Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Starry Messenger
Starry Messenger's Journal
Starry Messenger's Journal
February 21, 2016
I think it has more to do with Sanders than socialism.
Sanders' has stated that his approach is to bring back the New Deal coalition (white working class.) That coalition broke up with itself over civil rights though, I think this election will be the final break up with the left's old love affair with bringing that back as a path to victory.
Any socialist looking for gains is going to have to reach deeply into the population that approves of it more highly and find out together what we can build in the future.
AA and Latinos poll higher than whites in approval of socialism and disapproval of capitalism
http://www.people-press.org/2011/12/28/little-change-in-publics-response-to-capitalism-socialism/?src=prc-headlineI think it has more to do with Sanders than socialism.
Sanders' has stated that his approach is to bring back the New Deal coalition (white working class.) That coalition broke up with itself over civil rights though, I think this election will be the final break up with the left's old love affair with bringing that back as a path to victory.
Any socialist looking for gains is going to have to reach deeply into the population that approves of it more highly and find out together what we can build in the future.
February 14, 2016
The unexpected death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia this weekend will scramble much more than just election-year politics. It could recast several decisions pending before the high court, including arguably the most important labor case in years.
With Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, the courts conservative majority had the opportunity to make the entire U.S. public sector akin to a right-to-work zone. That would have given hundreds of thousands of public-sector workers the prerogative to opt out of funding the unions that represent them -- delivering a substantial blow to both organized labor and the Democratic Party it pours money into.
But with a 4-4 split in the court along ideological lines, theres now a good chance that the lower courts ruling in favor of the union will stand.
t didnt always seems so. During recent oral arguments, the conservative justices appeared eager to overturn long-standing legal precedent and ban so-called fair share fees. Unions must represent all workers in a bargaining unit -- even those who dont want representation -- so where state law allows it, workers can be required to pay fair share fees to help cover the cost of collective bargaining. For unions, such an arrangement assures that no worker gets representation for free.
<snip>
This is a big fucking deal.
Edit, I was so happy, I forgot the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scalia-public-sector-unions_us_56bfdb1ce4b0b40245c6f855
How Scalia’s Death May Grant Public-Sector Unions A Reprieve
A potentially devastating ruling for organized labor may no longer come to pass.
The unexpected death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia this weekend will scramble much more than just election-year politics. It could recast several decisions pending before the high court, including arguably the most important labor case in years.
With Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, the courts conservative majority had the opportunity to make the entire U.S. public sector akin to a right-to-work zone. That would have given hundreds of thousands of public-sector workers the prerogative to opt out of funding the unions that represent them -- delivering a substantial blow to both organized labor and the Democratic Party it pours money into.
But with a 4-4 split in the court along ideological lines, theres now a good chance that the lower courts ruling in favor of the union will stand.
t didnt always seems so. During recent oral arguments, the conservative justices appeared eager to overturn long-standing legal precedent and ban so-called fair share fees. Unions must represent all workers in a bargaining unit -- even those who dont want representation -- so where state law allows it, workers can be required to pay fair share fees to help cover the cost of collective bargaining. For unions, such an arrangement assures that no worker gets representation for free.
<snip>
This is a big fucking deal.
Edit, I was so happy, I forgot the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scalia-public-sector-unions_us_56bfdb1ce4b0b40245c6f855
Profile Information
Name: Decline to StateGender: Female
Hometown: Sacramento, CA
Home country: USA
Current location: Left Coast
Member since: Sat Apr 9, 2005, 08:01 PM
Number of posts: 32,342