HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Groups » Bernie Sanders (Group) » Are Hillary Clinton suppo...

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:33 PM

Are Hillary Clinton supporters really calling the actual photographer

who took all of those photos of Bernie a liar? They are interviewing Mrs. Greenspan, but not the actual photographer who says is it indeed Bernie Sanders in this photo. Same clothes, same haircut. Goodness. Do they have any idea it makes them look like monkeys in a cage flinging crap?

37 replies, 2142 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 37 replies Author Time Post
Reply Are Hillary Clinton supporters really calling the actual photographer (Original post)
onecaliberal Feb 2016 OP
Kalidurga Feb 2016 #1
dchill Feb 2016 #2
restorefreedom Feb 2016 #30
valerief Feb 2016 #3
dorkzilla Feb 2016 #4
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #5
rhett o rick Feb 2016 #15
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #17
noiretextatique Feb 2016 #6
Jackilope Feb 2016 #7
OrwellwasRight Feb 2016 #35
Hydra Feb 2016 #37
seaotter Feb 2016 #8
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #10
tk2kewl Feb 2016 #9
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #12
Doctor_J Feb 2016 #11
AzDar Feb 2016 #13
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #14
mhatrw Feb 2016 #16
AzDar Feb 2016 #18
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #19
AzDar Feb 2016 #21
mhatrw Feb 2016 #24
AzDar Feb 2016 #25
MisterP Feb 2016 #33
LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #28
Divernan Feb 2016 #36
rhett o rick Feb 2016 #20
Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #22
LostOne4Ever Feb 2016 #23
orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #26
NowSam Feb 2016 #27
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #29
NowSam Feb 2016 #34
restorefreedom Feb 2016 #31
onecaliberal Feb 2016 #32

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:34 PM

1. Some are

Most have conceded the point that it is indeed Bernie in the disputed pictures.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:34 PM

2. they are simply refurbishing the truth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dchill (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:49 PM

30. snort...repurposing the facts......nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:35 PM

3. WWRD? What Would Rove Do? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:42 PM

4. When ya got nuthin’ else, ya fling poo

It’s a sign of stupidity to come.

You know you’ve hit rock bottom when Reince Penis is saying “at least we’re not as bad as the Democrats” (not that anything he says is true, but still...)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:44 PM

5. Even after the photographer came out they are still insisting. Clearly delusional people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Reply #5)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:03 PM

15. Take away their delusions and they've got nothing. nm

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rhett o rick (Reply #15)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:04 PM

17. Truer words.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:46 PM

6. i find this latest tactic disgusting

as any black person with an iota of integrity should.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:47 PM

7. this is HRC mode. Do the damage, then "My bad."

Iraq? Then -- Let's go to war. Now? "I was wrong."
Keystone XL? Only until late did she finally take a stand against it.
TPP? "Gold standard, baby!" Now? "Bernie is against it and voting public agree with him. I guess it isn't gold standard enough for me .... for now."
Marriage? Then -- "I believe in traditional marriage is a man and a woman." Now? "I believe in gay rights and gay marriage. Yay!"

Seriously, I don't want 4 years of GOP damage, but Hillary is going to do enough incremental damage as well. She is not the best we can get or do. Her judgement is just awful, but rest assured, she will apologize to us in the future for whatever damage she delivers if elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #7)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 08:40 PM

35. I'd rather vote for what I want and not get it, than vote for what I don't want

and get it. -- Eugene V. Debs

Voting for what you don't want ensures unhappiness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackilope (Reply #7)

Sat Feb 13, 2016, 03:02 PM

37. Her judgement is fine for what she wants out of it

She just doesn't like it that there are people who are willing to question her about it. Questioning the Queen indeed. Hmph.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:48 PM

8. Nothing but:

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to seaotter (Reply #8)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:49 PM

10. lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:49 PM

9. He photoshopped them

 

But really, in all honesty, they are still pushing it for the same reason they push all of their bullshit. Rile up Bernie supporters, get some to lose their cool, then call all of his supporters racists, sexists, haters, whatever. Distract from her empty policies and Bernie's popular ones and make it about who called who a poopyhead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tk2kewl (Reply #9)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:01 PM

12. They've started a controversy and some will believe it.

The sad fucking thing is Clinton is NOT there because she was campaigning for REPUBLICANS because she was one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:55 PM

11. not much better than freepers

 

Which is why I won't be voting for Clinton

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:02 PM

13. There are none blinder (or more ridiculous) than those who pretend not to see...

 

As for the Media: wonder what the going rate for dirty-water-carrying is these days?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AzDar (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:03 PM

14. I don't know, but it is truly astonishing to me. Never thought I'd see the day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:04 PM

16. The depths of this little episode of ratfuckery are truly unfathomable.

Sally Cook, the retired government lawyer University of Chicago alumni who contacted the University of Chicago archives to get the caption of the photo changed, conceded to Time magazine reporter Sam Frizell that she could not "say for certain the man is not Sanders."

So what made it so important to her that she felt she needed to change the caption in order to identify the individual at a 40+-year-old sit in as some long dead acquaintance rather than as Bernie Sanders?

Who then told Sam Frizell, Time magazine's Clinton pool reporter, about this trifling photo flap? What induced Sam Frizell to devote 1000 words to this complete non-story without making any attempt to contact the original photographer?

What then induced the WaPo's Jonathan Capehart, the live in partner of a rich Clinton campaign staffer, to pick up this complete non-story and spin it into a direct attack of Sanders' integrity without making any attempt to contact the original photographer?

Why did corporate cable news then trot out Capehart on 10 different shows to promulgate this complete non-story?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:05 PM

18. ...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:06 PM

19. Agree. Sad sorry fucking state of affairs. Who is going to be left to support that woman?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:08 PM

21. OMG...I did not know about Capehart's personal connection...his husband is a Clinton staffer??

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AzDar (Reply #21)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:18 PM

24. Yes, indeed. Have a look at their awesome establishment home.

http://capitolfile-magazine.com/inside-jonathan-capehart-and-nick-schmits-house

Here is his new job after working on Clinton's 2008 campaign and for her when she was the SoS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #24)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:07 PM

25. Thank you. Wow.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #24)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 08:13 PM

33. looks like the sort of place the interior-design geeks on Curbed would rip apart

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:24 PM

28. Will Capehart?

Be Fired As a Result? What About Mitchell-Greenspan That Allowed For This Unverified Rumor Mill Bullshit To Be Propped Up As "News" on Her Show?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mhatrw (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 09:18 PM

36. Sally Cook/Linked In/Martindale Info

It'a a common name, but my google search only turned up one attorney by that name who was a University of Chicago alumna, Class of 1966. She's lived and worked in Indianapolis for 43 years. I hope there is at least one uncompromised journalist out there who will contact her and interview her in depth as to who and what motivated her in this deception.

Education
University of Michigan Law School
University of Michigan Law School
Juris Doctor (J.D.)
1972
The University of Chicago
The University of Chicago
Bachelor's Degree, Psychology
1961 – 1966
Experience
retired
n/a
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sally-cook-5132b5a0?authType=name&authToken=jPpx



http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/46201-in-sally-cook-4394074.html
Sally Ann Cook
Indianapolis, IN
Licensed for 43 years
961 Woodruff Place East Dr
Indianapolis, IN, 46201-1925

Office (317) 423-9727(fax number)

Admitted to practice in State / Court
Date
Indiana 1972
https://www.lawyer.com/sally-ann-cook.html



Sally A. Cook - Lawyer Profile
Educ. Consultant; State Dept. of Educ.

961 Woodruff Pl. E. Dr.
Indianapolis, Indiana
(Marion Co.)

Experience & Credentials Client/Peer Review Ratings™

Practice Areas Special Education

University University of Chicago, B.A.
Law School University of Michigan, J.D.
Admitted 1972

ISLN 908217593

http://www.martindale.com/Sally-A-Cook/980758-lawyer.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:07 PM

20. This is bullying 101. Best to just look them in the eye and smile. Always take the high road

 

when dealing with bullies. They hate it if they can't drag you down to their level. The Big Money that wants HRC in the WH will do anything possible. They are not used to losing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:17 PM

22. Of course they are.

 

If they had to actually admit that Bernie has a strong civil rights record, then they might actually have to admit that all those people who they said were "condescending" to them might actually have been pointing out real gaps in their knowledge. That is unacceptable, obviously. Reality must, therefore, be the one to bend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:18 PM

23. Bernie and his supporters denounced the Email fake scandal against Clinton

[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]But apparently, A great number of Hillary's supporters on this site are pushing this SLANDER against Sanders.

It was Sanders in those photos, and they ALL KNOW IT.

Between this and their revisionist history of Sander's LGBTQ+ record, it is clear to me that some of them have no shame. How can they even sleep at night?[/font]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:10 PM

26. Perception Management , wagging the dog , using those Millions .

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:14 PM

27. Bernie's Strength is Trustworthiness which is Hillary's Gigantic Weakness

Wasn't it Karl Rove that perfected the art of hanging your own weakness on your opponent?

Put another way, isn't it a pretty well known political tactic to attempt to destroy your opponent's credibility when you yourself have none? Then, you can say, "See, neither of us are trustworthy so go with me cause I'm the devil you know."

Her overuse last night of the term, "Level with the American People" was nasty and ugly. Bernie has been on the level from Day 1 while she makes Nixon look like a saint. Oh, yeah: This is just my opinion and that is how it seems to me. My perception. Your perception may differ.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NowSam (Reply #27)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:37 PM

29. This takes the entire cake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Reply #29)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 08:26 PM

34. Thank you! Let's all share a slice.

Because sharing is caring.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:51 PM

31. i think i can help,

yes, yes they are calling him a liar

but of course, they are the ones wearing these



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #31)

Fri Feb 12, 2016, 07:57 PM

32. Indeed they are...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread