Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:52 AM Aug 2015

Poll: Bernie's lack of Congressional endosements...


58 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Reflects poorly on Bernie
3 (5%)
Reflects poorly on Congress
53 (91%)
I prefer not to answer because Greenwald is still out there, alive and well. He's waiting, waiting...
1 (2%)
Other
1 (2%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll: Bernie's lack of Congressional endosements... (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 OP
PAY ATTENTION TO ME JI7 Aug 2015 #1
I've barely got internet access lately and am missing a great deal Voice for Peace Aug 2015 #3
Long list of endorsements for another candidate AllyCat Aug 2015 #16
Certainly he's not as well-feared. senz Aug 2015 #47
Ok, you've got my attention MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 #4
There should be a name for the tactic of getting the first response to an OP rhett o rick Aug 2015 #74
!!! MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 #75
There is Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #83
I am glad you brought that up. For some the goal here is to have honest, decent rhett o rick Aug 2015 #95
Wrong Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #96
The point of the OP was certainly about Sen Sanders, it even states his name in rhett o rick Aug 2015 #97
Why? merrily Aug 2015 #23
Sorry, was paying attention to Manny. Have you posted an interesting OP I should look at? Autumn Aug 2015 #28
I would if you really had something to say. nm rhett o rick Aug 2015 #73
Reflects Corporate money is too afraid of him... cascadiance Aug 2015 #2
Funny they weren't afraid to "pay the price" in '08. They had no problem lunamagica Aug 2015 #14
I know, and look at all the banksters and CEOs he locked up. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #15
They endorsed Obama Le Taz Hot Aug 2015 #38
But the meme is that "They want Bernie, but are afraid of the Clinton Machine". Obviously lunamagica Aug 2015 #40
I don't read it that way. Maedhros Aug 2015 #77
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #84
Dealing with the enormous power of Big Money is not being a shill, any more than Hortensis Aug 2015 #53
Obama had far fewer endorsements than Clinton in 2008 until he started winning. (nt) jeff47 Aug 2015 #43
But Sanders has NOT even ONE congressional endorsment lunamagica Aug 2015 #54
You mean fear of the Clinton machine that came from those 2008 Obama endorsements? jeff47 Aug 2015 #57
It certainly is odd. KMOD Aug 2015 #5
Why haven't members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus endorsed him? Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #6
... MannyGoldstein Aug 2015 #7
Every year the CPC releases their budget, DU collectively swoons Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #10
LMAO! beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #11
Okay. I'm starting to like you almost as much as I like Bernie. senz Aug 2015 #48
Especially since he was one of the founding members of the CPC. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #8
They are scared. JDPriestly Aug 2015 #20
Mark Takano and Mike Honda are not cowards. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #25
Yes they are. short circuit Aug 2015 #31
You obviously have not the slightest clue. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #32
Vote at your own peril. short circuit Aug 2015 #33
Thanks, I take my right to vote seriously. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #35
Leader - whoops, I mean the FOUNDER... short circuit Aug 2015 #36
It's not like the CPC prefers HRC. Ken Burch Aug 2015 #65
What? Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #67
I wasn't saying they were sellouts Ken Burch Aug 2015 #68
I am guessing they disagree about the merits. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #69
No idea why the Congressional Progressive Caucus has not wendylaroux Aug 2015 #9
It's because they are Democrats, and Bernie isn't. LuvLoogie Aug 2015 #12
For the purpose of the Presidential ballot, Bernie *IS* a Democrat short circuit Aug 2015 #34
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #63
Bernie has never, ever won and then declined a Democratic nomination. Not once. Ken Burch Aug 2015 #72
I'd like to see a link, please... ms liberty Aug 2015 #37
Okay LuvLoogie Aug 2015 #61
Bullshit. Bernie has already made it clear he won't run third-party in the fall. Ken Burch Aug 2015 #71
i don't think he has asked or tried to get their endorsements JI7 Aug 2015 #13
Maybe he's waiting until after the first debate jfern Aug 2015 #18
why would he wait for the debates ? HIllary beat Obama at the debates but Obama got almost all JI7 Aug 2015 #19
Hillary beat Obama at the debates? tularetom Aug 2015 #21
+1 But now, she has a new weapon, JFK's signature hand gesture. merrily Aug 2015 #26
Hillary really got called out for being a warmonger jfern Aug 2015 #22
In 2008, many super delegates who had endorsed Hillary switched to Obama. merrily Aug 2015 #24
Obama is a life long Democrat. LuvLoogie Aug 2015 #64
No. it tells me Congress would rather be in status quo mode short circuit Aug 2015 #30
every single person I talk to is voting for Bernie. Voice for Peace Aug 2015 #17
I still can't believe Nixon won redstateblues Aug 2015 #29
And we don't want Nixon to win again. senz Aug 2015 #52
boo Voice for Peace Aug 2015 #60
Not the same thing. Ken Burch Aug 2015 #70
Bernie does not play well with others Gothmog Aug 2015 #27
Bernie does not play well because it's not a fucking game. frylock Aug 2015 #46
If you want to pass legislation, you need to work with other members of congress Gothmog Aug 2015 #55
Clinton and Sanders voted alike 93% of the time.. frylock Aug 2015 #56
Do you want to compare the number of her fellow members of congress who are endorsing her? Gothmog Aug 2015 #90
zero fucks given. frylock Aug 2015 #92
To reiterate.. frylock Aug 2015 #87
And yet Clinton got bills through Congress Gothmog Aug 2015 #89
And so did Sanders frylock Aug 2015 #93
No, it is the real world where the people who know Sanders best do not trust him or endorse him Gothmog Aug 2015 #82
Yeah, everyone in Congress knows what a great idea it is to cross the Clintons. frylock Aug 2015 #86
What is more important? Maedhros Aug 2015 #79
Your judgement of me is meaningless Gothmog Aug 2015 #81
It's meaningful. Maedhros Aug 2015 #85
You sound like you are supporting a candidate who does not get along with his co-workers Gothmog Aug 2015 #88
I'm supporting Sanders because his policies across the board Maedhros Aug 2015 #94
Given the approval rating of Congress.. it may be the best thing for Bernie. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #39
The approval rating for Congress is so low Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2015 #42
As an institution; their poll ratings are dismal, but the people can't elect Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #66
A group of people whose approval rating is in the teens at best? Who gives a FUCK who they endorse? cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #41
Needs an option for Kurska Aug 2015 #44
Release the Greenwald! frylock Aug 2015 #45
*HillCo tout their endorsements from the den of thieves aka Congress* whatchamacallit Aug 2015 #49
It's the NEW rightwing meme! Woo hoo! senz Aug 2015 #50
Well, we can trust congress to do what's best for the country....oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2015 #51
Irrelevant to me gollygee Aug 2015 #58
other: doesn't reflect poorly on Sanders who IS more progressive than Congress and does NOT reflect Attorney in Texas Aug 2015 #59
It proves that our system is broken and corrupted. HappyPlace Aug 2015 #62
It let's me know he isn't an insider and have made the right choice. mmonk Aug 2015 #76
Reflects poorly on Congress. in_cog_ni_to Aug 2015 #78
Should break down to the same as who supports who here. SouthernProgressive Aug 2015 #80
Not surprising from this "do nothing" congress. With Bernie as President they might actually have to Hiraeth Aug 2015 #91
 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
3. I've barely got internet access lately and am missing a great deal
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:57 AM
Aug 2015

is there some new non-news about Bernie?

AllyCat

(16,239 posts)
16. Long list of endorsements for another candidate
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:01 AM
Aug 2015

Former politicians, current ones, and LOTS of celebrities. Bernie just isn't as well liked in the popularity contest.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
74. There should be a name for the tactic of getting the first response to an OP
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 12:03 PM
Aug 2015

and leaving a turd and never coming back. Maybe "Drive-by dumping".

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
83. There is
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:22 PM
Aug 2015

"Nailed it in one."

More like a phrase, but it fits.

No need to come back to the thread at that point.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
95. I am glad you brought that up. For some the goal here is to have honest, decent
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 05:37 PM
Aug 2015

discussions, but for others the goal is apparently to "nail it". Not sure what that means, but it appears to mean dropping a turd and running, afraid to actually participate in the discussion. And they get extra credit if they can snag the #1 response. I guess it's what one does that can't discuss issues.

It the post is trying to deride Sen Sanders for wanting attention, I have to laugh. As an avid supporter, I hope to hell he is trying to get attention. As I am sure you've noticed, the more attention he gets, the more supporters he gets.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
96. Wrong
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 05:57 PM
Aug 2015

It the post is trying to deride Sen Sanders for wanting attention, I have to laugh. As an avid supporter, I hope to hell he is trying to get attention. As I am sure you've noticed, the more attention he gets, the more supporters he gets.


Seems you've missed the point. The OP (as well as the first post) wasn't about Sanders at all.

How about this post "discussing issues?"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=549169

Funny, I don't see you there wagging your finger.


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
97. The point of the OP was certainly about Sen Sanders, it even states his name in
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 09:01 PM
Aug 2015

the subject line.

I admit I had to guess what the point was from the response. So tell me what you think their point was if not to deride Sen Sanders for wanting attention.

I wasn't aware of the post you linked to but there are many, many threads discussing issues here without one single Clinton supporter participating.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
2. Reflects Corporate money is too afraid of him...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 01:56 AM
Aug 2015

... and will fund heavily those who will endorse Hillary now, and will make sure that others will pay the price if they do endorse him now. The extreme imbalance here makes this being the reason perfectly clear, and perfectly clear why we need to have him elected to help us get money OUT of politics!!!

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
38. They endorsed Obama
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:58 AM
Aug 2015

because they knew Obama was just as big a corporate shill as Hillary. The .001% didn't care which one of their picks "won." Either way, they'd get the same sweetheart deals, and you know what? They were right.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
40. But the meme is that "They want Bernie, but are afraid of the Clinton Machine". Obviously
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 12:03 PM
Aug 2015

that is not the case.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
77. I don't read it that way.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 02:48 PM
Aug 2015

I read it as "they are not on the side of working Americans, and Bernie is."

They don't want Bernie to win, because he will try and shut down the corporate money trough.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
84. Question ...
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:30 PM
Aug 2015
I read it as "they are not on the side of working Americans, and Bernie is."


If you really believe that ... why do you think Bernie will be able to get these same legislators to go along with his platform?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
53. Dealing with the enormous power of Big Money is not being a shill, any more than
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:31 PM
Aug 2015

working with gravity is. Every president has had to function within great limitations of executive power, and learns them extremely early, but whole books have been written about the ongoing dispersal of power in our era. For instance, a president often can only take steps to help other power blocks pulling the way he wants, and then hope they succeed.

As for Big Money, We the People are helping Big Money infiltrate and corrupt government at all levels. We can stop and undo the mess we have made of what our parents left us, as our grandparents did before that, but it will take time.

Ultimately, though, government corruption is ALL OUR FAULT.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
54. But Sanders has NOT even ONE congressional endorsment
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:44 PM
Aug 2015

Obama did. So, no fear of the "Clinton machine"

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
57. You mean fear of the Clinton machine that came from those 2008 Obama endorsements?
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 03:06 PM
Aug 2015

Time flows in one direction, you know.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
6. Why haven't members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus endorsed him?
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:06 AM
Aug 2015

They aren't exactly conservative Dems. Bernie should at least be able to pick up congressional endorsements from them.

Bernie has been in congress for nearly 25 years. If I held a job for nearly 25 years, I would expect some coworkers to provide recommendations if I seek a higher position.

So far Bernie can't even get a single letter of recommendation from his co-workers.

If even his liberal colleagues in Congress won't stick up for him, why should the American people vote for him? How can he get his agenda through Congress?

These are very fair questions.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
10. Every year the CPC releases their budget, DU collectively swoons
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:29 AM
Aug 2015

Now they're all bought off because they won't endorse Sanders?

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
8. Especially since he was one of the founding members of the CPC.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:23 AM
Aug 2015

To me, this is one of the most telling absences from the Sanders candidacy.

The left-wing of the Democratic Party is staying away from this.

Mike Honda and Mark Takano, two of my faves from the CPC from CA, have endorsed HRC.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
20. They are scared.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:40 AM
Aug 2015

If they had courage, the banks would not have been bailed out without a requirement that they in turn bail out homeowners.

Congress is terrified of change.

Where is the clawback that Nancy Pelosi talked about way back in 2008?

Never happened.

Congress is full of people who are at the same time attracted and frightened by corporate money.

They want to have access to the money themselves, and they are terrified that the money will be used to fund a candidate to run against them in their next election.

Bernie does not play that game.

They don't endorse Bernie for the same reason that they never manage to get enough votes to pass a bill or seriously work to get an amendment passed that would nullify CItizens United.

That's why they don't endorse Bernie. They think it is too risky.

 

short circuit

(145 posts)
31. Yes they are.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:27 AM
Aug 2015

If they were members of CPC, and respect the leader of it, then the endorsement should have been done. As such, Clinton's power holds all, and punishment for those who are disloyal to the Third Way and the Clinton Machine will be severe.

That, and the fact that Congress has one of the lowest approval ratings doesn't help the endorsers. Bernie netting zero endorsements from politiicans tells me he's the PERFECT candidate - clean, honest, a man with integrity, and ready to work for the people of America, not the corporations.

 

short circuit

(145 posts)
33. Vote at your own peril.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:36 AM
Aug 2015

I'd rather vote for Bernie to nullify Republican's power - he has that broad appeal - all political spectrum (Socialists, Greens, Republicans, Independent, Democrats, Liberterians, Communist, etc) to get people to vote for him - he is focusing on the issues that middle class America really needs. What exactly will Clinton be attracting? All I know is that anyone who votes with D next to their name (and yes, Bernie has that -D next to his name on his presidential ballot) will be voted no matter what.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
35. Thanks, I take my right to vote seriously.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:40 AM
Aug 2015

Pro-tip: Bernie isn't the leader of the CPC, just for your future reference. Grijalva and Ellison are the joint leadership.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
65. It's not like the CPC prefers HRC.
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 12:59 AM
Aug 2015

Most likely, they've been told that, if they endorse the Bern and HRC gets the nom, nothing they get passed will ever be signed(or, possibly, ever even get out of committee).

There were virtually no Congressional Dems supporting RFK or any other possible "Dump Johnson" candidate at this point in 1967, either.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
67. What?
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 01:47 AM
Aug 2015

Please, if you are going to opine, it always helps to have something to base it on.

If you are going to say you thing the most progressive Dems in Congress are just establishment sell-outs, you should just say it, like the others. But frankly, I am weary of posters who think Hillary wouldn't work with her allies in Congress, no matter who they endorse. That's hardly the history of her political work with the President and his allies after his election.

But you know what? Believe what you want.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
68. I wasn't saying they were sellouts
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 02:08 AM
Aug 2015

I was saying they could be afraid of LBJ-style payback.

It's not like they've endorsed HRC as a caucus, either.

And there is no good reason, on the merits for the CPC to actually prefer the less-progressive candidate-especially with the polls now showing Bernie to be just as electable as HRC.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
69. I am guessing they disagree about the merits.
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 02:27 AM
Aug 2015

At this time, Bernie has garnered no endorsements from his peers in office. And there is no poll that shows Bernie as electable as Hillary.

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
9. No idea why the Congressional Progressive Caucus has not
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:24 AM
Aug 2015

endorsed him.Just as long as ordinary citizens keep endorsing him,in higher numbers every week.

LuvLoogie

(7,061 posts)
12. It's because they are Democrats, and Bernie isn't.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:39 AM
Aug 2015

That's all it is, really. This is for the Presidency, and the Democratic nominee should be a Democrat.

Bernie might win the primaries because the DNC allowed him a stake, but he is outside the party structure--though using it. His MO is to run as a Democrat and decline the nomination if he wins it. Then he runs as an Independent.

The DNC welcomes him because that is the stronger position to take. It holds Bernie to his honor. They do not require his registration as a Democrat because that has to come from him.

It is very telling to the Democratic caucus that Bernie has not become a Democrat. And so, he has no Democratic endorsements.

 

short circuit

(145 posts)
34. For the purpose of the Presidential ballot, Bernie *IS* a Democrat
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:37 AM
Aug 2015

until then, he remains an Independent Senator from Vermont.

Response to short circuit (Reply #34)

ms liberty

(8,614 posts)
37. I'd like to see a link, please...
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:49 AM
Aug 2015

To the evidence that Bernie has ever run for public office as a Democrat, won the nomination, declined the nomination in order to run for that office as an independent, and as you accuse him by saying it is his MO, please also provide the links to show where he has done it repeatedly.

LuvLoogie

(7,061 posts)
61. Okay
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 08:08 PM
Aug 2015
http://www.thenation.com/article/why-bernie-sanders-says-dont-underestimate-me/


Sanders played a critical role in forging Vermont’s progressive reputation as an outsider candidate who beat incumbents, won statewide races when Republicans were taking the other top jobs, and upset partisan patterns that once seemed to be locked in stone. He has done so by audaciously challenging both major parties—defeating a Democratic mayor of Burlington in his first winning race and defeating a Republican congressman a little less than a decade later. Sanders has won Democratic primaries several times and then refused the nomination in order to pursue a November run as an independent. Now he seeks to win Democratic presidential primaries in a race with front-runner Hillary Clinton.<<
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
71. Bullshit. Bernie has already made it clear he won't run third-party in the fall.
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 03:05 AM
Aug 2015

He's always been the anti-Nader.

JI7

(89,281 posts)
13. i don't think he has asked or tried to get their endorsements
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:54 AM
Aug 2015

you even see joe biden trying to see if he can get elizabeth warren and other support. but there is nothing to show that sanders has even tried or simply asked.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
18. Maybe he's waiting until after the first debate
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:29 AM
Aug 2015

Of course that's really really late this year as part of the DNC's Clinton frontrunner protection plan.

JI7

(89,281 posts)
19. why would he wait for the debates ? HIllary beat Obama at the debates but Obama got almost all
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:33 AM
Aug 2015

Senators endorsing him.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
21. Hillary beat Obama at the debates?
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:07 AM
Aug 2015


We must have been watching different debates, in the ones I saw he pretty much wiped the floor with her.

Except for one sarcastic remark he made about her "likeabilty" which came back to bite him in the ass

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. +1 But now, she has a new weapon, JFK's signature hand gesture.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 08:04 AM
Aug 2015

Hey, if it worked for JFK, Bill Clinton and Darrell Hammond, why not?

Clinton thumb. The gesture dubbed the "Clinton thumb" after one of its most famous users, Bill Clinton, is used by politicians to provide emphasis in speeches. This gesture has the thumb leaning against the thumb-side portion of the index finger, which is part of a closed fist, or slightly projecting from the fist. An emphatic, it does not exhibit the anger of the clenched fist or pointing finger, and so is thought to be less threatening.[12] This gesture was likely adopted by Clinton from John F. Kennedy, who can be seen using it in many speeches and images from his political career.[12]




Jerry Weissman also wrote about Bill's likely having "borrowed" this gesture from JFK in his book, The Power Presenter). JFK had used it liberally during his inaugural speech.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
22. Hillary really got called out for being a warmonger
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 06:09 AM
Aug 2015

for voting for Kyl-Lieberman. Although that was by Gravel.

 

short circuit

(145 posts)
30. No. it tells me Congress would rather be in status quo mode
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:23 AM
Aug 2015

than to be ready for a change.

If Bernie's in, then there WILL be a change in Congress, beyond gerrymandering holds.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
17. every single person I talk to is voting for Bernie.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 04:26 AM
Aug 2015

kids are registering democratic to vote for him.
this can only get better, as they have nothing better to do
than get their friends fired up too. I'm seeing this in many
places, on many faces. I mention Bernie's name in a public
restaurant, people's ears perk up, they smile, they thumbsup.

Most who listen to Bernie could care less about the stiffs in congress. I think what's being most underestimated is his appeal to intelligent thoughtful realistic conservatives. I know many of them too. Pretty sure they want to keep Hillary out of the white house, and this Sanders guy has been Independent for TWENTYFIVEYEARS

whattarascall


whattasmile

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
70. Not the same thing.
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 03:03 AM
Aug 2015

And it's not as if it was obvious from the start that McGovern would lose...or that there was any better possible candidae in '72 once Muskie was smeared and Teddy destroyed himself at Chappaquiddick. Humphrey and Scoop Jackson were unacceptable.

Besides, that was just Pauline Kael who said that line...not McGovern's campaign staff.

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
27. Bernie does not play well with others
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 08:42 AM
Aug 2015

Bernie has past very few bills and his fellow members of congress know him best

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
55. If you want to pass legislation, you need to work with other members of congress
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:51 PM
Aug 2015

Sanders has not passed any significant signature legislation and yet he is can be POTUS???

frylock

(34,825 posts)
56. Clinton and Sanders voted alike 93% of the time..
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:56 PM
Aug 2015

surely, you're not suggesting that Secretary Clinton doesn't play well with others?

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
90. Do you want to compare the number of her fellow members of congress who are endorsing her?
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 04:32 PM
Aug 2015

Do you really want to make this comparison??

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
82. No, it is the real world where the people who know Sanders best do not trust him or endorse him
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:15 PM
Aug 2015

In the real world, you would expect a candidate to be endorsed by the people who work with him or who know him. None of Sanders' fellow members of Congress will endorse him. That is meaningful when you are trying to decide if the person is viable or will make a good POTUS.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
86. Yeah, everyone in Congress knows what a great idea it is to cross the Clintons.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 04:07 PM
Aug 2015

blahblahblah real world blahblah.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
79. What is more important?
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 02:51 PM
Aug 2015

"Playing well with others" who are selling us down the river to Wall Street? Or standing up to Wall Street?

How you answer determines if you're Third Way or Progressive.

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
81. Your judgement of me is meaningless
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:13 PM
Aug 2015

The fact that Sanders can not find one member of congress to endorse him is meaningful in the real world

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
85. It's meaningful.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:31 PM
Aug 2015

I just don't think the endorsement of Congresspersons is an indicator of the better candidate.

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
88. You sound like you are supporting a candidate who does not get along with his co-workers
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 04:30 PM
Aug 2015

How will your candidate get anything through congress? His record on getting major bills through congress is really bad

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
94. I'm supporting Sanders because his policies across the board
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 05:01 PM
Aug 2015

are consistent with my progressive values. I have every confidence that he will follow through on his campaign promises, and if Congressional Democrats don't fall in behind him then we will know them for what they will have demonstrated themselves to be: corporate shills.

Your solution is to elect the corporate shill, so that she can work more effectively with others of her kind. I don't much care for that solution.



Uncle Joe

(58,468 posts)
66. As an institution; their poll ratings are dismal, but the people can't elect
Mon Aug 24, 2015, 01:25 AM
Aug 2015

or make decisions on the entire Congress, just their own Senators and Representatives, which of course only make up a small piece of the puzzle.

Everybody is in their own fishbowl and the pathetic regard for the Congress is a reflection of this division.

The string pullers and powers behind the curtain have it worked out to a fine art, keep the people distracted over inane B.S. and the Congress is weakened as a result.

That's why the conglomerated corporate media; as an institution is loath to keep substantive issues front and center, they're too afraid of the American People waking up, smelling the coffee and becoming united against their mega-corporate/oligarch owners.



 

senz

(11,945 posts)
50. It's the NEW rightwing meme! Woo hoo!
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:15 PM
Aug 2015

What it tells us is this: fear (in addition to money) still rules the U.S. legislature.

But Bernie's working on that. Stay tuned.


 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
51. Well, we can trust congress to do what's best for the country....oh, wait.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 02:18 PM
Aug 2015
"I think I can say, and say with pride, that we have some legislatures that bring in higher prices than any in the world."

"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."


Mark Twain

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
58. Irrelevant to me
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 03:10 PM
Aug 2015

I choose how to vote based on my own beliefs, feelings, opinions. Not those of members of Congress.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
59. other: doesn't reflect poorly on Sanders who IS more progressive than Congress and does NOT reflect
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 03:24 PM
Aug 2015

the status quo so it is completely unsurprising that Sanders would not get their endorsements, and this unsurprising fact doesn't reflect poorly on Congress because they naturally would endorse Clinton who more accurately reflects their views.

The primary race is simple:

if you like the status quo and you would be happy with a third Obama term, Clinton is your candidate (and this generally describes the Democrats in Congress);

if you want something more progressive than the status quo and feel that Obama was more centrist that you had hoped he would be on trade and foreign policy and corporate regulation (including energy and banking), Sanders is your candidate.

 

HappyPlace

(568 posts)
62. It proves that our system is broken and corrupted.
Sun Aug 23, 2015, 09:20 PM
Aug 2015

We had this problem 8 years ago, too.

Some changed their minds, like Donna Brazile, but endorsing too early, before even one debate, means you don't respect the voters' right to choose and shows you want to curry favor with the candidate.

Screw that.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
78. Reflects poorly on Congress.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 02:49 PM
Aug 2015

There's a reason Congress' approval ratings hover between 11%-14%. The country despises them. And rightly so!

 

SouthernProgressive

(1,810 posts)
80. Should break down to the same as who supports who here.
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 02:52 PM
Aug 2015

Seems like a thought experiment based in anything but thought.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
91. Not surprising from this "do nothing" congress. With Bernie as President they might actually have to
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 04:39 PM
Aug 2015

work for living.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Poll: Bernie's lack of Co...