Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

DIVINEprividence

(443 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:26 PM Sep 2019

If Warren were to drop Medicare for all

...for a public option within the ACA, she would run away with the nomination. I see Medicare for all as a serious problem in a general election. The public option is the better bet because you are leaving the choice with the consumer and not making claims about eliminating private insurance. Don't drink the Bernie koolaide Elizabeth!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Warren were to drop Medicare for all (Original Post) DIVINEprividence Sep 2019 OP
Buttigieg tells Medicare-for-all proponents to show their cards Gothmog Sep 2019 #1
Medicare for all is the least expensive option in the long run. GeorgeGist Sep 2019 #19
Societal savings are not tax revenues and cannot be used to pay for this program Gothmog Sep 2019 #22
Loss of freedom is a cost. Hortensis Sep 2019 #39
I will probably get ripped for this, but I see sticking with the ACA as a liability rurallib Sep 2019 #2
MfA would be extremely similar to Obamacare after the additional Hortensis Sep 2019 #40
it's one of the things that hurt Harris and allowed Biden to own the position JI7 Sep 2019 #3
No, she will lose without it. BeckyDem Sep 2019 #4
Yes, I see it as problematic in general compared to a public option for the reasons that themaguffin Sep 2019 #5
MEDICARE FOR ALL from Andrew Yang's website Sherman A1 Sep 2019 #6
Agree DURHAM D Sep 2019 #7
It's certainly better than nothing, but I think there's a widespread belief The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #10
I think the bigger problem is that DURHAM D Sep 2019 #17
It isn't free of course; I can use it now because I paid for it in advance The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #18
It is one of the things that I disagree with her. sheshe2 Sep 2019 #8
She needs to take a few days off from the campaign trail Funtatlaguy Sep 2019 #11
+1 ReformedGOPer Sep 2019 #33
She needs to come out with a web calculator so everyone can determine what MFA Hoyt Sep 2019 #9
The reality of MFA makes no difference in the short run. MontanaFarmer Sep 2019 #12
Wouldn't matter what Elizabeth's policies were crazytown Sep 2019 #13
There's a problem with that Bettie Sep 2019 #14
If Warren were to drop MFA at this point, that would be seen as betrayal by many of her highplainsdem Sep 2019 #15
I am union Tennessee Tuxedo Sep 2019 #16
I understand where you are coming from. And you are right to have that position. Blue_true Sep 2019 #21
You would still be better off with Medicare for All. athena Sep 2019 #37
I like Medicare for All that Want It as being an ACA public option. Blue_true Sep 2019 #20
I agree completely nt BlueMississippi Sep 2019 #23
So do I. Owl Sep 2019 #27
Medicare for All has a near 0 chance of ever becoming law anytime soon, elocs Sep 2019 #24
Medicare for all is bold and good for the movement. Joe941 Sep 2019 #25
So all of the seniors that like Medicare are deluded? guillaumeb Sep 2019 #26
If Florida Bull Sep 2019 #28
I feel like there's a lot of fear/angst by people that think they somehow won't have their same doc- NCLefty Sep 2019 #29
NBC/WSJ poll shows Biden's healthcare stance (optional Medicare buy-in) much more popular Gothmog Sep 2019 #30
There are honest differences on this issue. BlueWI Sep 2019 #31
Exactly. The truth is that America desperately needs Medicare for All. athena Sep 2019 #36
With you on this. BlueWI Sep 2019 #38
"Run away" might be a stretch, but it help convince a lot of people...myself included brooklynite Sep 2019 #32
Nice try, 39 Tarc Sep 2019 #34
Perfect ChubbyStar Sep 2019 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Sep 2019 #35
For this thread Gothmog Sep 2019 #42
Obamacare Has Made People Healthier Gothmog Oct 2019 #43
 

Gothmog

(143,999 posts)
1. Buttigieg tells Medicare-for-all proponents to show their cards
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:31 PM
Sep 2019

Against my better instincts, I am slowly beginning to like Mayor Pete.




Now, I’d like to get more detail on those “cost savings” and the “corporate tax reform” (and why aren’t Democrats promising to raise the capital gains tax rate to equal or nearly equal the rates for salary income, a much bigger revenue-generator?). Buttigieg also promises “additional plans to address issues such as drug pricing, innovation and health equity,” which will need to come with funding mechanisms.

Nevertheless, Buttigieg has a compelling argument: Candidates are obligated to offer bold ideas that are doable. He argues, “Rather than flipping a switch and kicking almost 160 million Americans off their private insurance, including 20 million seniors already choosing private plans within Medicare, my plan lets Americans keep a private plan if they want to.” The latter is a reference to Medicare
Advantage, which would go away under a strictly single-payer system.

The approach favored by Buttigieg, Biden, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and other moderates would be cheaper and allow people to gradually migrate to Medicare (if that is what they want). Moreover, if Democrats want to accomplish anything, it likely will require a Democratic majority in the Senate and use of reconciliation; they would at least need a majority. There is not, as we speak, a majority of Democrats in both houses who support Medicare-for-all.

Part of the problem with this discussion is that the Medicare-for-all advocates are adept at deflecting pesky questions about cost, logistics and political feasibility. They shouldn’t be allowed to skate by on ad hominem attacks (That’s a Republican talking point!) or non sequiturs (Let me tell you how great Medicare-for-all is!) or platitudes (We’re going to fight!).
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

GeorgeGist

(25,294 posts)
19. Medicare for all is the least expensive option in the long run.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 09:51 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Gothmog

(143,999 posts)
22. Societal savings are not tax revenues and cannot be used to pay for this program
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 12:53 AM
Sep 2019

Such a plan in theory may generate societal savings but such savings would not pay for a program. Governments can only spend tax revenues and/or borrowings. This study does not say how one would pay for such a program in the real world. I note that Prof. Krugman like the concepts of such a plan in theory but notes that taxes will have to be raised a great deal to pay for such a plan
Back in 2016, here is his position Prof. Krugman compares Sanders hoped for health care savings to the GOP tax cuts. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/19/weakened-at-bernies/?_r=0

On health care: leave on one side the virtual impossibility of achieving single-payer. Beyond the politics, the Sanders “plan” isn’t just lacking in detail; as Ezra Klein notes, it both promises more comprehensive coverage than Medicare or for that matter single-payer systems in other countries, and assumes huge cost savings that are at best unlikely given that kind of generosity. This lets Sanders claim that he could make it work with much lower middle-class taxes than would probably be needed in practice.

To be harsh but accurate: the Sanders health plan looks a little bit like a standard Republican tax-cut plan, which relies on fantasies about huge supply-side effects to make the numbers supposedly add up. Only a little bit: after all, this is a plan seeking to provide health care, not lavish windfalls on the rich — and single-payer really does save money, whereas there’s no evidence that tax cuts deliver growth. Still, it’s not the kind of brave truth-telling the Sanders campaign pitch might have led you to expect.

Today, Prof. Krugman says that such a plan is feasible if you are willing to pay a great deal more in taxes
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/paul-krugman-explains-why-single-payer-health-care-entirely-achievable-us-and-how
If we went to government provision of all insurance, we’d pay more in taxes but less in premiums, and the overall burden of health spending would probably fall, because single-payer systems tend to be cheaper than market-based."

The amount of higher taxes are not quantified in this article by Krugman. To pay for any such plan will require massive tax hikes

Again sanders has utterly failed in his attempts to get Vermont to adopt his magical single payer plan because the state of Vermont cannot use hypothetical societal saving to pay for this plan. Even Krugman admits that much higher taxes are needed
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
39. Loss of freedom is a cost.
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 08:49 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

rurallib

(62,346 posts)
2. I will probably get ripped for this, but I see sticking with the ACA as a liability
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:34 PM
Sep 2019

That was a republican plan written by the Heritage Foundation.
I am guessing many of us hoped it would be a place holder until a real universal health care package could be passed.
M4A is the closest I have seen to universal care in this country.

The insurance companies will not give up their incredibly profitable business without fighting with every lie they have, that is for sure.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
40. MfA would be extremely similar to Obamacare after the additional
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 09:01 PM
Sep 2019

coverages always planned were added to it. Frankly, I have real trouble believing Sanders himself doesn't feel real contempt for his plan. It's based on for-profit medicine just like the ACA.

And the insurance companies already see the writing on the wall. That's because "insurance" is for unforeseen emergencies, not for lifetime health maintenance. The ACA did away with underwriting and that is the future for all. The only need they can fulfill is clerical, and computers will be handling more and more of that also. Right now ACA insurers are required to devote 80% of premium dollars to patient care. That percentage will increase under any plan.

I believe it's something like 3% under the VA, but that's socialized medicine, and neither the ACA nor MfA are even slightly socialized.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

JI7

(89,175 posts)
3. it's one of the things that hurt Harris and allowed Biden to own the position
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:35 PM
Sep 2019

of being defender of ACA.


but for Warren that is probably not the same since she is trying to get Sanders people on her side.


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
4. No, she will lose without it.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:37 PM
Sep 2019

She isn't drinking anything, she can read and knows why Medicare for All is best.

The majority of Americans support improved Medicare for all. Learn about legislation in the House (H.R. 1384) and Senate (S. 1129) that would establish this badly needed reform.

https://pnhp.org/

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

themaguffin

(3,805 posts)
5. Yes, I see it as problematic in general compared to a public option for the reasons that
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:37 PM
Sep 2019

Pete stated in the last debate.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
6. MEDICARE FOR ALL from Andrew Yang's website
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:43 PM
Sep 2019

MEDICARE FOR ALL
Access to quality healthcare is one of the most important factors in overall well being, and yet America is one of the few industrialized nations not to provide healthcare for all of its citizens. Instead, we have a private healthcare system that leaves millions uninsured and bankrupts even some of those who do have health insurance. At the same time, our cost of care is higher than in almost any other industrialized country while providing worse outcomes. The Affordable Care Act was a step in the right direction, providing funds to states to innovate while expanding Medicaid substantially. However, it didn’t address the fundamental issues plaguing our healthcare system:

Access to medicine isn’t guaranteed to all citizens
The incentives for healthcare providers don’t align with providing quality, efficient care
This must change.

Through a Medicare for All system, we can ensure that all Americans receive the healthcare they deserve. Not only will this raise the quality of life for all Americans, but, by increasing access to preventive care, it will also bring overall healthcare costs down.

With a shift to a Medicare for All system, costs can also be controlled directly by setting prices provided for medical services. The best approach is highlighted by the top-ranked Cleveland Clinic. There, doctors are paid a flat salary instead of by a price-for-service model. This shift has led to a hospital where costs are visible and under control. Redundant tests are at a minimum, and physician turnover is much lower than at comparable hospitals.

Doctors also report being more involved with their patients. Since they’re salaried, there’s no need to churn through patient after patient. Instead, they can spend the proper amount of time to ensure that each patient receives their undivided attention and empathy.

Outside of a shift to a Medicare for All system, we can look to the Southcentral Foundation for another important shift necessary in the way we treat patients: holistic approaches. At this treatment center for native Alaskans, mental and physical problems are both investigated, and, unsurprisingly, the two are often linked. By referring patients to psychologists during routine physicals, doctors are able to treat, for example, both the symptoms of obesity and the underlying mental health issue that often is related to the issue. The referral also leads people with issues they may otherwise try to bury – sexual abuse, addictions, or domestic violence issues – to bring them up with a doctor so that they can be addressed.

By providing holistic healthcare to all our citizens, we’ll drastically increase the average quality of life, extend life expectancy, and treat issues that often go untreated. We’ll also be able to bring costs under control and outcomes up, as most other industrialized nations have.

Finally, being tied to an employer so that you don’t lose your healthcare prevents economic mobility. It’s important that people feel free to seek out new opportunities, and our current employer-provided healthcare system prevents that.

PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED

Millions of Americans live without healthcare.
Even those with healthcare are often bankrupted by healthcare costs.
Many Americans who have healthcare have policies that don’t afford them the opportunity to receive proper care.
Healthcare costs in this country are relatively high, and outcomes are relatively poor.
Doctors are incentivized to act as factory workers, churning through patients and prescribing redundant tests, rather than doing what they’d prefer—spending extra time with each patient to ensure overall health.
Many health issues fall through the cracks because doctors rely on patients to bring up issues rather than treating each one holistically.
Employees are tied to their employers because they receive the healthcare benefits through them.

Healthcare should be a basic right for all Americans. Right now, if you get sick you have two things to worry about – how to get better and how to pay for it. Too many Americans are making terrible, impossible choices between paying for healthcare and other needs. We need to provide high-quality healthcare to all Americans and a Medicare for All system is the most efficient way to accomplish that. It will be a massive boost to our economy as people will be able to start businesses and change jobs without fear of losing their health insurance.

GOALS
Holistic healthcare for all Americans
Bend the cost curve of healthcare down
Focus on preventive and holistic care
Change the incentive structure for doctors
Allow doctors and hospitals to innovate in treatment

As President, I will…

Work with Congress to create a Medicare for All system to provide healthcare to all Americans.
Shift the way doctors are compensated to promote holistic and empathic care.
Create incentives for and invest in innovative treatment methods and methodologies.

https://www.yang2020.com/policies/medicare-for-all/


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
7. Agree
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:44 PM
Sep 2019

Every time a voter over 65 hears how wonderful Medicare for All is going to be they think to themselves:

"Don't they know it is not a particularly good program? It does not pay a dime for prescriptions and only pays 80% on claims. Also, we paid into it all of our work years and when we reached 65 got an invite to join Medicare and keep paying in for the rest of our lives as they take it every month from our Social Security check. Can't they come up with something better than Medicare - it just ain't all that great?"

Edit: Looks like the number of voters over 65 is a little less than 50 million.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,280 posts)
10. It's certainly better than nothing, but I think there's a widespread belief
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:07 PM
Sep 2019

that it covers everything, and it doesn't. There are copays and exclusions and you do have to keep paying premiums which are deducted from your SS check every month. If you want more complete coverage you have to buy a supplemental policy from a private insurer (and pay premiums for that, too).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
17. I think the bigger problem is that
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 08:06 PM
Sep 2019

voters under 65 think it is free for seniors. They have no idea that we paid into the fund for decades and that we keep on paying for a mediocre plan.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,280 posts)
18. It isn't free of course; I can use it now because I paid for it in advance
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 08:17 PM
Sep 2019

for decades, and I'm still paying premiums now. Where is the money for MfA going to come from to cover the people who haven't been paying in advance for 40+ years?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

sheshe2

(83,341 posts)
8. It is one of the things that I disagree with her.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:47 PM
Sep 2019

Last edited Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Build on ACA and make that single payer.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Funtatlaguy

(10,856 posts)
11. She needs to take a few days off from the campaign trail
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:18 PM
Sep 2019

And huddle with her staff and any economic advisers.
Then come out with a revised health care plan.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. She needs to come out with a web calculator so everyone can determine what MFA
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 06:48 PM
Sep 2019

will cost in taxes or premiums.

Until then, people are going to prefer a Public Option so they can compare the PO cost against current health plans.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

MontanaFarmer

(630 posts)
12. The reality of MFA makes no difference in the short run.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:25 PM
Sep 2019

It's all about the politics, and in my opinion, and that of the OP, it's politically untenable. No chance. Restoring ALL of the affordable care act, with a Medicare buy- in or some other hyper-competitive public option, gets us there in 15 years anyway. I'm with Elizabeth on many things but with Joe Pop and The Mayor on this one.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
13. Wouldn't matter what Elizabeth's policies were
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:30 PM
Sep 2019

there's a greek chorus here that will always tell you that ONLY Biden can beat trump.

M4A is just an excuse for pushing their guy - come hell or high-water.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Bettie

(15,998 posts)
14. There's a problem with that
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:31 PM
Sep 2019

if you start negotiations at "public option for the ACA", we'll walk away with the status quo or losing ground.

If you start at MFA, a public option is MUCH more likely to happen, as a starting point toward universal health care.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

highplainsdem

(48,730 posts)
15. If Warren were to drop MFA at this point, that would be seen as betrayal by many of her
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 07:47 PM
Sep 2019

supporters who want MFA.

And she'd also likely come under attack by the Sanders campaign, who'd question her commitment to other progressive goals.

I agree with what Michael Tomasky wrote recently about her campaign probably looking for some way for her to "inch away" from MFA.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287285882

It's extremely odd for a candidate who always has "a plan for that" to not have her own very detailed health care plan out yet, with a detailed explanation of how to pay for it.

I don't believe she and her staff haven't done a lot of research on this.

My best guess is they know the details don't look very good.

And unlike Bernie Sanders, Warren isn't willing to admit MFA will mean raising taxes on the midddle class as well as the rich.

So she talks about agreeing with the Sanders plan.

But she dodges the question, every time she's asked, about whether taxes on the middle class will go up to pay for MFA.

This has been getting harder for her to do, and I don't expect the questions to let up.

I suppose her campaign might be considering announcing a "Eureka" moment in the future where she suddenly discovers that MFA will raise taxes too much, and so she's now considering a public option instead. (I don't know what other excuse she could use. Saying she's switching out of political expediency might bother even people like Frank Bruni who applaud her for her slipperiness when she dodges the tax question.)

But that change in position would still alienate a lot of progressives.

And people who aren't already her fans might be more than a little skeptical about the conversion and suspect that she'd known all along that there were problems with MFA, but didn't see any way of picking up more support from progressives than Sanders has without saying she's for it.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Tennessee Tuxedo

(36 posts)
16. I am union
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 08:04 PM
Sep 2019

Have awesome insurance, very little cost to me and do not want to give that up. My wife had severe cancer and had no problems with treatment, anything she needed it was approved and did not paying much out of pocket, saved her life.

I am sorry but MfA is the last thing I want because it would be a massive step down from what I have. Most other union members I know feel the same way. MfA is going to be a huge looser in the general.

Somebody needs to come up with a plan that gets people insurance that need it but not at the cost of the rest of us to make it work.

Does anyone understand my point?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
21. I understand where you are coming from. And you are right to have that position.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 10:48 PM
Sep 2019

Where I think democrats will end up is having people like you keep your current plan if you like it (which you do), but provide an option for working people that are not as lucky as you or former workers who were struck by ageism on the job and are in the hard to find another good job 50-65 age range.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

athena

(4,187 posts)
37. You would still be better off with Medicare for All.
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 12:09 PM
Sep 2019

I understand what you're saying, but I believe you're mistaken about what Medicare for All would really mean. You're assuming that the health care you receive would be inferior under Medicare for All. You're assuming that it would somehow be like having inferior health insurance. But those are false assumptions.

Under Medicare for All, there would be no paperwork. Nothing would have to be approved. Your doctor would tell you what is needed; you would have it done; and you wouldn't have to pay anything. That's how it works in Canada. People have operations all the time without paying anything or having to file any paperwork. And, when your procedure is urgent, you go to the head of the line. People get cancer all the time in Canada, and they are treated for it.

Please see:
https://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20180601/cancer-care-twice-as-costly-in-us-versus-canada#1

A month's worth of chemotherapy cost $12,345 on the U.S. side of the border versus $6,195 just over the line into Canada, according to findings scheduled to be presented Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in Chicago.

What's more, the extra money Americans paid didn't buy them any more time on Earth. Average survival was roughly similar on either side of the border.

"You don't necessarily see that patients in Canada are faring much worse, or worse at all, which is sometimes the impression that we have in this country -- that our outcomes are far better than in places with single-payer health care," said principal investigator Dr. Veena Shankaran.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
20. I like Medicare for All that Want It as being an ACA public option.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 10:44 PM
Sep 2019

That is workable and builds on two structures that are in place now. It also won't require a long overhaul and costly political fight.

I think the key things is covering two groups with affordable, low deductible, no cap health insurance, the unemployed and middleclass workers that currently can't afford quality health insurance.

I believe the ACA or MFATWI should also allow small companies to buy into a cumulative group insurance pool (dramatically lowers their costs and allows them to provide high quality plans to their employees).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

elocs

(22,474 posts)
24. Medicare for All has a near 0 chance of ever becoming law anytime soon,
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 06:41 PM
Sep 2019

but it makes for a great pie-in-the-sky promise to fix the healthcare problem.
And why call it "Medicare" for All when it is not the Medicare that millions of people already know about?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
25. Medicare for all is bold and good for the movement.
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 07:11 PM
Sep 2019

Now is not the time to retreat.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
26. So all of the seniors that like Medicare are deluded?
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 07:57 PM
Sep 2019

Rather than start with a weak position, demand the public option. Let the insurance companies compete if they can, but lower premiums and more coverage for the public option is something that private insurance cannot compete against.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Florida Bull

(103 posts)
28. If
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 10:15 PM
Sep 2019

If Elizabeth Warren switched to opposing Medicare for All, I would lose my trust in her. It would look two-faced, and I would feel betrayed.

There are other factors, but I think the appearance of being indecisive on Medicare for All hurt Kamala Harris’s poll numbers.

It would be one thing to admit you think you will have to compromise on healthcare in the 2020’s, while still endorsing Medicare for All in the longer-term future. This would apply to Kirsten Gillibrand.

But, I think it is now probably too late for a candidate to flip-flop on healthcare policy and denounce one’s position from the first few debates. The candidate would appear unsure and become vulnerable to criticism from both the more Centrist and more Liberal candidates. It would also alienate supporters. Imagine Ted Cruz suddenly switching to supporting Obergefell v. Hodges or an assault weapons ban in the 2016 Republican Primary.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
29. I feel like there's a lot of fear/angst by people that think they somehow won't have their same doc-
Sat Sep 21, 2019, 02:39 AM
Sep 2019

tor or will somehow have a worse experience if they have an issue. They can't imagine something better because it's very complicated and even theoretical to most of us. If we can demonstrate that things are going to be BETTER, we might be able to bring people on board.

I'm not sure how she drops such a major thing without looking waffley, but if it can't be made popular, she might have to.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Gothmog

(143,999 posts)
30. NBC/WSJ poll shows Biden's healthcare stance (optional Medicare buy-in) much more popular
Sun Sep 22, 2019, 09:21 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

BlueWI

(1,736 posts)
31. There are honest differences on this issue.
Mon Sep 23, 2019, 11:48 PM
Sep 2019

Agree or disagree, Warren's stance is clear. It's refreshing to move away from focus-grouping every stance in your platform. Triangulation costs Democrats election wins in the new political notmal. Warren's straightforward style is why she's appealing in this climate.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

athena

(4,187 posts)
36. Exactly. The truth is that America desperately needs Medicare for All.
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 12:01 PM
Sep 2019

And giving up on it because it appears politically difficult is a losing strategy. Americans respect someone who has strong opinions, articulates them, and sticks to them. I believe Elizabeth Warren will win because she speaks the truth about health care.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

BlueWI

(1,736 posts)
38. With you on this.
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 08:45 PM
Sep 2019

Private health insurance is an increasingly rare commodity. It's time to meet this vast need head on.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(93,862 posts)
32. "Run away" might be a stretch, but it help convince a lot of people...myself included
Mon Sep 23, 2019, 11:49 PM
Sep 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Response to DIVINEprividence (Original post)

 

Gothmog

(143,999 posts)
43. Obamacare Has Made People Healthier
Wed Oct 2, 2019, 01:09 AM
Oct 2019

Getting rid of Obamacare is a bad move https://politicalwire.com/2019/09/30/obamacare-has-made-people-healthier/

Washington Post: “Poor people in Michigan with asthma and diabetes were admitted to the hospital less often after they joined Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. More than 25,000 Ohio smokers got help through the state’s Medicaid expansion that led them to quit. And around the country, patients with advanced kidney disease who went on dialysis were more likely to be alive a year later if they lived in a Medicaid-expansion state.”

“Such findings are part of an emerging mosaic of evidence that, nearly a decade after it became one of the most polarizing health-care laws in U.S. history, the ACA is making some Americans healthier — and less likely to die.”
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»If Warren were to drop Me...