LetMyPeopleVote
LetMyPeopleVote's JournalMike Luckovich: Mighty Casey strikes out
:largeSotomayor's Dissent in the Big Voter-Purge Case Points to How the Law Might Still Be Struck Down
I agree with Prof. Hasen on this. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/sonia-sotomayors-husted-dissent-points-the-way-forward-on-racist-voter-purge-laws.html
Justice Sotomayor pointed out that another provision of the Motor Voter law requires that any removal program be uniform, nondiscriminatory, and in compliance with the Voting Rights Act, and this part of the law provides a potential path forward. As more states enact laws like Ohios, it will become further apparent that these laws have discriminatory effects.
And aside from lawsuits, worries about voter suppression have energized the left to fight such laws politically. In at least some states, discriminatory laws like Ohios can be fought through legislative battles and at the ballot box.
In 2008, the SCOTUS rejected a facial challenge to the Indiana voter id law. In 2014 a federal district judge found that the Texas voter id law discriminated against minorities. Here is a chart that shows the effect of the Texas voter id law on Democratic turnout
Greg Abbott got more votes in 2014 compared to Rick Perry while Wendy Davis got far fewer votes even though she spent more.
In 2016 the 5th Circuit affirmed this ruling and the Texas voter id law was largely gutted so that any registered voter can vote if they lack one of the approved ids and sign a Reasonable Impediment Declaration and provide one of the alternative ids which includes utility bills or bank statements. For college students, out of state drivers license are an approved id
This lawsuit is not the end of the issue. There will be further litigation after there evidence is developed to show that this law has an adverse impact on minorities. The roadmap has been set by the Texas voter id litigation.
Luckovich: Summit preparation
:largeFox News reportedly having difficulty selling ads for Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham's shows
This makes me smile https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2018/06/04/fox-news-reportedly-having-difficulty-selling-ads-sean-hannity-and-laura-ingraham-s-shows-pro-trump/220370
According to a report by Gabriel Sherman in Vanity Fair, the network is struggling to sell ad space on their 9 and 10 PM respective programs.
While Fox News dominated the ratings in Maya fact Trump bragged about on Saturdaythe network is having new difficulties monetizing its most pro-Trump programming. According to three sources briefed on the numbers, advertising revenues for Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham are down in recent months. The pro-Trump thing isnt working. We cant monetize DACA and the wall and that right-wing shit, one staffer said. Despite all the hype on Hannity, they cant sell it, another insider told me. (Tucker Carlsons show is faring better, sources said).
This follows an October 2017 report that Fox News ad revenue had dropped 17% year over year, at the same time that ad revenue at other cable news networks was relatively stable.
Luckovich-expect more corruption
Judge Calls Trump's Border Separations of Children Brutal'
Source: bloomberg
The Trump administration failed to kill a legal challenge to its practice of separating undocumented parents and children who seek to enter the U.S. to flee persecution at home, with a judge handing an early victory to civil rights activists who say the policy is unconstitutional and cruel.
U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego on Wednesday denied a motion to dismiss the suit, in which the American Civil Liberties Union argues that splitting up families at the border violates their due process rights.
The practice, spearheaded by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, caused widespread outrage after images of children in detention centers circulated on social media. The government argues separations are necessary to properly prosecute adults who cross into the U.S. illegally, while activists say children are being used as pawns in an informal policy intended to deter migrants.
These allegations sufficiently describe government conduct that arbitrarily tears at the sacred bond between parent and child," the judge wrote. The conduct, if true, is brutal, offensive, and fails to comport with traditional notions of fair play and decency."
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-07/aclu-suit-over-child-separations-at-border-may-proceed-judge
American Muslims on Trump's iftar: Thanks, but no thanks
For diplomats only https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/05/politics/trump-iftar-muslims/index.html
On Wednesday, a White House spokesperson said Trump will host the iftar dinner in the State Dining Room at 8 p.m. ET "for the Washington diplomatic community."
In years past, White House iftars have invited not only diplomats but dozens of American Muslims from civil society, including corporate executives, scholars, activists and athletes.
BREAKING: Federal judge allows @ACLU lawsuit challenging family separation at the border to move for
https://twitter.com/cristianafarias/status/1004504478194774016Here is a link to the opinion
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4497680-Ms-L-v-ICE-Order.html
Mike Luckovich: Pardons r us
:largeProfile Information
Member since: Mon Apr 5, 2004, 04:58 PMNumber of posts: 145,046