Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumHow Bernie Sanders threatens to derail Hillary’s coronation
Trying to create a presidential persona and a rationale for running, Hillary Clinton relaunched her campaign at a memorial to FDR. She used the glorious setting of Four Freedoms Park to summon Roosevelts legacy and frame her theme as Four Fights.
She also invoked her husband and President Obama, as if piggy-backing on presidents would define her. Perhaps it will work, but her predicament recalls a Dem president she didnt mention: Lyndon Baines Johnson. The similarities must scare her.
LBJ looked certain to be re-elected in 1968, until a Minnesota senator with a penchant for poetry named Eugene McCarthy shocked the world by getting 42 percent in the New Hampshire primary, against Johnsons 49 percent. Less than three weeks later, the president famously declared that I shall not seek, and I will not accept, the nomination of my party for another term as your president.
If there is a McCarthy-like figure on the scene today, it is Bernie Sanders, the scrappy underdog threatening to upset Hillarys coronation.
The news that Sanders is surging in polls in Iowa and New Hampshire must be sending shivers through Clintons camp. Even though Hillary still leads in the 2016 first states, the gap has narrowed so much that her surrogates are lowering expectations, saying Sanders might win some showdowns.
Thats amazing enough, but her problem could be even more serious. Echoing the Mark Twain line that history doesnt repeat itself, but it does rhyme, the Clinton-Sanders dynamic is starting to rumble like the political earthquake of 68.
LBJs demise is a textbook example of how quickly the bubble can burst. He had the power of incumbency while Hillary wears the mantle of inevitability. That didnt work for her in 2008, either, when Obama emerged to crash her party.
Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, doesnt need to win the nomination and he probably wont to block Clinton. He only need show that shes not inevitable, and that there is a motivated, significant piece of the party that rejects her.
That is exactly what hes doing, as large, enthusiastic crowds greet him wherever he goes. If she looks beatable, more viable candidates will find the courage to run.
Thats the McCarthy model. He ran as a dissident against the Vietnam War and the New Hampshire results in mid-March of 68 crystallized unhappiness with Johnson.
Nearly 20,000 American soldiers were dead by the end of 1967, and the election year would be the bloodiest of all. It started with a Jan.?1 attack on a US military base and Februarys Tet Offensive saw the deadliest single week of the war, when 543 Americans were killed and more than 2,500 wounded. Overall, 16,899 of our soldiers died in 1968, the most in any year.
In those dark days, many people, including top Democrats, grew disillusioned with Johnson, and McCarthys promise to end the conflict found special resonance among draft-age students. Shaggy anti-war protesters shaved and got haircuts in a clean for Gene movement.
But the New Hampshire primary was McCarthys high-water mark. Bobby Kennedy jumped in and, after Johnson bowed out, so did Hubert Humphrey. Kennedy probably would have won, but was assassinated in June by Palestinian terrorist Sirhan Sirhan. Humphrey got the nod at the Chicago convention, a debacle marked by violent street protests that helped Republican Richard Nixon win the presidency.
The anti-Hillary movement is also picking up steam because of her shady dealings with international oligarchs and the rivers of cash flowing to the Clinton Foundation. Never reliably honest, shes been caught in lies about her e-mails as secretary of state, leading most voters to say she is untrustworthy. That, in turn, is keeping several GOP candidates ahead or close in hypothetical matchups.
Although she remains the likely nominee, there are many dents in Clintons armor and a long way to go. By the end, 2016 could be the new 1968.
http://nypost.com/2015/07/05/how-bernie-sanders-threatens-to-derail-hillarys-coronation/
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Just seeing his name printed in the nypost makes me annoyed. Like nobody suspects that paper would back anyone who has a shot at slowing HRC down. I remember when it used to be a newspaper.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)And I see this as a convoluted way of saying the Dems will figure out a way to put forward a too-week-to-win candidate.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,783 posts)Thank you for sharing this careful analysis.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)There is a lot of strange stuff in this article. ANY Democrat can beat ANY Republican (short of vote theft or an October surprise) because of electoral math. Once people realize this, a lot of people will vote for the candidate who represents them rather than the candidate they think can win.