Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
friendly_iconoclast
friendly_iconoclast's Journal
friendly_iconoclast's Journal
July 5, 2018
Steve Daines (R) tweets photos purportedly showing him in DC while he's actually in Moscow:
Merely the latest from the party of quislings, would-be Gileadites, racists, and grifters:
https://twitter.com/SteveDaines/status/1014668830768058370
https://twitter.com/SteveDaines/status/1014681813548232705
https://twitter.com/RobertHolzer/status/1014711649205477376
July 5, 2018
Too fucking true: "Hey Democrats, Fighting Fair Is for Suckers"
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/07/04/democrats-majority-rules-norms-trump-2020-218947If Democrats are wise, they will embrace President Donald Trumps demonstration that there no longer are any unwritten rules in American politics. (Ive come to think that the key text for understanding our era is the 1997 movie Air Bud: Theres no rule that says a dog cant play basketball.) Democrats should be preparing to exercise power, beginning as early as 2020, with that lesson in mind.
As we all know, Trump and the Republican Party that enables him eat norms for breakfast. A norm is a tacit and mutual agreement that certain exercises of power, while lawful, also are unthinkable. As a result, a willingness to think the unthinkable is itself a source of power. With that willingness, you can deny a president a hearing on a Supreme Court nominee. You can threaten to jail your political opponents and call an election rigged if you dont win. You can demand investigations of your enemies, you can fire the FBI director investigating you, and you can quite possibly pardon yourself for federal crimes.
Trump and Republicans are not interested in self-restraint. We ought to be past surprise, for example, that the let the people decide standard invented by Mitch McConnell to block Merrick Garlands Supreme Court nomination no longer applies now that Trump can choose a successor for Anthony Kennedy. Those who care about the future of liberal democracy in this country ought to be beyond outrage and ready for something altogether colder and more disciplined.
Democrats should plan to treat political norms, when and if theyre in charge of a unified government, the way Trump and the Republicans do. They should be readying a program of systematic norm-breaking for partisan advantagebut only if they are willing and able to follow it through to its conclusion.
As we all know, Trump and the Republican Party that enables him eat norms for breakfast. A norm is a tacit and mutual agreement that certain exercises of power, while lawful, also are unthinkable. As a result, a willingness to think the unthinkable is itself a source of power. With that willingness, you can deny a president a hearing on a Supreme Court nominee. You can threaten to jail your political opponents and call an election rigged if you dont win. You can demand investigations of your enemies, you can fire the FBI director investigating you, and you can quite possibly pardon yourself for federal crimes.
Trump and Republicans are not interested in self-restraint. We ought to be past surprise, for example, that the let the people decide standard invented by Mitch McConnell to block Merrick Garlands Supreme Court nomination no longer applies now that Trump can choose a successor for Anthony Kennedy. Those who care about the future of liberal democracy in this country ought to be beyond outrage and ready for something altogether colder and more disciplined.
Democrats should plan to treat political norms, when and if theyre in charge of a unified government, the way Trump and the Republicans do. They should be readying a program of systematic norm-breaking for partisan advantagebut only if they are willing and able to follow it through to its conclusion.
July 3, 2018
Tacoma hit with $300,000 fine for improperly withholding records about surveillance device
https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/watchdog/article214028374.htmlA Pierce County judge has ordered the City of Tacoma to pay nearly $300,000 in penalties and fees for violating the state's Public Records Act regarding documents dealing with a police surveillance tool called a cell site simulator.
Superior Court Judge G. Helen Whitener ruled earlier this year that the city improperly withheld 11 documents from the American Civil Liberties Union. On Monday, Whitener issued a ruling tallying the cost
Whitener said in her ruling that the city deliberately withheld several documents that should have been provided, including spreadsheet with entries that included cell site simulator uses, records provided to 37 prior requestors and emails between the city and the FBI...
Superior Court Judge G. Helen Whitener ruled earlier this year that the city improperly withheld 11 documents from the American Civil Liberties Union. On Monday, Whitener issued a ruling tallying the cost
▪ $182,340 for violations of the Public Records Act.
▪ $115,530 for attorney fees and other costs.
Whitener said in her ruling that the city deliberately withheld several documents that should have been provided, including spreadsheet with entries that included cell site simulator uses, records provided to 37 prior requestors and emails between the city and the FBI...
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Sep 8, 2006, 12:47 PMNumber of posts: 15,333