - much less ourselves. We are so broken inside from our disappointments that we spend enormous amounts of energy protecting our vulnerability.
I have also come to believe that much of the fearless soul-searching work that Barack Obama did in his young adulthood (as was written about in Dreams From My Father) must have involved a reckoning with this brokenness and vulnerability because he reminds me of Professor Anderson in his willingness to trust people so fearlessly.
SNIP:
Imagine that...going into the most conflict-ridden part of the world today and talking about the fact that Jews and Muslims and Palestinians "hold more hopes in common than fears that drive us apart." Now THAT's audacious! He championed hope in a place that is plagued by fear because he trusts the audience he was speaking to.
I believe that's why they responded so powerfully to what he had to say - because that was my own personal response to a trust so fearlessly extended. That kind of gift from another person wakes up your soul.
And so I was reminded once again that we are privileged to be living in an era with this man as our leader. People like him don't come around very often...I've run into 2 during my 50+ years on this earth. Both of them were human with all of the limitations that ensures. But having wrestled with their own inadequacies, they also had the strength and courage to extend the audacity of trust.
I have also come to believe that much of the fearless soul-searching work that Barack Obama did in his young adulthood (as was written about in Dreams From My Father) must have involved a reckoning with this brokenness and vulnerability because he reminds me of Professor Anderson in his willingness to trust people so fearlessly.
SNIP:
Imagine that...going into the most conflict-ridden part of the world today and talking about the fact that Jews and Muslims and Palestinians "hold more hopes in common than fears that drive us apart." Now THAT's audacious! He championed hope in a place that is plagued by fear because he trusts the audience he was speaking to.
I believe that's why they responded so powerfully to what he had to say - because that was my own personal response to a trust so fearlessly extended. That kind of gift from another person wakes up your soul.
And so I was reminded once again that we are privileged to be living in an era with this man as our leader. People like him don't come around very often...I've run into 2 during my 50+ years on this earth. Both of them were human with all of the limitations that ensures. But having wrestled with their own inadequacies, they also had the strength and courage to extend the audacity of trust.
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-audacity-of-trust.html
Profile Information
Member since: Sat Oct 13, 2012, 08:33 PMNumber of posts: 83,898