Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Getting really tired of this. There is absolutely no explanation that makes any sense. (Original Post) redqueen Nov 2019 OP
A question of basic fairness and just... redqueen Nov 2019 #1
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Nov 2019 #2
I don't understand how this isn't blatantly obvious. redqueen Nov 2019 #13
after all it is not like there isnt a whole year until the election damn it SterlingPound Nov 2019 #3
3 months to primaries. Into 4th quarter. Not a year. Unless you want independants nt floppyboo Nov 2019 #4
that is more an example of the ridiculousness of our broken election system. SterlingPound Nov 2019 #5
What is ridiculous? That it is so long? And who bores everyone to death? floppyboo Nov 2019 #7
honestly id rather he be in DC SterlingPound Nov 2019 #8
I don't think the founders envisaged a media gong show floppyboo Nov 2019 #9
It would be a systematic overhaul forsure SterlingPound Nov 2019 #10
Apologies - I should have said 'people in general before mass media' floppyboo Nov 2019 #16
i guess that's what the DNC is though - or could be. Perez for President?? nt floppyboo Nov 2019 #17
I have been advocating for a overhaul for decades its a hatred that has lasted long before the last SterlingPound Nov 2019 #18
Hey - but Dems have the majority of Govs now, so don't stop speaking out! floppyboo Nov 2019 #20
I agree with both of those SterlingPound Nov 2019 #21
so do you think the governor's can do it? Would be sweet! floppyboo Nov 2019 #25
there are a couple of ways to do it and not all are preferable right now SterlingPound Nov 2019 #26
What does that have to do with including a candidate who dropped out weeks ago redqueen Nov 2019 #14
Yawn..... brooklynite Nov 2019 #6
Are you kidding me? The date of the polling is RIGHT THERE redqueen Nov 2019 #15
I'm talking about the media coverage slide brooklynite Nov 2019 #19
So you're seriously saying that including O'Rourke and omitting Yang is fair. redqueen Nov 2019 #22
I'm challenging the notion of intent... brooklynite Nov 2019 #23
So this pattern of erasure going back for months - redqueen Nov 2019 #24
What is a 15-second cable news clip? I don't understand what is being measured here. Midnight Writer Nov 2019 #11
They're reporting on recent polls. They included o'rourke redqueen Nov 2019 #12
Why should he have been in the graphic? FreeState Nov 2019 #27
He got 3% in the poll. O'Rourke isn't even running but was included redqueen Nov 2019 #28
No the data referenced is 1.4 FreeState Nov 2019 #29
In the second graphic Bennett is at 1% NT redqueen Nov 2019 #30
In the first graphic they're talking about news coverage. And Yang isn't even metnioned at all. redqueen Nov 2019 #31
In the first graphic he isn't mentioned because FreeState Nov 2019 #32
Correct - the one I posted was the second one, but for some reason it includes the one above it redqueen Nov 2019 #33
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
1. A question of basic fairness and just...
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 02:44 PM
Nov 2019

silence.

Wow.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Uncle Joe

(58,282 posts)
2. Kicked and recommended.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:09 PM
Nov 2019

Thanks for the thread redqueen.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
13. I don't understand how this isn't blatantly obvious.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:42 PM
Nov 2019

Is it really so hard to see the problem?

Really?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
3. after all it is not like there isnt a whole year until the election damn it
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:09 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
4. 3 months to primaries. Into 4th quarter. Not a year. Unless you want independants nt
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:11 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
5. that is more an example of the ridiculousness of our broken election system.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:13 PM
Nov 2019

IMO

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
7. What is ridiculous? That it is so long? And who bores everyone to death?
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:20 PM
Nov 2019

Yes, agreed. Way too much time for people to spend who are spending because that's all they've got.

Now Bernie, on the other hand, has a mission, and this long cycle is driving the message home, even if it is driving all the political junkies crazy!!! Same old spiel - over and over -doesn't need to shift it because it is his core - and his followers (me included) love to watch the huge rallies and people coming out! It is inspiring to see the numbers not only hang in but grow!

Love me some of that campaign and all the people working hard with passion!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
8. honestly id rather he be in DC
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:22 PM
Nov 2019

or back in his home state having a life instead of non stop campaigning.

I am all for a 2 month campaign cycle in total.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
9. I don't think the founders envisaged a media gong show
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:35 PM
Nov 2019

Being a canadian, and having much more civilized leadership contests (although arguably not less corrupt) which evade most of the media scrutiny - I can't agree more. But because of the parliamentary system, a leader is chosen when they have a no confidence vote - it's not a pageant - and then only those who are registered politely submit their choice by mail. [edit or attend a 3 day convention, easier if the party's contender pays your bus fare]
I'm not entirely sure this is better.
What do you see as an alternative?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
10. It would be a systematic overhaul forsure
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:38 PM
Nov 2019

but as for specifics i can only toss stuff into the conversation and hope they get picked up or just influence a few.

but for one at this point i dont give a hang about what the FF have to say anymore, i think i have heard quiet enough of other people telling me what our founding fathers thought.

and i am more interested in what works

and what we have right now isnt working.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
16. Apologies - I should have said 'people in general before mass media'
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:49 PM
Nov 2019

So, aside from being dis-satisfied, would you consider an electoral loss to be reason for a 'snap' kind of election? Then, a leader at the same level of the executive branch would have that much more time to make the party's case? While there is no formal seat for such a person, the media could non the less focus on that, rather than the circus.
I suppose that would have led to Sanders being the spokesperson after Clinton, as no one else was contesting. But if the rules allowed for the possibility that there would have been a number of contestants at the convention whose names would have come up, say, in the lame duck session, to become spokesperson - and the whole party would rally around - until 4 years were up... barring some unseemly event (vote of non-confidence - still less expensive than what is) - what do you think of that?

And I do apologize again. I have no idea what a rich white man was thinking when the constitution was written.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
17. i guess that's what the DNC is though - or could be. Perez for President?? nt
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:55 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
18. I have been advocating for a overhaul for decades its a hatred that has lasted long before the last
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:03 PM
Nov 2019

election

and honestly the last change of the millennium.

I have a brother that pushes for more of a parliamentarian system

i for one am not advocating a change of our government but a tweaks of the election system alone

i think we need an amendment at the federal election level that still leaves local state elections alone and our representation system alone( much to the chagrin of my brother,lol).


We need a change of campaign donation laws and one amendment that actually has been put up but not voted on is that only living beings can donate to our electors and that part curbs the big corporate money.

Then you still have to even up individual donations and that requires dealing with the pacs and how our politician can get bundled donations and that requires a different fix but can still be addressed on the amendment

i wont pretend to give an answer to what that would be because no matter what i said it won't but used anyway and usually just leads to digressions away from any real progress of the discussion from personal experience.

we also have to deal with Primaries at the federal level and yes that means stripping the power of when they will have them from the states NH and IOWA holding the rest of the nation hostage has become ridiculousness and a farce at the world level IMO.

there is undoubtedly lots more and as soon as i hit enter 20 more things will pop up but in discussions like this most of the ideals i have had have come and gone with age and senility, but the more we talk the more they come back

Our debates are a farce as well and honestly do more harm than good to our Nation.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
20. Hey - but Dems have the majority of Govs now, so don't stop speaking out!
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:18 PM
Nov 2019

Do you think it might be better if all the primaries were held on the same day? I feel that would be awesome if there was ranked choice voting. It would allow people more individual freedom to vote their convictions rather than strategically.

Also, I consider this a tangential thread to the original, so hit send, and sit back and send again! I am enjoying the discourse.

If there was a magical button here where you could hit - tangent ' and then it could turn into something more meaningful than an us versus them #character limit speak - I'd be so happy!

I am not a member of this board to stir up dust. I truly appreciate the thoughtful responses!
(ps - never mind that I love Elizabeth! First woman POTUS!)

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
21. I agree with both of those
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:28 PM
Nov 2019

Rank choice voting and Primaries on the same day


Hell, i would even be so magnanimous as to compromise with people and break the USA into three or four areas during the primary part of the election cycle and they can do those on week one to 4 and then have the general election shortly after

so they don't have to cover so much area in such a short time

but we do need some kind of amendment so that all of our citizens on the federal level can now vote under the same laws and restrictions,
we now have a quarter of our citizens at disenfranchised and mercy of corrupt state factions

And it is BULLSHIT AND NOTHING MORE!!!

this isn't the 1700 and FF's be damned

We need what works not what is tradition!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
25. so do you think the governor's can do it? Would be sweet!
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 05:23 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

SterlingPound

(428 posts)
26. there are a couple of ways to do it and not all are preferable right now
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 05:30 PM
Nov 2019

but id take any way that would work.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
14. What does that have to do with including a candidate who dropped out weeks ago
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:43 PM
Nov 2019

but omitting one that polled at 3% - same as Harris and Klobuchar?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
6. Yawn.....
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:20 PM
Nov 2019

If I have this right, you’re complaining that the media isn’t covering your candidate by hiding the amount of time the media is covering your candidate...

(FWIW the media coverage data was from a month ago when Beto was still in the race)

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
15. Are you kidding me? The date of the polling is RIGHT THERE
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:46 PM
Nov 2019

Nov 8-13


Now, think really hard - or better yet just Google it. When did O'Rourke drop out?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
19. I'm talking about the media coverage slide
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:10 PM
Nov 2019

And as for the polling, if they’re willing to show the strength of both progressives (Sanders, Warren) and moderates (Biden, Buttigieg), the notion that there’s an intent to “hide” Yang is silly.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
22. So you're seriously saying that including O'Rourke and omitting Yang is fair.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:32 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
23. I'm challenging the notion of intent...
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:35 PM
Nov 2019

The media is not out to get Yang. He’s failing to break in to the top tier on his own.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
24. So this pattern of erasure going back for months -
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 04:36 PM
Nov 2019

it's just coincidence?

What do you think is the perfectly logical explanation for including a candidate who dropped out weeks ago, but leaving off a candidate who is polling in 6th place?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Midnight Writer

(21,708 posts)
11. What is a 15-second cable news clip? I don't understand what is being measured here.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:38 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
12. They're reporting on recent polls. They included o'rourke
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 03:41 PM
Nov 2019

but left out Yang, who polled at 3% along with Harris and Klobuchar.

Is it really so hard to understand?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
28. He got 3% in the poll. O'Rourke isn't even running but was included
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 07:44 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
29. No the data referenced is 1.4
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 07:48 PM
Nov 2019

Lower than anyone in the graphic.

Here’s the source:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-media-frenzy-around-biden-is-fading/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
30. In the second graphic Bennett is at 1% NT
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 07:51 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
31. In the first graphic they're talking about news coverage. And Yang isn't even metnioned at all.
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 07:53 PM
Nov 2019

Seriously.

I just don't even know what to say anymore at this point.

I never expected so much energy to be expended in order to deny this is happening.

There aren't enough WTF gifs / smileys in the world to do this justice.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
32. In the first graphic he isn't mentioned because
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 07:57 PM
Nov 2019

He doesn’t fit on the chart - he fell below the lowest candidate mentioned.

These two graphics are not measuring the same thing, they aren’t comparable. I agree Yang should be in the second one.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
33. Correct - the one I posted was the second one, but for some reason it includes the one above it
Sun Nov 17, 2019, 08:00 PM
Nov 2019

which is super helpful /s

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Getting really tired of t...