2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAn American Ambassador died on Hillary Clinton's watch. He was HER employee; MURDERED.
I don't hear much about Christopher Stevens. An American Ambassador is the face we as a country present to the world.
Time was, Ambassadors were serious business. Ambassadors. Liasons between US, and the fucking WORLD. They were not chosen by fiat, they were chosen because they had GRAVITAS. They were the kind of people who could, (without meaning any offense here) "sell snowballs to Eskimoes". They understood protocol. They were able to sit with People of Power in other countries and soothe their ruffled nerves.
Today they're campaign contributors. Caroline Kennedy couldn't speak a WORD of Japanese when appointed, nor had ever had the inclination to learn. Today an Ambassadorship is a gift.
Christopher Stevens didn't FIT that mold. He was truly enthralled with the people of Libya and people of the Middle East at large. He spent most of his adult life trying to make their lives better.
In the days before he died, he sent URGENT messages to the Department of State entailing the breakdown of security in Libya. He literally begged for an increase in security. Someone denied those requests, and in the end, Christopher Stevens and four brave men who endeavored to keep him safe died.
Hillary Clinton claims not to have seen his URGENT messages. Contemplate this: The Secretary of State, the person Christopher Stevens was DIRECTLY accountable to, claims NOT TO HAVE SEEN his requests, and because of that, he was brutally murdered along with four others.
We don't hear much about Christopher Stevens today. The MURDER of a US Ambassador somehow doesn't merit discussion.
It happened on Hillary Clinton's watch. It happened because she "didn't see" his URGENT requests for extra security in a deteriorating place.
Forget the bullshit about the "video" and the fact that when Ambassador Stevens was murdered only a few thousand people THE WORLD OVER had seen it. THAT'S not important.
What IS important (at least to me) is HOW an AMBASSADOR could reach out to the SECRETARY OF STATE in an URGENT manner before he was murdered, and NOT have his cables reach the Secretary of State's EYES.
If those cables DID reach Secretary Clinton's eyes; she's LYING. If those cables DIDN'T reach her eyes... there was a systemic flaw in the way her Department of State was run and as we all know: SHIT RUNS UPHILL, all the way to the top.
This bullshit spewed by Hillary's supporters... this "BENGHAZI! BENGHAZI! EMAIL EMAIL" bullshit is insulting to the very core of my being. Sometimes I feel like screaming back "CHRISTOPHER STEVENS! MURDERED!" in response.
An American Ambassador was murdered. He reached out to the Secretary of State in an URGENT manner requesting extra security. The Secretary of State says she never saw his cables and within hours of his death blamed it on some dickhead in Cerritos, California and the Department of Homeland Security sent more people to his house than the WHOLE FUCKING AMERICAN GOVERNMENT sent to save an Ambassador.
She wants to be President? Not really. She wants to be the FIRST FEMALE President.
I could NEVER support her... thank goodness I don't have to. I live in California.
jfern
(5,204 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)mylye2222
(2,992 posts)is a matter of integrity.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I think plenty of foreign service people have died under previous SS and presidents' watches.
Under Bush
January 22, 2002. Calcutta, India. Gunmen associated with Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami attack the U.S. Consulate. Five people are killed.
June 14, 2002. Karachi, Pakistan. Suicide bomber connected with al-Qaida attacks the U.S. Consulate, killing 12 and injuring 51.
October 12, 2002. Denpasar, Indonesia. U.S. diplomatic offices bombed as part of a string of Bali Bombings. No fatalities.
February 28, 2003. Islamabad, Pakistan. Several gunmen fire upon the U.S. Embassy. Two people are killed.
May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al-Qaida terrorists storm the diplomatic compound killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.
July 30, 2004. Tashkent, Uzbekistan. A suicide bomber from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan attacks the U.S. Embassy, killing two people.
December 6, 2004. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Al-Qaida terrorists storm the U.S. Consulate and occupy the perimeter wall. Nine people are killed.
March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name David Foy. This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on whats considered American soil.)
September 12, 2006. Damascus, Syria. Four armed gunmen shouting Allahu akbar storm the U.S. Embassy using grenades, automatic weapons, a car bomb and a truck bomb. Four people are killed, 13 are wounded.
January 12, 2007. Athens, Greece. Members of a Greek terrorist group called the Revolutionary Struggle fire a rocket-propelled grenade at the U.S. Embassy. No fatalities.
March 18, 2008. Sanaa, Yemen. Members of the al-Qaida-linked Islamic Jihad of Yemen fire a mortar at the U.S. Embassy. The shot misses the embassy, but hits nearby school killing two.
July 9, 2008. Istanbul, Turkey. Four armed terrorists attack the U.S. Consulate. Six people are killed.
September 17, 2008. Sanaa, Yemen. Terrorists dressed as military officials attack the U.S. Embassy with an arsenal of weapons including RPGs and detonate two car bombs. Sixteen people are killed, including an American student and her husband (they had been married for three weeks when the attack occurred). This is the second attack on this embassy in seven months
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)man is dead. he was a good man from all accounts.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)right before the 2012 election.
And they've kept it going ever since in order to try and discredit Hillary.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)of the Petraeus CIA and Clinton State Dept in Libya and Syria. The GOP actually like the outcome of serial regime change, sectarian warfare, and mass destruction across the Mideast but want to exploit its failures for their own fun and profit.
This OP feeds right into the RW narrative of distraction.
FarPoint
(12,366 posts)Viciously attacking Hillary with Right Wing rhetoric will destroy everything Democrats strive for in America...that encompasses Bernie Sanders campaign.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Don't make me laugh....
Response to truebrit71 (Reply #290)
Name removed Message auto-removed
FarPoint
(12,366 posts)I vote Blue...I don't use right wing or Fox noise tactics against any Democratic candidate.... I just won't.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Iraq war, Syria war, fracking, Honduras coup, bankruptcy bill, repeal of Glass Steagall, not supporting SSM until 2013, and so on. Not this shit.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Hekate
(90,683 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)They've taken over radio, television and other venues until it's an echo chamber with no oppostition. It's like 'surround sound' as it was once called.
Repetition really does work.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)And it's getting harder and harder to tell them apart.
Sid
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That was fully supported by the kkk, and few others, I would hope I would have the common sense to re-think my position.
Just saying ...
George II
(67,782 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)And get myself to the nearest mental health facility.
I mean, really ... how the hell so many "DU:progressives" can, literally and knowingly, quote limbaugh, beck and trey, and NOT ask themselves, WTF am I thinking/saying ... is way beyond me.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 30, 2015, 01:40 PM - Edit history (4)
It was his decision to stay on in Benghazi despite warnings he and other US diplomats and CIA officers received that Islamist militia groups he was dealing with in Eastern Libya had growing hostility to aspects of US involvement in the region. Ultimately, it was his choice to remain based on his and others misunderstanding of the Libyan opposition and other US "allies". See, A Deadly Mix in Benghazi by David D. Kirkpatrick December 28, 2013, http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/#/?chapt=0
More broadly, Mr. Stevens, like his bosses in Washington, believed that the United States could turn a critical mass of the fighters it helped oust Colonel Qaddafi into reliable friends. He died trying.
Let's not forget why Stevens was still in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012 - for 18 months he had been the lead of a US gov't interagency team that was coordinating the armed overthrow of Ghadaffi, and after the regime's complete destruction, a coordinated transfer with Qatar and the UAE of arms and fighters from Libya to Syria. See, U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis Hands, By JAMES RISEN, MARK MAZZETTI and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDTDEC. 5, 2012, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?_r=0
WASHINGTON The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.
. . .
The Obama administration did not initially raise objections when Qatar began shipping arms to opposition groups in Syria, even if it did not offer encouragement, according to current and former administration officials. But they said the United States has growing concerns that, just as in Libya, the Qataris are equipping some of the wrong militants.
The United States, which had only small numbers of C.I.A. officers in Libya during the tumult of the rebellion, provided little oversight of the arms shipments. Within weeks of endorsing Qatars plan to send weapons there in spring 2011, the White House began receiving reports that they were going to Islamic militant groups. They were more antidemocratic, more hard-line, closer to an extreme version of Islam than the main rebel alliance in Libya, said a former Defense Department official. The Qatari assistance to fighters viewed as hostile by the United States demonstrates the Obama administrations continuing struggles in dealing with the Arab Spring uprisings, as it tries to support popular protest movements while avoiding American military entanglements. Relying on surrogates allows the United States to keep its fingerprints off operations, but also means they may play out in ways that conflict with American interests.
. . .
He said that Qatar would not have gone through with the arms shipments if the United States had resisted them, but other current and former administration officials said Washington had little leverage at times over Qatari officials. They march to their own drummer, said a former senior State Department official. The White House and State Department declined to comment.
. . .
But after the White House decided to encourage Qatar and on a smaller scale, the United Arab Emirates to ship arms to the Libyans, President Obama complained in April 2011 to the emir of Qatar that his country was not coordinating its actions in Libya with the United States, the American officials said. The president made the point to the emir that we needed transparency about what Qatar was doing in Libya, said a former senior administration official who had been briefed on the matter.
About that same time, Mahmoud Jibril, then the prime minister of the Libyan transitional government, expressed frustration to administration officials that the United States was allowing Qatar to arm extremist groups opposed to the new leadership, according to several American officials. They, like nearly a dozen current and former White House, diplomatic, intelligence, military and foreign officials, would speak only on the condition of anonymity for this article. The administration has never determined where all of the weapons, paid for by Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, went inside Libya, officials said. Qatar is believed to have shipped by air and sea small arms, including machine guns, automatic rifles, and ammunition, for which it has demanded reimbursement from Libyas new government. Some of the arms since have been moved from Libya to militants with ties to Al Qaeda in Mali, where radical jihadi factions have imposed Shariah law in the northern part of the country, the former Defense Department official said. Others have gone to Syria, according to several American and foreign officials and arms traders.
Although NATO provided air support that proved critical for the Libyan rebels, the Obama administration wanted to avoid getting immersed in a ground war, which officials feared could lead the United States into another quagmire in the Middle East.
Within months after the attack in Benghazi, the flow of arms and fighters from Libya to Syria escalated, along with the direct role of Gulf states, particularly Qatar, in large-scale transfers as the US moved toward open arming of the Syrian opposition: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/22/world/africa/in-a-turnabout-syria-rebels-get-libyan-weapons.html
. . .
As the United States and its Western allies move toward providing lethal aid to Syrian rebels, these secretive transfers give insight into an unregistered arms pipeline that is difficult to monitor or control. And while the system appears to succeed in moving arms across multiple borders and to select rebel groups, once inside Syria the flow branches out. Extremist fighters, some of them aligned with Al Qaeda, have the money to buy the newly arrived stock, and many rebels are willing to sell.
. . .
Those weapons, which slipped from state custody as Colonel Qaddafis people rose against him in 2011, are sent on ships or Qatar Emiri Air Force flights to a network of intelligence agencies and Syrian opposition leaders in Turkey. From there, Syrians distribute the arms according to their own formulas and preferences to particular fighting groups, which in turn issue them to their fighters on the ground, rebels and activists said.
Qatari C-17 cargo aircraft have made at least three stops in Libya this year including flights from Mitiga airport in Tripoli on Jan. 15 and Feb. 1, and another that departed Benghazi on April 16, according to flight data provided by an aviation official in the region. The planes returned to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The cargo was then flown to Ankara, Turkey, along with other weapons and equipment that the Qataris had been gathering for the rebels, officials and rebels said.
In the end, it was the failure of a US covert activity, which was most enthusiastically promoted and co-managed by David Petraeus' CIA with Hillary Clinton's State Department, that sealed Ambassador Steven's fate. That is a fact that neither the Administration nor Republicans in Congress who essentially agreed with the program of serial regime change want the American public to clearly understand.
okasha
(11,573 posts)He's showing off his moves in the OP.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Perhaps the OP can forward his resume?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)But was it really Clinton's fault, or can that be traced back to Republican budget cuts? I say the latter, because think about what we hear on the fires in the northwest - the GOP penchant to cut, cut, cut has hurt our ability to deal with these fires. And think of the recent ebola scare (remember Lindsey Graham, "We're ALL gonna dayah"?); it was GOP cut, cut, cutting that caused us not to be able to confine that to Africa in the first place.
You can't lower taxes and run the programs Americans need.
I'm not supporting Clinton for president, but this is really not why.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)That would have had to happen because of a systemic problem within the State Department making it possible for URGENT cables from an Ambassador to go unseen by the Secretary of State. On the other hand, if Hillary Clinton DID see his cables and disregarded them... Christopher Stevens' blood is on her hands.
Either way... it points to a deficiency in the way the State Department was run under her watch.
My opinion is if there are systemic problems at the State Department under your watch... you don't deserve to be promoted.
No more Peter Principle of promotion ESPECIALLY when it comes to the Executive.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)I did develop serious doubts about Clinton's leadership in her primary battle with Obama. Her campaign pretty much imploded with people sniping at each other, and that isn't very encouraging when you think she wants to be Pres.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)And it happened on her watch. I believe it deserves consideration in this primary election.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It is worthy of consideration in this election. Nobody deserves a pass; lives were lost. This isn't the Special Olympics.
Separation
(1,975 posts)Maybe she never got the email? I mean she was AOL as her personal email server!!
George II
(67,782 posts)...you threw out nor an accurate timeline of the events surrounding that horrible incident.
No, you're so obsessed with viciously attacking Hillary Clinton that you've allowed it to get in the way of the facts (IF you even cared about the facts)
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Forward your application to Fox News.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)FarPoint
(12,366 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)FarPoint
(12,366 posts)Long past due for me.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But i tried ignore dozens of times but i get bored of it.
FarPoint
(12,366 posts)Makes it difficult to hang out here longer than 15 minutes.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Somehow it will be his fault, and it'll be Bernghazi!
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)oasis
(49,383 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)SOMEONE decides it's not important enough to show her.
The Ambassador is murdered, along with his security team.
Answer me this: Is an URGENT message about security from an American Ambassador something that need not pass under the Secretary of State's nose?
Yes. Or. No.
If it DID, and she did nothing about it and he was MURDERED, does she bear any blame? Yes. No.
If it DIDN'T... does that say anything about how the Department of State operated when she sat at its helm?
Yes. Or. No.
oasis
(49,383 posts)Pointing fingers at Hillary or Obama does very little good this far down the road. As passionate as you seem to be about the incident, perhaps you should have weighed in on this during the time it happened.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)oasis
(49,383 posts)I gotta say, with all due respect, you must have a longstanding grudge against Hillary.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)He spent the better part of his adult life trying to make their lives better, and his thanks was murder and desecration.
My post was hidden for speaking out in anger against his murderers.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Not buying your story.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think you will say anything because you hate Hillary.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)An. American. Ambassador.
Diplomacy. I'm guessing it's not your strong suit.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Not diplomatic to Democrats who spew rw bullshit.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Are you fucking SERIOUS?
A person whose ONLY responsibility was to represent the United States to his assigned foreign country was MURDERED.
He worked for the Secretary of State. Answered to NO ONE but the Secretary of State. He was MURDERED. His murder could have possibly been prevented... but it wasn't because his URGENT cables didn't reach his BOSS. His BOSS saw to it that more people went to the home of some DUFUS in Cerritos, California than went to her employee's aid before the murder. Those are FACTS.
No problem there... just right wing talking points.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Will you support HRC if she wins the nomination?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Not because I think she's the BEST Democrat though... I don't and you poking me with a stick and telling me I'm not on the right side won't be the reason I'll vote the same ticket I always have.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)Be angry at the fucksticks who refused to commit more funding for embassy security.
Be angry at the assholes on the right, like Mitt Romney, who used his death to make political hay before his body had cooled.
Why you feel the need to piss all over Hillary Clinton for Benghazi is beyond me.
brush
(53,778 posts)it had a lot to do with what happened in several countries in the region and it spilled over to Benghazi.
The guy who made it had just gotten out of prison but somehow was able to gather a movie crew, equipment, actors, locations and a script. He got the film made and distributed in the Middle East all this was done by a guy just out of prison.
Who funded this? Where the hell did this convict get the money and liaisons to get all that done? And once it was done why was he railroaded right back to prison.
Yeah, he was used and sent back to prison. Some powerful forces made all that happen.
Perhaps you should direct some of your blame on Pamela Gellar and her Muslim hating organization.
oasis
(49,383 posts)DU had to be terribly strict in those days. I wasn't posting during that period, but I would guess most DUers expressed themselves in similar fashion on the subject. I'll bet the juries had to put in for overtime.
Anyway, we agree that the Bengazi attack was a horrible event and the innocent lives lost there deserve to be honored and remembered.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)George II
(67,782 posts).........(and using hard right-wing talking points and "facts" to viciously attack Hillary Clinton.
Even those closest to the REAL facts have absolved Clinton of any culpability.
I wouldn't be surprised if your next rant is about the USS Cole, Khobar Towers, etc.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....Free Republic material, not DEMOCRATIC material.
PS - posting stuff like this will NOT get Bernie Sanders the nomination!
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)My experience in the military informs me many messages are marked as urgent or immediate attention or whatever. Also, many are over-classified, sent as top secret when they contain no classified information. The result is that many messages are read by some GS-5 file clerk and thrown in the burn bag.
brush
(53,778 posts)Give it a rest already. Stop doing repug dirt.
Haven't you heard at all of the timeline of Stevens death?
You're implying that he was sending urgent messages to the SOS while the attack was in progress.
That is not what happened at all. He was caught out in an area without bodyguards in an area he normally would not have gone.
Who knows why he was there but there certainly weren't any urgent messages being sent to Hillary by Stevens while the attack happened.
Again, stop with the repug dirt.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)in a hurry, a rescue plan should have been prepared. Note that ever since Benghazi, we have troops and ships on standby, ready to get our personnel out of Yemen, South Sudan, etc. Edit to add: the people most responsible for Stevens getting less security than needed were Undersecretary Kennedy at State and Leon Panetta, who (probably inadvertently) signed off on a reduced security detail. I cannot remember where I read this, though--I think it was Congressional testimony by some witness.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)When you do away with money to various programs, they can't do as much as they used to. They have LESS PEOPLE! That same statement applies to every program! When the next bridge in the US collapses, or levees fail in a bad storm, REMEMBER who is at fault! I know I will!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Is that what you're saying?
brush
(53,778 posts)Haven't you heard at all of the timeline of Stevens death?
You're implying that he was sending urgent messages to her while the attack was in progress.
That is not what happened at all. He was caught out in an area without bodyguards in an area he normally would not have gone.
Who knows why he was there but there certainly weren't any urgent messages being sent to Hillary by Stevens while the attack happened.
You're also ignoring that the repugs cut the security budget for all embassies at the time.
Your OP sounds like something that came out of Benghazi hearings, implying that Hillary failed to send troops that could have saved the ambassador.
What is this really about? Is it your intent to revive "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi" to go along with the current repug non-scandal, the one about Hillary's emails?
Good luck with that. I think you'll have better luck on right wing sites though.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)She is not guaranteed that, but they are willing to spend billions to keep her out of office and forget who is funding this. It's the methodology the GOP has used since Nixon and his CREEP group worked to divide all Democrats.
And these are the same people who have taken over the government, media and American mind since then. People have, as JAG says, BAMBOZZLED and are still clininging onto the illusions they were sold.
napi21
(45,806 posts)other than the Secretary. If they KNEW, because of budget cuts, there was no possibility of sending additional security, why would they forward that email to the Secretary?
One thing I do know for sure is that when they knew there was real trouble, there were no planes availabler within ay reasonable striking distance to lend assistance. The closest base was Sigonella in Sicily, and not only did they not have any planes that cpuld do the job, they were still way too far away. I know that because my son worked at Sigonella at the time.
procon
(15,805 posts)She drank all my wine and stole my stash, too.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)We don't hear about that much... do we?
An American Ambassador. Murdered. You laugh at me because I think it happened because of deficiencies at the Hillary Clinton run State Department.
Okay.
Why don't YOU tell me why he was murdered then... and drop the fuckhead in Cerritos, California defense. It's bullshit and everyone knows it.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)it might turn to gold.
procon
(15,805 posts)although as soon as I figure out that riddle, maybe we could compare prescriptions?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)That video was the one Hillary Clinton and President Obama blamed for Christopher Stevens' death.
The only meds I take are to control my blood pressure, but thanks for your concern.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)who fucking HATE Hillary Clinton have found absolutely nothing.
What exactly do you think is being hidden here?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)When I was 4 years old, my parents took me to see Old Yeller. Big mistake! The only thing I remembered from the whole movie was when they shot the dog. For two weeks after seeing the movie, I would randomly burst into tears and start yelling about killing Old Yeller.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)That woman was bad to the bone
She never cried when old Yeller died
So do you think I'll cry when she's gone
Kind of like the motto that if your dog doesn't like someone, stay away. Dogs can sense things we can't, you know.
Just kidding, but anyone can say anything about HRC and it get justified. Like she doesn't put on her pants one leg at time like the rest of us do, whatever.
Like Obama, depository of the national ID.
Laser102
(816 posts)And I'm still laughing. Good thing no one but my dog is around to hear it. He already thinks I'm crazy.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Maybe it is a real case of mismanagement and that's why the GOPs love attacking with it.
The much bigger problem though is the whole Libya policy in general, thinking they could knock down a government and anything but chaos would follow.
It would be kind of like criticizing Bush for mismanaging the invasion of Iraq. Yeah he did, but it distracts from the real issue that we shouldn't have been there in the first place.
GOPs focus on Benghazi because that's all they have, since most of them supported the disastrous Libya policy in the first place.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)is not like calling 911. Unfortunately Stevens was located at an outpost, he was outside of the protected area of an embassy. Placing the blame on Hillary for cuts in the budget which did not afford luxury of having more protection for the outpost would be a problem. This is a tragedy and what is also bad is to blame one person in government for this event. FOX is really doing a number on people along with the RUSH type.
napi21
(45,806 posts)I KNOW that's true because my son worked there at the time. Benghazi is in such a remote place, no help was available from anywhere.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)anything, including Rush Limbaugh talking points in order to take Hillary down.
Hope your proud of yourself that you stooped to this level.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)to "right wing talking points" in a weak effort to sweep everything you don't like under the rug... and
Pretend you're doing nothing more than stifling discussion.
An American Ambassador was murdered on Hillary Clinton's watch. She either knew he was in jeopardy or she didn't. If she did, she's a liar. If she didn't, she's an ineffective manager.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)It happened on his watch... yes. But how could he possibly be held accountable when the head of the State Department claims not to have seen the URGENT cables he sent requestion added security?
The head of the State Department is on record as not having read URGENT messages sent by her direct underlings (Ambassadors) requesting extra security in deteriorating conditions.
Does that not indicate a problem of some sort?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)points to bring her down.
I don't believe you that you are upset by this. I think you are just looking for s reaction and judging by the reavtions no one likes your post.
840high
(17,196 posts)and don't trust would be better. Hate is a strong rmotion which I would not waste on Hillary,
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Supporter and I absolutely hate this "Benghazi" thread. I'm surprised it has survived.
Yes, I'll vote for Sec. Clinton if she is the nominee. But I won't trash her.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)And I disavow them.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)anything in order to take Sanders down."
You do realize that that is probably just as true, right?
Maybe a difference in numbers, here.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)About Hillary here.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)I say this as a Sanders supporter- we're better than this. Don't go there. Plenty of policy reasons to oppose her on.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Response to TDale313 (Reply #19)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
still_one
(92,190 posts)the GOP cuts to embassy security prior to this?
This is probably one of the more inane arguments that I have heard not to vote for Hillary if she is the nominee.
Then you pull out of your ass the assertion that she knew about the request, and accuse her of lying? I know where the B.S. is coming from all right
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)to decry budget cuts, he might still be alive.
Either scenario tells me she's not qualified to sit at the top of the mountain.
still_one
(92,190 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)If, if, if, if. Too many ifs, but you seem certain that she did, and you come off that way. Exactly the way faux, Limbaugh, coulter, etc would frame it. I ain't buying the sincerity one bit. You're better off shouting 'I HATE HILLARY CLINTON!!!' Way more believable.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I ask you to reconsider this op.
I have problems with her involvement in Libya also and I don't believe we will ever get a full account but this serves no one well
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... who tries to find the silver lining behind every cloud.
So in that vein, I'm happy to know that DemocraticUnderground is now a one-stop-shopping website, and I no longer have to go elsewhere to read the latest right-wing bullshit - because it's now available here, 24/7.
riversedge
(70,215 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... with all the fixin's!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But now it is like a bad habbit that i can't kick.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... like a TV show that's so bad, you can't stop watching it.
The site could still be relevant again. Just add the thingy to the DU logo, and it'll all make sense.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)So sad.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... on DemocraticUnderground, you're the one who doesn't belong.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)Those juries can be brutal.
"Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Democratic Party?"
I understand you can get blacklisted if you give the wrong answer.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)There are plenty of us lifelong Democrats on DU. Some of us even welcome others to the party.
MADem
(135,425 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)Then I opened this. I thought wrong. Clearly.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)the most filthy right wing lies, disinformation, hate radio propaganda like the OP's fox news BS not only gets a pass from the owners of "democratic" underground, but...
All of the slavish acolytes of Bernie buy right into it with gusto!
still_one
(92,190 posts)pathetic
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Or obfuscate.
I know what you're better at.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... so Stevens had to die.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)mcar
(42,329 posts)Think I'll try a helping of that to get through the primary season.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)riversedge
(70,215 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)What... See Jane Run is more your speed?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Note to jury he posted right wing shit.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)But you go on with your bad self.
If I've posted something worth hiding... I'm sure it'll be hidden at oh... about three a.m. or so.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You outed yourself here.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)It doesn't have a radio. I spend my day listening to a screaming diesel engine that drives a screaming hydraulic pump. If I HAD a radio I'd be listening to MUSIC. I do it eight plus hours a day. Would that I HAD something to listen to other than my truck.
How in the world would you surmise I know his "talking points"?
If you know me at all, you know I say what I think; not what others tell me and I do it without apology or explanation.
I couldn't listen to talk radio if I WANTED TO, and when I come home, the LAST thing I watch is fox. TV is for me entertainment and I don't consider ANY TV espousing a political viewpoint to be entertaining.
I don't get how anyone who knows me could ever think I get "talking points".
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Radio waves. A filling in a molar acts as a recorder and sends limpdick's words into my brain while I sleep.
I'm still working on learning how to read...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Stick-figure smiley. I'm now convinced I should self-delete the OP.
Tell you what. I'm out. If you think I'm so wrong in posting the opinion I did... alert on it. It's all good. I've seen and recommended many posts of yours I agree with. I don't mind disagreeing with people who will mark the same box on the ballot I will, nor do I mind what they might say about my opinion. But... if it's SO wrong; see that it gets removed so it doesn't bother too many beautiful minds.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Night.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'll give you that much.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)no words.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)You are way out of line on this.
applegrove
(118,653 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 29, 2015, 03:09 AM - Edit history (1)
The fact that there are so few casualties is a miracle. Way to parrot GOP fake scandals.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)How many American Ambassadors have been murdered in the HISTORY of this country?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)brush
(53,778 posts)You need to get off the right wing crappola.
During Bush's administration there were many more attacks against our diplomatic outposts than under Obama/Clinton. Why don't you know this? (Doesn't fit you narrative, maybe?)
Why the hell are you hyperventilating about with this now? Like this "Hillary is the blame for Steven's death" hasn't been yelled from the rooftops by repugs years ago during the Benghazi hearings.
We don't need right wing talking points here.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Not one.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)Someone actually did back you by rec'ing this. SMH
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)KMOD
(7,906 posts)and this is garbage. I don't expect very many to back this.
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)I don't recognize this site. DU? Sadly, not anymore.
Response to KMOD (Reply #81)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Response to KMOD (Reply #116)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cha
(297,216 posts)Ignorantly trying to blame President Obama and Hillary Clinton for this terrible tragedy.
It's the Republicons who Cut Funding for Embassy Security
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
House GOP, Paul Ryan Cut $400M from Embassy Safety Funding
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/20/1147325/-House-GOP-Paul-Ryan-Cut-400M-from-Embassy-Safety-Funding#
But, they're carrying water for the gop right here on du.. It says everything about them and nothing about their target.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)I have actually lived in Tripoli, Libya. My dad was stationed at Wheelus AFB from 60-64. My brother holds duel citizenship.
And I don't care, I don't care if it was Hillary, or Bernie or Donald Trump. I don't care about Libya or e mails or Bill Clinton. They will not have any influence on my decision on who to vote for.
that is all.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Thank you!
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)MelungeonWoman
(502 posts)This is reminiscent of Zell Millers breakdown.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)There was a two-year investigation into the Benghazi tragedy by the Republican-led House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It proved right-wing conspiracy theorists to be flat wrong and their attacks to be baseless.The committees report was released on November 21, 2014, by Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI), and Ranking Member Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD). The report debunks past and ongoing right-wing attacks on Hillary Clinton and further proves that the right wing is playing politics on the backs of dead Americans in an attempt to score political points. The report adds to the extensive reporting already completed by the ten congressional committees involved in investigating Benghazi.
There was neither a stand down order nor a denial of available air support, and no American was "left behind," the panel concluded. The panel found that there was "no evidence of an intelligence failure" prior to the attack the CIA did not have tactical warning that it was imminent.
As Jonathan Capehart said in the Washinton Post, "After two years of investigation, it found no evidence to buttress any of the conspiracy theories surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans. In short, all of the things that were alleged to have happened didnt happen.
And yet you took to DU posting a fact-free all-caps laced tirade of these debunked conspiracy theories to trash our Democratic frontrunner.
DU has really reached a new low.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)a real embassy and not a dangerous outpost, for one thing, on Sept. 11. With better security. Or just evacuated out altogether (which we do more often now, in reaction to Benghazi--can't afford another of those). But he remained and was up to something CIA-related, even though other countries were pulling their diplomatic personnel due to deteriorating conditions. A lot of it is hindsight, terror attacks happen in bad parts of the world, but the ball was very definitely dropped by several agencies--State, DoD, and CIA. Edit to add: Republicans can only dig so far, because it will blow back on them and their beloved intelligence and military communities.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)There is no evidence to support blaming the agencies. It only lets the GOP --and terrorists themselves--off the hook.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Unbelievable.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Regardless of the budget picture from year to year by Congress. DoD certainly has the funding and is responsible for embassy security/evacuation to varying degrees along with State--we now are much better at moving (very expensive) assets in place when trouble brews, it's really not a money issue when shit goes bad. Not saying it played no role at all, but Stevens' situation was more complicated.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)More money would have meant better security. The State Department performed its responsibilities the best it could with the money they had. Even the GOP report concluded that.
And yet you beg to differ.
Like I said, DU has hit a new low.
FarPoint
(12,366 posts)Additionally, they continue to cut the funding.
OLDMADAM
(82 posts)After reading hundreds of posts, balancing opinions on all sides, I've arrived at a point of view that I support..
Your post, IMHO, outlines the clearest evidence to date that this debacle was a tragic failure of the system of accountability and responsibility, at the highest levels of several agencies of our Government.. There is risk-less mentality in every major enterprise, where nobody, least of all the highest levels, wants to accept the Hot Potato, and be the last one called into question for making any serious decisions .. CYA, is paramount to protecting ones own job, and legacy..
This entire tragedy was avoidable if only if we lived in Wonderland, and nobody wanted to kill us.. Black-ops were and are necessary in this real world, filled with tyrants, and this is what happens trying to protect them..
Ironically, the only statement that honestly sums up this situation, in retrospect, came from Hillary in her What difference does it make, disgraceful defense, after the moronic Video Defense roll-out failed miserably, because it will only make a difference to the families and friends of the loved ones of the fallen.. In the end, nothing will change..
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)quote taken out of context? Really? I predict Vince Foster "just asking questions" will make it's appearance here soon.
Here's the quote,in context,sans the Fox News "fauxrage":
With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they'd they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we'll figure out what was going on in the meantime.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Now we get to what this is really about. You didn't suddenly start to develop concern for Chris Stevens years after the fact. You see your precious white male privilege slipping away and it makes you furious.
No one gives a shit about your right-wing Benghazi bullshit, and I seriously doubt you do either. You obviously don't give a shit about Chris Stevens or you would respect his families wishes rather than use him in a desperate political ploy. This is what really bothers you, as evidenced by the caps:
It doesn't matter how desperate, angry, and outraged you get. Democrats don't share your "concern" about Benghazi and they don't share your disdain about the prospect of "the FIRST FEMALE president." It's good to have it out in the open though so we can dispense with any pretense that the Democratic Party suddenly now isn't left enough when all the candidates are running to the left of any in the past several decades. There is nothing democratic, Democratic, liberal, progressive, or leftist about your outrage. The fact is time is moving on, and no matter how angry you get you cannot turn the clock back.
Clearly Hillary Clinton threatens you a great deal for you to be so irrationally angry over her potential election, and it obviously has nothing to do with issues.
I am really looking forward to November 8, 2016.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)the DAY it happened, and had my post hidden for blaming it on those who killed him.
Nice try though, albeit a waste of words on your part.
P.S. I'll find it and post a link to it if you wish.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)but there are other people who read this site. Everything in the world isn't for your benefit alone, just like people in this country are going to vote for whomever they like, and it may just result in the "first FEMALE PRESIDENT."
I'll take your word for the fact that this isn't your first right-wing diatribe on Benghazi.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I don't mind.
I'll likely put my mark in the same box you will on election day... call me what you will I don't mind; whatever gets you through the night is alright in my book.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Americans will make their own democratic choices, which is exactly how it should be.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)is an inability to respect one's fellow citizens' democratic choices?
Firstly, my political consciousness is not limited to contests among the political elite. I care about issues far more enduring and important--related to social justice--the sorts of things the privileged turn their nose up, but that mean a hell of a lot more in people's lives than cabinet appointments. And despite the noise and nonsense, I do manage to learn from the perspectives from a few people on this site.
Then there is stuff like this, which is sort of like a 10 car pile up on the highway. I know I shouldn't rubberneck, but somehow I just can't help myself.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I don't care what sexuality the person is. I care what issues they support.
I also need to trust them. For those reasons, Bernie gets my vote.
Accusing wveryyone on DU that doesn't support Hillary of somehow being misogynistic is sickening. Especially in light of the fact that many of us are women that have always supported women's rights (as does Bernie). Nor are we racists but that you already knew.
I am not posting in support of this OP because I don't believe Hillary purposely ignored anything. But, I'll be damned if I will let you use this post as a reason to demonize a good man and his DU supporters just because of it.
Welcome back, btw.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)He's the one who brought up "the FIRST FEMALE president." Not me.
But, I'll be damned if I will let you use this post as a reason to demonize a good man and his DU supporters just because of it.
Where did I go to be welcomed back from?
Where did I go to be welcome backed from?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Check the thread and you can see that I am replying to your post not the OP's.
How the heck would I know where you went? I just noticed you weren't here. Is a welcome back, somehow threatening to you?
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I didn't say or imply that not voting for Hillary was itself misogynistic. I responded specifically to what the OP said.
I said nothing about Sanders or his supporters. You are accusing me of a load of things I did not do, and frankly it's strange, particularly the bit about Sanders.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Strange? I'll have to defer to you on that one.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)which is a complete and false character assassination of a Democrat, Hillary Clinton, you whine about some imaginary attack on BS.
You're not upset about the false claims about Clinton, or that the OP follows that rant by proclaiming disdainfully that she is seeking to be "the FIRST FEMALE president." No, your response is to tell me you will not let me say something I didn't say but you seem to imagine I am guilty of some sort of thought crime. Not only did i not mention Sanders, but that your response is, apparently, to demand I not even think anything unfavorable of him. People can trash, smear, insult, demean Clinton and her supporters day after day, and even in one of those threads you insist on conformity to Sanders. Everything is about Sanders. He comes before the rest of the human race, so that the mere idea that someone might harbor a thought that is even slightly critical of him results in a lecture from you.
That kind of attitude that some people are superior to others that justifies such egregious disparities in treatment is anti-egalitarian. In becomes very difficult for me to believe such hierarchical notions of human worth would not likewise be present in policy and government.
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)I'm far more worried about the bankster coddling thing myself.
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
A definite new low
JI7
(89,249 posts)and other similar things when it was their own districts and states that were hit and they were asking for aid.
so this type of post from you doesn't make any sense.
budget cuts aren't a secret . do you really think any politician who complains about budget cuts is going to get this media which is all about donald trump right now is going to report on those type of issues ?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)NOR would I accept the notion that your choice of who represents you either entitle or disqualify you from receiving tax dollars in aid. I'm not stupid enough to believe the "bad guys" are the ONLY ones who live in areas stricken by natural disasters. Your tax dollars aren't worth more than mine, nor are mine more important than yours. The tax dollars contributed by Californians aren't worth more than those contributed by Floridians.
I don't engage in geographic bigotry as do a large number of people on this site. I will ALWAYS post in disagreement with someone who says people in a certain state aren't or shouldn't be entitled to the same tax dollars we ALL contribute due to the people they choose to represent them. Are you fucking KIDDING?
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)but the "first FEMALE PRESIDENT," that's unacceptable.
You've exposed yourself tonight. It doesn't surprise me, but a few of your fellow Sanders supporters seem to feel compelled to distance themselves from you.
JI7
(89,249 posts)On how they denied aid to others. You had a problem with just calling them out.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)and 95 years since the 19th Amendment.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Cha
(297,216 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)They report to a regional (generally) or functional (occasionally) Assistant Secretary, who reports to an Undersecretary, who reports to a Deputy Secretary, who reports to the Secretary.
TopHatCat
(20 posts)Please.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)This is over the top and just plain wrong.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I do not know much on this subject, but it appears to be heading the way of 9/11. A forbidden topic. This probably even moreso, because the right wing was up in arms.
Party politics suck.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)this post is idiotic.
Lol whut?
Yes we know Chris Stevens died. Ok, technically he was Clinton's employee. He was also a seasoned diplomat who knew the risks. But yeah, she pulled the trigger.
If you hate Hillary this much there are other choices. But this post is just more Benghaaaaaaaaazi! Bullshit.
Someone was murdered in Vermont last week, thus I could never vote for Sanders!
Vinca
(50,271 posts)I've always wondered about that. And who cut the budget for security? It wasn't Hillary. I'm a Bernie supporter, but I realize bad things happen that cannot be prevented by the head of the department and it happens under both Democratic and Republican administrations.
Demit
(11,238 posts)He was always going out among the people. There was a really nice, detailed profile of him in the NYT Magazine soon after he died.
It was never really explained what his purpose was in traveling to that outpost, where the CIA had a base. I've seen speculation that he was overseeing a shipment of guns to rebel forces.
So yeah, I'd say he was doing things the way he liked to do them. He knew the risks. This OP is melodramatic shit-stirring.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)crap to the Right.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)BENGHAZI!!! and FIRST FEMALE President.
You know what? Hillary doesn't want your support or need your support.
These boys do though:
[img][/img]
Cha
(297,216 posts)course they didn't.
So who takes it up to add to their pain.. if they were ever unfortunate enough to run across it? A BS supporter in Bernie's name.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)before the Hillary hate went full on Freeper here. Not surprised at all.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)And PS, I am an undecided primary voter, so my position is not based on the Hillary/Bernie war.
It is based on the fact that this bullshit does not belong on a Democratic site.
Grow up. Your candidate is ashamed of your tactics.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)LonePirate
(13,420 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)That's all I'll say about that.
JI7
(89,249 posts)Gothmog
(145,231 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 29, 2015, 09:17 AM - Edit history (1)
For better or worse, the State Department has ALWAYS had a mix of ambassadors: some are career diplomats, some are political appointees.
This has been true of every administration I know about or have read about.
I'm sure that career diplomats/foreign service officers would have choice words to say about having to put up with political appointees, who, to be as kind as I can, are variable in quality and expertise.(Sometimes political appointees can truly be good; but there are a lot of embarrassing ones, too).
But that's just the way it's always been, no matter what the administration. It's not new.And it's in fact a perennial debate, which usually surfaces every time an embarrassingly unqualified political appointee comes up for senate confirmation, or embarrasses themselves while on duty.
As far as I can tell, ambassadors to "trouble spot" countries are almost always career diplomats. Political appointees are usually assigned to "easier" or more stable countries.
Chris Stevens was a career diplomat (and by all accounts a wonderful and courageous one, and his death is a real loss).
Caroline Kennedy is a political appointee; to say the least, she was not picked because of her deep knowledge of the Japanese language.
And, BTW, "Benghazi" is a completely manufactured non-scandal.
Stevens' death was a real tragedy, and, given the instability of especially that part of the world, the State Department probably does need to work on more effective ways of improving security -- and this is the hard part --without walling off US staff from the countries they're supposed to be dealing with. In hostile or unstable countries, this balancing act will always be a challenge, and one for which there is never a single or ultimate solution.
But as far as "Benghazi" is concerned, there is no there there.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)It's going to be a problem if she's nominated.
K and R
Off topic, but: Caroline Kennedy can barely speak English, much less Japanese. As anyone who was around here when the NYS DEM Party was trying to transplant her into a US Senate vacancy (Guess who's seat.) a few years ago can attest.
Mother o' god what a disaster.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Feel free... The OP didn't.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Have fun voting for the Republican.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)A jury voted 3-4 to leave this POS BENGHAAAAAAAZZZIIIIIII! post.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)voted to let this teabag right wind screed stand!
All of the Bernie followers on that jury should be ashamed of yourself for doing the work of the koch bros and Limbaugh!
SHAME ON ALL OF YOU!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)You can alert again and it will go straight to Admin.
This crap is so far over the top, Admin needs to deal with this garbage.
Enough is enough...
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Kali
(55,008 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)This Bernie supporter disagrees with the OP.
George II
(67,782 posts)...by Congressional committees chaired by REPUBLICANS that have cleared her of any wrongdoing.
I'm sorry I spent even a few seconds reading and responding to this garbage.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)That draws attention too. A lot of attention. It's not a panacea.
It amazes me how Hillary is blamed for an Ambassador's death in a foreign war zone, yet when 3,000 people were killed on American soil in NYC and DC, Bush's approval rating soared and nary a word of criticism was heard.
It is likely that someone in the 17th of February brigade or the oil company relayed the message that Stevens would be in town for his oil company meeting.
How much security would have been sufficient to protect Stevens? A squad? He already had that. A platoon? A battalion?
Visiting a war zone is a risk and Benghazi was a war zone. Protecting people in a war zone is difficult and problematic. I assume State thought that the remaining security detail and others were enough. They were wrong in hindsight.
A better question is why did we help to initiate the Libyan war in the first place? Why were there cheerleaders for it posting soviet-like propaganda on DU and elsewhere?
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts).... totally right about point #2.
>>>t amazes me how Hillary is blamed for an Ambassador's death in a foreign war zone, yet when 3,000 people were killed on American soil in NYC and DC, Bush's approval rating soared and nary a word of criticism was heard.
>>>>
Come on. It was argued publicly here and everywhere else post 9-11. For YEARS. . Condoleeza Rice , NSA at that point, failed to act on the "Al Qaeda determine to attack in US" memo . It makes up a whole section of Michael Moore's documentary re. Bush's first term.
Ya' got a not-starter there.
OTOH:
>>>A better question is why did we help to initiate the Libyan war in the first place? Why were there cheerleaders for it posting soviet-like propaganda on DU and elsewhere? >>>>
Now yer' talkin'.
But no one else is. Tragically.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)It took quite a while and only started to harm Bush after the Iraq War went awry.
Benghazi was front and center from the get go. Why is that?
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)You've gone full Benghazi? Seriously? Are you sure your name isn't really cherokeeteaparty?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)but, hey, here at DU, we don't care.
I remember the first 48 hours after the incident; the right wing was producing articles alleging Ambassador Stevens was:
a. Gay.
b. The Muslims were upset about his being gay and were retaliating against him for messing with Arab boys.
c. Innocent people were killed because the Ambassador was gay and because he was messing with Arab boys.
For informational purposes about the what right wing and the Republicans were saying, I posted those articles here on DU. A whole lot of people filed alerts about the posts and chastised me for "smearing" the Ambassador.
Of course, within 48 to 72 hours after the incident, the wingers changed their story, "it's Hillary's fault! It's Hillary's fault," lovingly and deceptively overlooking the fact the GOP Congress had reduced the funding for security at U.S. embassies. I'm waiting for the post from a DU'er stating the Ambassador got what he deserved because "he was gay and he was messing with the Arab boys." This OP has proven it's very possible that will be the next attack line; if someone proven to not be responsible for Benghazi (six times no less) is held responsible for it, then it can only be a matter of time before the homophobia breaks out too.
Sad, really sad to see what this 2016 Primary has done to DU
George II
(67,782 posts)....into Free Republic or the "Excellence in Broadcasting" studio.
If six investigations led by republicans have found no culpability, one has to wonder why an OP like this shows up on a presumably progressive DEMOCRATIC website.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)needed security to the out post. Actually Ambassador Stevens was supposed to be setting up security on this visit, had not happened yet.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sheshe2
(83,758 posts)That this place is rapidly deteriorating to the point of no return. RW talking points abound here now.
Thanks for a dose of reality here Don.
edit spelling
George II
(67,782 posts)Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)We had a consulate and a CIA station in Benghazi.
Less than one year before Christopher Stevens was murdered, Libya had fought an all-out civil war. That war ended with the total destruction of Gaddafi's army by U.S. airpower on the highway outside of Benghazi. Benghazi was an insecure and risky place for Americans. Everyone was aware of the risks and dangers.
The American government decided that it was important to immediately establish an official diplomatic presence in the city. A property was found and arrangements were quickly made to open a consulate. The consulate was less secure than established diplomatic offices in other places, but it was opened quickly for specific purposes -- notwithstanding the known risks.
The American government and the State Department chooses to operate in dangerous places. We could choose not to and then no State Department employees would ever be put at risk.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Four or so years late freeper nonsense, at that.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)The US was dragged into this conflict by some of our NATO partners in the EU who wanted to get their hands on Libya's oil, and they found allies in American officials like SoD Leon Panetta and SoS Hillary ("We came, we saw, he died" Clinton.
The west was left completely helpless in the wake of Gaddafi's death and the entire country became a dangerous place for westerners to be. And a year later, predictably, there were tragic consequences.
But in retrospect, none of this would have happened if Hillary Clinton hadn't been so eager to show the world how tough she was.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Oh, wait...
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)RIGHT FUCKING NOW!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)mcar
(42,329 posts)OP has not made one reply to this debunked RW tripe.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Bernie would spit on your post. But since he doesn't post here, I'll do it for him.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)So everyone can see you for who you really are.
FarPoint
(12,366 posts)Totally shameful for DU .....Seeing such rhetoric makes DU so insignificant theses days. We have and still can do much, much better.
Faux pas
(14,675 posts)dem in texas
(2,674 posts)The killing of Ambassador Stevens was a sad event, a real tragedy. But, it has been thoroughly investigated and it is over, although Fox and your right-wing buddies are trying to keep it alive. And not all Ambassadors are trained. Many are major political contributors, this is nothing new, it has always gone on. There was once a Broadway musical about a politically appointed ambassador, don't remember the name of the show, but Ethel Mermann was the star.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Masks are slipping left and right.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)They can take them right off and carry on without consequence.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)What makes Benghazi different is the ambassador was killed. In most other attacks it was lower level people, often times locals working for the US.
However, I don't think that makes their lives less valuable than the ambassador's life.
I don't think HRC can be disqualified because she just happened to be the SoS when an ambassador was among the dead.
There are plenty of reasons to choose a candidate other than Hillary Clinton. I just don't think this is a good reason to disqualify her.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)We had a consulate and a CIA station in Benghazi.
Rstrstx
(1,399 posts)We were one of the very, very few countries to have one in Libya at the time, having reopened in 2011. The security risk was so high Iran didn't have one there. Anyone who went to work there was aware of the extremely high risk involved.
The right of course (and now apparently even some "Democrats" would have you believe Obama went over there and personally shot the place up himself. Oh wait, sorry how stupid of me, Obama's not running any more, it was HILLARY that went over and attacked the consulate. Yeah that's it, it's all her fault.
Since we all know she was getting super-classified emails on her highly insecure private server in the house closet (or was it bathroom?) the ambassador's messages for a few bodyguards should have popped right up in a little text box on her phone. All she had to do was pick up her unsecured phone and send in the Marines. Or call up the local nightclub and have them send over a few bouncers. Whatever, doesn't matter, it's all Oba...sorry, Hillary's fault.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)There was an embassy in Tripoli.
It was very dangerous there. Libya had fought an all out civil war less than a year earlier -- a war that ended when U.S. air power destroyed Gadaffi's army on the highway outside of Benghazi.
BKH70041
(961 posts)Take the way the members here view what happened now and document them.
Then, turn back time and have the exact same events unfold in the exact same way -- no differences in what happened or how each office holder reacted -- but make those office holders Republicans.
Then get the two reactions and compare them.
Guarantee you the reactions of the members here will be 180 degrees opposite based upon the political party of the players in government.
Good point.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)and you only now see strange changes in views? Is Gitmo still open?
BKH70041
(961 posts)I see excuses and rationalizing. I see a lot of circling the wagons. I see a lot of turning a blind eye to reality.
I'm not the only one who sees it.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)Benghazi has been beaten to death by the GOPers and it's been shown repeatedly that there's no there there. Since there are plenty of reasons to criticize Hillary based on her real policy positions, why on earth bring up this crap? I'm surprised this post wasn't hidden.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Your post reads like something pulled directly from a right wing web site. It is a senseless, falsified attack on a Democrat. Please remove it. Thank you.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Even after an exhaustive unnecessary inquiry with a majority of Republicans finding that the State Department could not have done anything to prevent the attacks you are still screeching about BENGHAZI!! And implying that Hillary Clinton could have....what?.....put on a cape like Superwoman and flew out to Libya and fought of the angry mob? Even the general in charge of the closet military post testified that he could never have reached that compound in time. Only the most extreme elements in the bagger wing of the GOP and Fox News still cling to this fake "scandal".....oh, and yourself. Nice company.
I as a Bernie supporter think this kind of "catapulting the propaganda" BS harms the whole party. Just like trying to foment the "Bernie Sanders doesn't care about black people" stupidity from a few in the Hillary camp.
All you do is encourage the same childish behavior from some of the few whackos or trolls to link to your OP as an expample of the behaviour of ALL Bernie supporters. And it becomes a snowball. And snowballs run downhill.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)eom
Arkana
(24,347 posts)or you have completely lost your fucking mind.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)TSIAS
(14,689 posts)A Sanders (presumably) supporter is posting right-wing spin to discredit Clinton. I also saw a Clinton supporter posting from the World Socialist news to criticize Sanders. What is this world coming to?
Spazito
(50,338 posts)Ugly, ugly, ugly rw shit.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)who said that Sanders supporters there were so unhinged that she didn't "feel safe" around them. This was right around the time the entire Internet first started chewing these people out for their behavior. This poster thought it was just knee slapping when I told him this.
So for alot of us, this person's "credibility" has been a lost cause for a long time.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)for the right-wing BS it is -- and it probably would have been damn near tombstone-worthy.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)The premise of the OP is disgusting.
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
Puzzledtraveller This message was self-deleted by its author.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)it is acceptable to think. We would have been up in arms if it had been under the watch of republican admin.
Cha
(297,216 posts)does most of this thread.
It's the Republicons who cut the damn Embassy Security Funding... What's really "nice" is getting the whole picture.
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jason-chaffetz-embassy_n_1954912.html
House GOP, Paul Ryan Cut $400M from Embassy Safety Funding
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/20/1147325/-House-GOP-Paul-Ryan-Cut-400M-from-Embassy-Safety-Funding#
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)What has happened to this place?
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)The GOP controlled House was not allowing any more funding. There are several items that make me support Bernie over Hillary, but a bullshit right wing talking point isn't one of them.
yardwork
(61,608 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Jan. 22, '02 U.S. Consulate at Kolkata, 5 killed
June 14, '02 U.S Consulate at Karachi, 12 killed
Feb. 28, '03 U.S. Embassy at Islamabad, 2 killed
June 30, '04 U.S. Embassy at Tashkent, 2 killed
Dec. 6, '04 U.S. Compound at Saudia Arabia, 9 killed
March 2, '06 U.S. Consulate at Karachi, 2 killed
Sept. 12, '06 U.S. Embassy at Syria, 4 killed
March 18, '08 U.S. Embassy at Yemen, 2 killed
July 9, '08 U.S. Consulate at Istanbul, 6 killed
Sept. 17, '08 U.S. Embassy at Yemern, 16 killed
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
Agschmid This message was self-deleted by its author.
yikes1
(22 posts)Really, what are you carrying fox's water. I do not care for Hillary, but you are really rolling in the mud on this one!!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I always knew what you were, but now you've really exposed yourself to all of DU.
Thanks.
revmclaren
(2,523 posts)Screen shot op and rec list for future reference.
Beyond appalling. Showed this to my coworkers, 2 of whom are sanders supporters and got jaw-dropping stares.
Again, just wow!!!
Cha
(297,216 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)and lies, and spewing them as gospel
This thread is pure flame bair, and with posts like this, I would suspect they have effectively alienated a fair number of people on DU.
This thread will go down as one of the low points in DU history
RandySF
(58,807 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Sorry, I just had to do that for shits and giggles.
Z_California
(650 posts)Of right wing bullshit propaganda on DU. I haven't gone through the comments but I can't believe this thread is still here.
dsc
(52,161 posts)I am glad that some Sanders supporters do have some standards, but apparently 21 of them (you and the 20 who recommended this vile piece of filth) have none. I wonder, can you even name, let alone show a post you wrote about, any of the several embassy employees who were killed during the Bush years. Can you name even one? One single, solitary name.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will be the bigger poster and just say some times really bad things happen despite our best efforts.
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Original post)
steve2470 This message was self-deleted by its author.
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)Someone carrying Gowdys water!!!!!!
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)... after being sent into a war zone. We normally pull ambassadors *out* of war zones. We certainly don't open up new embassies right in the middle of one. Except, allegedly, this one time.
And the head of the CIA ended his testimony to the first GOP committee, "that is as close to the truth as I can come."
To that I would say, "this is as close to a public admission that this was a CIA operation, not State, that he can come."
I am one of those DUers who will not vote for Hillary even if she wins the nomination. But this story does not pass the smell test. There is no freaking way Stevens was not acting as a CIA operative in this instance. And CIA operatives get killed in the field. It is part of the job.