Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

LetMyPeopleVote's Journal
LetMyPeopleVote's Journal
March 12, 2023

Happy birthday to the @GirlScouts !

I was the cookie dad for both of my daughters
https://twitter.com/RepFletcher/status/1634996525326819329

March 12, 2023

SLEEPERS AWAKE: DeSantis is losing steam thanks to weak "anti-woke" agenda

The term "woke" is not a negative except to MAGA nutcases
https://twitter.com/OccupyDemocrats/status/1634984690007576576
https://washingtonpress.com/2023/03/12/desantis-is-losing-steam-thanks-to-weak-anti-woke-agenda/

For the uninitiated, uncool, superwhite kids in the back of the study hall, “woke” comes from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) and means “alert to racial prejudice and discrimination”.

Mediocre White men just can’t tolerate the notion that our nation was anything except a pristine Whites-Only haven where the land was rightfully theirs no matter how many Brown people were there first.

“Florida is where woke goes to die,” DeSantis cringed when he was sworn in for a second term earlier this year (you know, when he wouldn’t answer whether or not he was going to run in 2024 and then introduced a bill allowing Governors to run for President before their term is over, weird!)

Tiny D isn’t going to get far with this, according to a new Ipsos/USA Today poll showing that 56% of Americans consider “woke” a positive term, meaning “to be informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices.”

Go back to bed, DeathSantis, nobody who’s actually “woke” is going to follow you to their own deaths.
https://twitter.com/IAmJohnAles/status/1634954366905098241
https://twitter.com/jennobenno/status/1634620585287331844
March 12, 2023

U.S. officials weigh protecting all deposits at Silicon Valley Bank

Currently, deposits up to $250,000 per depositor are insured. If the FDIC sells the bank, deposits above that amount may be out of luck. I have seen projections that there are assets that my cover up to 90% of the deposits above $250,000 that process will take time. If the FDIC cannot sell the bank, then there may be a reorganization where all deposits are guaranteed
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1634987497485901824

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2023/03/12/silicon-valley-bank-deposits/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=wp_main#:~:text=Selling%20SVB%20to,U.S.%20banks.

Federal authorities are seriously considering safeguarding all uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank, weighing an extraordinary intervention to prevent what they fear would be a panic in the U.S. financial system, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private deliberations.

Officials at the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation discussed the idea this weekend, the people said, with only hours to go before financial markets opened in Asia. White House officials have also studied the idea, per two separate people familiar with those discussions

The plan would be among the potential policy responses if the government is unable to find a buyer for the failed bank. The FDIC began an auction process for SVB on Saturday and hoped to identify a winning bidder Sunday afternoon, with final bids due at 2 p.m. ET, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Selling SVB to a healthy institution remains the preferred solution, officials have told members of Congress. Most bank failures are resolved that way and enable depositors to avoid losing any money.

Although the FDIC insures bank deposits up to $250,000, a provision in federal banking law may give them the authority to protect the uninsured deposits as well if they conclude that failing to do so would pose a systemic risk to the broader financial system, the people said. In that event, uninsured deposits could be backstopped by an insurance fund, paid into regularly by U.S. banks.
March 12, 2023

U.S. officials weigh protecting all deposits at Silicon Valley Bank

Source: Washington Post

Federal authorities are seriously considering safeguarding all uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank, weighing an extraordinary intervention to prevent what they fear would be a panic in the U.S. financial system, according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private deliberations.

Officials at the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation discussed the idea this weekend, the people said, with only hours to go before financial markets opened in Asia. White House officials have also studied the idea, per two separate people familiar with those discussions

The plan would be among the potential policy responses if the government is unable to find a buyer for the failed bank. The FDIC began an auction process for SVB on Saturday and hoped to identify a winning bidder Sunday afternoon, with final bids due at 2 p.m. ET, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Selling SVB to a healthy institution remains the preferred solution, officials have told members of Congress. Most bank failures are resolved that way and enable depositors to avoid losing any money.

Although the FDIC insures bank deposits up to $250,000, a provision in federal banking law may give them the authority to protect the uninsured deposits as well if they conclude that failing to do so would pose a systemic risk to the broader financial system, the people said. In that event, uninsured deposits could be backstopped by an insurance fund, paid into regularly by U.S. banks.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2023/03/12/silicon-valley-bank-deposits/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=wp_main



https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1634987497485901824
March 12, 2023

Busted: Trump attorneys headed to court to explain two-trial deadline scam

This will be fun to watch
https://twitter.com/RawStory/status/1634608724206575616
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-attorneys-2659583715/

Donald Trump's legal team have been given a deadline of Wednesday to explain themselves after a fellow attorney ratted them out for double-booking trial appearances in an effort to get around court-imposed deadlines.

According to a report from the Daily Beast's Jose Pagliery, the former president's penchant for dragging out legal proceedings has come back to haunt his attorneys who are battling investigations on multiple fronts.

That, in turn, appears to have led several of his attorneys to try and pull a fast one on two different judges in order to gain more time.

As Pagliery wrote, "Trump’s lawyers have until Wednesday to explain how they tried to play two New York judges off each other by double-booking trials to potentially delay them both," before adding, "Trump already pushed back a potential late 2023 trial over duping investors to Jan. 2024, citing a conflict with the New York Attorney General’s trial over his fake financial statements to banks. But when Trump’s team recently sought to delay that AG trial, they got caught."

The report notes that they might have gotten away with it if a fellow attorney didn't alert "U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield in federal court and Justice Arthur F. Engoron in state court that they may be getting played."

The report adds attorney Roberta Kaplan wrote to the two judges, explaining, "Donald Trump has a history of leveraging his presidential-campaign activities to delay and avoid judicial proceedings. We anticipated that, should the case schedule run into 2024, Mr. Trump will begin to argue that his campaign obligations must take precedence over his participation in this case, including at trial.”

March 12, 2023

Judge in abortion-pill lawsuit schedules hearing but delays announcing it

This is going to be good news
https://twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1634754458172178432
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/11/texas-abortion-pill-hearing-kacsmaryk/

The Texas judge who could undo government approval of a key abortion drug has scheduled the first hearing in the case for Wednesday but took unusual steps to keep it from being publicized, according to people familiar with the plans.

The hearing will be an opportunity for lawyers for the Justice Department, the company that makes the drug and the conservative group that is challenging it to argue their positions before U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. After they do, the judge could rule at any time.

Kacsmaryk scheduled the hearing during a call with attorneys Friday, said multiple people familiar with the call, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it. Kacsmaryk said he would delay putting the hearing on the public docket until late Tuesday to try to minimize disruptions and possible protests, and asked the lawyers on the call not to share information about it before then, the people said.

Public access to federal court proceedings is a key principle of the American judicial system, and Kacsmaryk’s apparent delay in placing the hearing on the docket is highly unusual. The judge and his staff did not respond to emails requesting comment on Saturday evening.....

By waiting to publicize the time of the hearing, Kacsmaryk and his staff could make it difficult for the public, the media and others to travel to the courthouse in Amarillo, Tex. The rural, deeply conservative city has few direct flights except from Dallas or San Antonio and is at least a four-hour drive from any of the state’s major, heavily-Democratic cities. Still, over 150 abortion rights advocates gathered there on a Saturday in mid-February to voice their support for abortion pills.
March 12, 2023

Judge in abortion-pill lawsuit schedules hearing but delays announcing it

Source: Washington Post

The Texas judge who could undo government approval of a key abortion drug has scheduled the first hearing in the case for Wednesday but took unusual steps to keep it from being publicized, according to people familiar with the plans.

The hearing will be an opportunity for lawyers for the Justice Department, the company that makes the drug and the conservative group that is challenging it to argue their positions before U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. After they do, the judge could rule at any time.

Kacsmaryk scheduled the hearing during a call with attorneys Friday, said multiple people familiar with the call, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it. Kacsmaryk said he would delay putting the hearing on the public docket until late Tuesday to try to minimize disruptions and possible protests, and asked the lawyers on the call not to share information about it before then, the people said.

Public access to federal court proceedings is a key principle of the American judicial system, and Kacsmaryk’s apparent delay in placing the hearing on the docket is highly unusual. The judge and his staff did not respond to emails requesting comment on Saturday evening......

By waiting to publicize the time of the hearing, Kacsmaryk and his staff could make it difficult for the public, the media and others to travel to the courthouse in Amarillo, Tex. The rural, deeply conservative city has few direct flights except from Dallas or San Antonio and is at least a four-hour drive from any of the state’s major, heavily-Democratic cities. Still, over 150 abortion rights advocates gathered there on a Saturday in mid-February to voice their support for abortion pills.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/03/11/texas-abortion-pill-hearing-kacsmaryk/



https://twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1634754458172178432
March 12, 2023

Conspiracy theorist Jacob Wohl tried to trick Black New Yorkers out of voting, judge rules

I love the fact that Wohl was found to violate the KKK Act. TFG is being sued under the KKK Act.
https://twitter.com/BuddhistNoBody/status/1633647754680344580
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jacob-wohl-black-voters-new-york-ruling-b2296968.html

Conspiracy theorist and far right activist Jacob Wohl violated the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) Act when he and an associate tried to trick Black voters in New York out of voting, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

Mr Wohl was accused over his role in an operation in which robocalls were sent to thousands of mainly non-white voters before the 2020 election falsely warning them that their personal information would be added to a public database and used by police departments and credit card companies.....

US District Judge Victor Marrero wrote in his ruling that it was clear Mr Wohl and his associate Jack Burkman wanted to “deny the right to vote specifically to Black voters.”
https://twitter.com/NewYorkStateAG/status/1633613598915174400
March 12, 2023

White House stops holding back, slams Tucker Carlson by name

I am glad that Biden White House is calling out Tucker
https://twitter.com/stevebenen/status/1633559503244513280
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/white-house-stops-holding-back-slams-tucker-carlson-name-rcna74025

Today, as Politico reported, the president’s team broke new ground.

The White House joined in widespread condemnation of Fox News star Tucker Carlson on Wednesday, singling out the prime-time ratings king for his misleading portrayal of the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. In comments shared first with POLITICO, the White House joined Republican Senate leaders and Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger, who a day earlier assailed Carlson’s broadcasts of selected assault footage as being “filled with offensive and misleading conclusions.”


“We agree with the chief of the Capitol Police and the wide range of bipartisan lawmakers who have condemned this false depiction of the unprecedented, violent attack on our Constitution and the rule of law — which cost police officers their lives,” Bates said.


The presidential spokesperson added, “We also agree with what Fox News’s own attorneys and executives have now repeatedly stressed in multiple courts of law: that Tucker Carlson is not credible.”

At face value, this might not seem especially provocative. A Democratic White House taking rhetorical shots at outlet aligned with Republican politics is probably in line with many observers’ expectations.

But these developments aren’t normal at all: The Biden White House does not generally engage in these fights, and Democratic leaders on the Hill do not routinely slam outlets or specific television personalities.

As Fox News deals with cascading controversies, the Democratic Party’s entire approach to the network is changing quickly — on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.


Profile Information

Member since: Mon Apr 5, 2004, 04:58 PM
Number of posts: 145,086
Latest Discussions»LetMyPeopleVote's Journal