2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCornel West Backs Bernie Sanders
"On a CNN segment, scholar and activist Cornel West was asked "who would be the best candidate for minority voters?" and he replied, "no doubt...Brother Bernie Sanders."
"West said his confidence stemmed from how Bernie Sanders "talks about Wall Street," which was likely a reference to how tough the Vermont Senator has promised to be on big banks and investment firms. During the the housing crisis, many banks specifically targeted blacks for the worst possible loans."
The rest is here: https://suite.io/jared-plotkin/6qwb2yr
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Cornell's identification with Bernie Sanders shows the connection to the ideas of equality and representing everyone, which is the entire Sanders campaign.
I keep seeing remarks here as it that's something the Clinton campaign wouldn't welcome.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)These two men never have put themselves out to
run for office: but have a lot to say about other who do.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)n/t
ericson00
(2,707 posts)and I think we have just a few good names
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)she has all those people? even my favorite stars?
Dayummmm....your team has all the popular kids!! lucky!
I'll be on the side of the people who don't take limos.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And I find it hysterically funny that Joe Lieberman endorsed the Confederate candidate.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Sanders is not a Dem: I want to vote for a real Dem, Hillary!
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)what it's supposed to stand for. This party is supposed to be anti-imperialist, uncompromisingl anti-racist, pro-human need and dignity against corporate greed.
HRC helped build the DLC...a group that has done nothing but bashing the Democratic Party(by pushing it to adopt Republican military policies and economically segregationist and economic royalist trade and fiscal policies.
Cha
(297,277 posts)with the President for 8 years..
"Cornel West v. Barack Obama" by Melissa Harris Perry
"Professor West says that Obama has a certain fear of free black men. But this is a pissing matchnot prophetic witness."
snip//
West begins with a bit of historical revision. West suggests that the president discarded him without provocation after he offered the Obama for America campaign his loyal service and prayers. But anyone with a casual knowledge of this rift knows it began during the Democratic primary, not after the election. It began, not with a puffed-up president but when Cornel Wests dear brother Tavis Smiley threw a public tantrum because Senator Obama refused to attend Smileys annual State of Black America. Smiley repeatedly suggested that his forum was the necessary black vetting space for the Democratic nominees. He needed to ask Obama and Clinton tough questions so that black America could get the answers it needed. But black America was doing a fine job making up its own mind in the primaries and didnt need Smileys blessing to determine their own electoral preferences. Indeed, when Smiley got a chance to hold candidate Clinton accountable he spent more time fawning over her than probing about her symbolic or substantive policy stances that impacted black communities. Fiercely loyal to his friend, Professor West chose sides and began to undermine candidate Obama is small and large ways. Candidate Obama ceased calling West back because he was in the middle of a fierce campaign and Wests loyalties were, at best, divided. I suspect candidate Obama did not trust his dear brother to keep the campaign secrets and strategies. I also suspect he was not inaccurate in his hesitancy.
West may have had principled, even prophetic reasons, for choosing this outsider position relative to Obama, but it is dishonest to later frame that choice as a betrayal on the part of the president. After what I had written about Senator Clinton during the campaign I wasnt expecting an offer from the State Department.
Much more..
http://www.thenation.com/article/cornel-west-v-barack-obama/
Yeah, we'll see if BS is as enthused about Cornel as some of his supporters.
I'd love to see that.. BS & Cornel VS President Obama. I'm thinking the candidate who wins the Dem Nom will want to have the Obama Coalition to help them win the Presidency.. not someone who's been pissing on him for years even before the Inauguration.. like Cornel.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)you may not agree which is ok. just my feelings
MADem
(135,425 posts)That's an endorsement that comes with more than a little baggage....
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Some of the things Cornel has said about Obama:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026899166
Rockefeller Republican in blackface.
brown-faced Clinton.
"Kenny G in brown skin.
"a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs"
"a black puppet of corporate plutocrats."
"a niggerized black person."
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Hillary does not need this clown endorsing her and neither does O'Malley
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)This place has gone off the deep end.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Deep end is an understatement.
Lisa D
(1,532 posts)On Wed Aug 19, 2015, 03:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
No, no! Let Bernie keep him.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=531415
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
The term "clown" for a long time left wing activist is quite disruptive and rude. He's no Republican.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Aug 19, 2015, 03:39 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You have got to be kidding. It's an opinion and people can call anyone names. This is alert stalking. West is certainly not a protected person and he is a divisive figure at that.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Someone's opinion of a person who does not shy from controversy, should not be shut down. I support Bernie Sanders and think highly of Cornel West, therefore I don't like the comment, but that is not a good reason to disappear it.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I have no objection to the classification.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not over the top
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I was stalked, and bullied and brought this to management. They decided, since i am to the left of the democratic party, that I was a rightful victim. So at this point I just smile. Those birdies are coming home. Yes, it is real, but it is not a bug, it's a feature.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Too many people here alert on anything just to see if they hit bingo.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And I know that once a certain thing rears it's ugly head, I am out of here. Permanently.
My return was accompanied by heavy dose of walking on egg shells and avoiding actual substantive discussions.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Breaks really work.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)with your new claim "They decided, since i am to the left of the democratic party, that I was a rightful victim." (BTW, nice way to take a hit at the DU owners while playing the victim card at the same time).
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)putting you on ignore does not work either. It did not work back then, it will not work now, so you are never, ever going on ignore.
So enjoy the birdies, as they chirp, chirp, chirp. Careful, they can be nasty and beak you too. In fact, I hope you get a few "fans" that will not just beak you, but beak you hard. (And since I am sure you will need a translation, birds do not byte, they beak)
These days though, after reading into the pathology, I truly feel sorry for people like you. But I do hope you get a nice dose of your own medicine. A full and nasty and bitter dose.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)you know what is harsh? When bullies are allowed to take over a place and chase away people, which they have done effectively over the years. You know what is harsh? When actual discussion has been actually killed, because of them.
You know what is harsh? When the cyberstalking got to the point that I have to moderate Reporting San Diego manually, since more than a few DU'ers are IP banned, they continued their cyberstalking there.
You know what is harsh? When you are no longer wiling to post material here, because of the bullies. That is what is harsh. You know what is even more harsh? I left the party primarily due to the health care vote. I live in a state where that makes no difference, but it was a signal. I will not re-register democratic because of Democratic Underground and the bullies. That is what is harsh.
And I know that this is not a bug, but a feature.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)get away with a nasty personal attack, right? And a weird gross threat about birds pecking.
I like you, but that shit was OTT.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)He has engaged in more personal attacks than you care to imagine. Most of them were allowed to stand...
By the way, birds coming home to roost is an American colloquialism. Me wishing a bully to be bullied is the only way, sometimes, that bullies get it. It is part of a now well understood pathology among adults (and children). You have no idea how much I feel sorry for them. To the point of empathy. These are people in deep pain. But that does not mean he (and his pals) have not caused a lot of pain to me and others. Many of the others were simply chased away. I am a glutton for punishment I guess, or simply too stubborn to let them win.
As I said, becuase of them I have to hand moderate a site. Every so often they try their bullshit... and they get banned all over again. Yup, they use socks. They even have tried to attack my readers... and they have yet to get any of their attacks through... but trust me, it takes far more work to keep that site SAFE FROM BULLIES, than it should.
I asked a few times that the owners do that here. They make the place safe. Their answers and behavior tells me that they prefer to have the bullies do the dirty work of chasing people they do not particularly like away. It is not a bug, it's a feature.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it really is not.
They helped to create the environment... now that environment here on Democratic Underground is so toxic that many of us literally walk on eggshells when on this site.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)any way you slice it, it's very rude.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)that he needs a dose of his own medicine, not a spoonful. I will not take it back. I hope he does get a few fans that bully him. Maybe then he will stop doing it to anybody else.
Once you understand the behavior, you also understand that he will find a new mark, once the old mark stops giving a shit about it.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)perpetual victim. I've had my share of "fans" over the last 14 years; I won't act persecuted because of what somebody on a message board says.
you seem to think that when you post fantastical, absurd things (9 feet of hail falling on mexico, a broken wind turbine blade flying for a mile in the air, to name a few), and get corrected on it, that you are being bullied. that's too bad.
one might think that having reality pointed out to you by dozens of posters over the years might give you a reason for even the slightest of self-reflection. unfortunately, this is not the case. best of luck to you.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but also bullies justify their behavior every day of the week and twice every day actually.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)for example, you posted claims that 9 feet of hail fell on mexico during a thunderstorm, when in fact, a deep pile of hail had collected from a wide area at the bottom of a steep hill due to run-off...
if you had several DUers point out to you that 3 meters of hail, did not in fact fall on the area, but that the resulting pile of hail was the run-off from a much larger area, would you perhaps correct your claim, or, would you double down on it, and then call the people correcting you some nefarious gang of bullies?
I believe I went so far as to use the most simplistic analogy possible to explain the issue; pour a container of bb's on a flat plate, and measure it's depth, and then pour the bb's into a small bowl, and measure the depth. but that was perceived as some sort of ruthless attack.
while the exasperation of watching nadin double down on claims like this over the years has led me to lose patience and act less than polite at times (which I will readily admit), to this day I am fascinated how stories like this get portrayed as some kind of relentless gang-bullying. I have never seen somebody take the victimhood tactic to this level, or to take an internet message board as personally, as she has. The hypocrisy can be amazing, as nadin seems to sincerely wish me some sort of misery, despite playing the defenseless victim.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but hey, I expect that from bullies, How it went from 3 feet to 9 must be your defective memory. And yes, they took all night to remove a few tons of ice from a bridge due to a lack of equipment. I mean, Mexico does not expect that kind of weather, but hell, I am sure next you will also tell me that the head of the Mexican NWS did not appear on TV to explain what happened. It was rather educational. I wish more scientists were on my TV here in the states.
I also suspect that some of your post on this is actually racism. I mean why would Mexican networks know how to report the news that happens in their city?
Nope, you ain't gonna go on ignore ever.
And if you are so exasperated, why not save yourself the tummy ache and just put me on ignore? Nope, that is not what bullies do.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)accusations and store them somewhere useful, perhaps next to the lumber pile for your daily crosses.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)sorry.
It was a meter or so... up to the knee of the reporter.
They did refer to that as looking like Chicago too, which I found kind of cute.
And using crosses with a Jew is kind of crude, but expected. I mean it is what it is.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)there is a rule about holes...
But in your case... here you go
Please proceed to continue having that non conversation with yourself. I am sure you can keep entertaining yourself. Bullies though hate it when the mark, that be me here, just feel extremely sorry for them, and really do not care about the bullying behavior.
At this time I find it sad... predictable, and entertaining... but I have some reading to do. You know real work. And you are truly a waste of my time at this point.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)you are, as a reporter and historian, surely you're aware that the term "climb down from your cross, we could use the wood", is part of the language evolution you spoke of when defending the term "political whore".
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and my dad was a holocaust survivor, I guess 2+2 = 3
As to attention, that is what you want... you got it.
Now please entertain yourself
dionysus
(26,467 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)strange fetish
dionysus
(26,467 posts)how ironic.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it is now well understood.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)but I guess that's just more bullying...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)they are cute... it fits... just replace grammar with spelling
and this applies too
dionysus
(26,467 posts)think there is some kind of argument, let alone one to be won.
have a nice evening nadin.
George II
(67,782 posts)DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)about it.
After an alert was declined and the post stayed, there were posts all over the place from Sanders supporters defining, redefining, and justifying calling Hillary Clinton a whore. And the doubling down, sarcastic cackling that went on was appalling.
It was one of the most disgusting displays I've seen here on DU in my ten years of membership.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)that's disgusting.
George II
(67,782 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)just two words,
"F#c/< Y*u!"
My response got hidden. It was worth it.
Cha
(297,277 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)the use of the term "political whore" as an "evolution of language", as if the rest of DU was too stupid to understand the concept.
I don't recall "posts from all over the place", though. just one lame thread.
I recall the main gist was that some people were claiming that since "political whore" had often been applied to GOP and also men on DU in the past, that it is a-ok to use against Hillary.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)I did not defend the use, I stated that it is becoming part of political speech, which it is.
and you are not arguing with anybody but yourself.
There is no arguing with you. There is no intelligent conversation either.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)ok to use against Hillary. you were quite clear in your pontificating. but you were looking at it scientifically through the prism of language evolution... not trying to curry favor with anyone, suuuure. you defended it's use up and down a thread trying to play professor.
BTW, your passive aggressive attempts at insults entertain me.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)why there is no conversations with you... but it is what it is.
You have an agenda... and it is kind of cute... not in a good way, but cute. And passive aggressive is what you have done with me for close to two decades now. That projection is just lovely.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)message board, people will take note and respond accordingly.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And you have a reputation as a well, bully in some quarters.
By the way I do not pretend to be anything more than a local reporter covering local POLICY issues, and at times have some fascinating POLICY discussions with locals over coffee... sadly at one point we used to talk policy HERE. I think part of the agenda is to stop that from happening any longer.
So pat yourself on the back. In that sense, sadly, you have succeeded.
George II
(67,782 posts)...you apparently have been here since 2003 (12 years) and your foil has been here since the site's inception, 2001 (14 years)
"Close to two decades now" would be maybe 17 or 18 years?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Have a good one...
(and yes, it feels that long)
George II
(67,782 posts)....a Wall Street whore (or similar)
It was alerted and allowed to stand. That prompted a few arrogant OPs defining "whore" and justifying its use, particularly with respect to Clinton.
RichVRichV
(885 posts)I've served on juries for frivolous alerts on Hillary supports. I've served on juries for frivolous alerts on Bernie supporters. I've served on juries that didn't have to do with either one. So far I haven't had a valid ToS violation to vote to hide on any of them.
The simple fact is anytime you have disagreements on this site you have a certain percentage of people trying to silence those that disagree with them. The phenomenon isn't limited just to Hillary supporters.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but that is because management has allowed alert stalking and bullying. It is not a bug, it's a feature. They allowed it to flourish, so the site is far less than it once was. There is a shit load of stuff I will NOT post here, for example. It has to do with policy and analysis. And it has all to do with the bullies that run FREE, I tell you.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... but the fact is that 85% of DUers are Bernie supporters (according to Skinner).
Therefore, if an equal percentage of HRC and BS supporting jurors vote to hide posts based on what they see as smears against their preferred candidate, you are going to have more Hillary supporters being silenced.
It's just one more reason why the jury system doesn't work - as though more proof were needed.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and i mean this is not a bug, this is a feature. SO much crap has been allowed to go on over the years, that now it is coming home and that is that.
By the way, I agree, the jury system is flawed, the alert system is flawed, I do not play either.
mcar
(42,334 posts)Cha
(297,277 posts)Thank you, Lisa D
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)but it is not disruptive. i do not like West and really that's an understatement but I mostly ignore him like so many in the AA community.
still_one
(92,216 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:47 AM - Edit history (1)
is how he refers to himself
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)still_one
(92,216 posts)West has described himself as a "non-Marxist socialist" (partly because he cannot reconcile Marxism with Christianity)[56] and serves as honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, which he has described as "the first multiracial, socialist organization close enough to my politics that I could join".[21] He also described himself as a "radical democrat, suspicious of all forms of authority" on the Matrix-themed documentary The Burly Man Chronicles.[57]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornel_West
I am going to edit the link to correct my inaccuracy, but my characterization of him as a Marxist was not correct.
Thanks for pointing that out, appreciate it
Cha
(297,277 posts)blackface. "a niggerized black person." "a niggerized black person." brown-faced Clinton. "Kenny G in brown skin. "a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs" a black puppet of corporate plutocrats.".. A Clown!
I'd call him much worse but then I'd get an alert, wouldn't I. They don't want their precious little cornel disparaged. he does such a good job of hating on Obama.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Cha
(297,277 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Give me a break with that already. I think it's a great choice. I have met Cornel, and he's a good guy. I have listened to many of his speeches, read a couple of his books, and I can't say that I disagree with him. He's been around the movement for a very long time too. If we want a revolution, we need more revolutionaries like him.
840high
(17,196 posts)AppalachianLeftist
(40 posts)the man who suggested that Obama should smoke crack.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Just ignore it.
Cha
(297,277 posts)snip//
West begins with a bit of historical revision. West suggests that the president discarded him without provocation after he offered the Obama for America campaign his loyal service and prayers. But anyone with a casual knowledge of this rift knows it began during the Democratic primary, not after the election. It began, not with a puffed-up president but when Cornel Wests dear brother Tavis Smiley threw a public tantrum because Senator Obama refused to attend Smileys annual State of Black America. Smiley repeatedly suggested that his forum was the necessary black vetting space for the Democratic nominees. He needed to ask Obama and Clinton tough questions so that black America could get the answers it needed. But black America was doing a fine job making up its own mind in the primaries and didnt need Smileys blessing to determine their own electoral preferences. Indeed, when Smiley got a chance to hold candidate Clinton accountable he spent more time fawning over her than probing about her symbolic or substantive policy stances that impacted black communities. Fiercely loyal to his friend, Professor West chose sides and began to undermine candidate Obama is small and large ways. Candidate Obama ceased calling West back because he was in the middle of a fierce campaign and Wests loyalties were, at best, divided. I suspect candidate Obama did not trust his dear brother to keep the campaign secrets and strategies. I also suspect he was not inaccurate in his hesitancy.
West may have had principled, even prophetic reasons, for choosing this outsider position relative to Obama, but it is dishonest to later frame that choice as a betrayal on the part of the president. After what I had written about Senator Clinton during the campaign I wasnt expecting an offer from the State Department.
Much more..
http://www.thenation.com/article/cornel-west-v-barack-obama/
Yeah, we'll see if BS is as enthused about Cornel as some of his supporters.
I'd love to see that.. BS & Cornel VS President Obama. I'm thinking the candidate who wins the Dem Nom will want to have the Obama Coalition to help them win the Presidency.. not someone who's been pissing on him for years even before the Inauguration.. like Cornel.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And let's face it ... the loudest and angriest of the Bernie supporters on DU are the same folks who have attacked President Obama, and incorrectly predicted disaster after disaster for the last 6 years.
If folks like them become recognized as representing Bernie's base ... Bernie will have zero chance of gaining supporters from Obama's coalition.
These aren't the most politically astute folks we're talking about.
Cha
(297,277 posts)continue to be.. dissing our popular, accomplished President Obama.
The country isn't DU, thank Goodness.. the country appreciates him. Half of it anyway.. the other half is brainwashed by rwinger propaganda.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Tavis Smiley. And I'm being very kind. I don't think anyone will hold it against Bernie. ButiIf Bernie puts West on his policy team, the first question from newsmedia will be whether Bernie agrees with the above list of names West has called PBO over the years. Bernie's team can see that one coming.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)We have way too much sense.
If Sanders had any sense at all, he'd run like hell from Corny just like we have done.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Activendemocracy
(5 posts)There will be a time when President Obama will have to ask himself if his "legacy" was valid or a farce...
The Bush era tax cuts extentsions....
No jailed Wall Street executives....
TPP AKA SHAFTA....
Claiming climate change is real then give Royal Dutch Shell carte blanche to drill in the Arctic
Also you can add Eric Holder to the list as well...sellout
TBC....
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)There will be a time when President Obama will have to ask himself if his "legacy" was valid or a farce... - not sure what this means
The Bush era tax cuts extentsions.... this was probably horsetrading which presidents have to do. When Bernie was asked why he was running as a Democrat, he told his audience that he had to deal with the realities of what is. If he wanted to run successfully, he needed the infrastructure of the Dem primaries and caucuses. Was he selling out or being practical?
No jailed Wall Street executives.... I didn't want them jailed. I wanted all the money and more if they do it again.
TPP AKA SHAFTA.... this deal does not threaten American jobs because the new jobs are in technology and Americans don't have the education or skills to do them. We are an anti-intellectual society. We seem to cherish our ignorance and stupidity. This is wny they have to import workers from the middle and far east to work in those jobs. Currently there are over 3 millions jobs in the US that cannot be filled byAmerican workers. THat's on us. And no matter how many times President Obama tries to explain this, we just don't get it. This is why he wants to make the first two years of college free so we can get up to speed. But again we are just too stupid to get it.
Claiming climate change is real then give Royal Dutch Shell carte blanche to drill in the Arctic - I don't believe they're up there drilling for oil. Russia is also up there and I don't think they're drilling for oil either.
Also you can add Eric Holder to the list as well...sellout - AG Holder got the best deals because he got the money, which I hope went to the people who lost so much. He also did a great job on the BP oil spill. I cannot wait for his book to come out so out the trash he had to deal with.
But the bottom line is we are the problem - we the consumers. We want change but we have to change our consuming behavior. We keep consuming stuff we don't need. we have to change.
Cherry Creek Native
(55 posts)in IT.
TPP needs to cease to exist in everyone's mind - buried in a long pile of bad ideas.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Americans don't have the education or skills to get the STEM jobs available insult your career choice?
demwing
(16,916 posts)youve got ODS - Obama Deflection Syndrome
Response to underthematrix (Reply #71)
Name removed Message auto-removed
George II
(67,782 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)It's sad because he's a brilliant man who was not so long ago a leading public intellectual. And then he went off the rails.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)The are a team!
Cha
(297,277 posts)BS can have him. Millions of people support President Obama.. and the Democratic Candidate, who I hope will be Hillary, will be having Obama campaign for them and with them.
Thanks for the list of ignorant racist slurs cornel west has thrown at the President, Cali. He's said some bullshite about First Lady Michelle Obama, too. I don't want him anywhere near my candidate.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I doubt Hillary would want his endorsement.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)That is very hateful.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)being outspoken enough on race issues
Look, you cant talk about wealth inequality, you cant talk about decrepit education, you cant talk about massive unemployment and underemployment, and you cant talk about drones being dropped on people in other parts of the world without talking about white supremacy, and its ways in which it operates, he said.
It doesnt have to be overt, the president is right about that, West continued. But too many black people are niggerized. I would say the first black president has become the first niggerized black president.
What do you mean by that? asked dismayed host Poppy Harlow.
A niggerized black person is a black person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy, West responded. We know hes president of all America, but white supremacy is as American as cherry pie! Were talking about moral issues, spiritual issues!
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cornel-west-on-cnn-obama-is-americas-first-nggerized-president/
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I recently watched a West Youtube vid where he went on and on about how much of the black leadership in this country has sold out to corporate interests, and in my opinion he was and is right on. Proud to have his rec of Bernie.
druidity33
(6,446 posts)but so is calling a group of liberal supporters "liberal white supremacists". I think i would've been alerted on had i called Marissa at the BLM protests a clown. In fact i was told i didn't know what i was talking about (because i questioned their tactics and target) and that i needed to listen and shut up. I've never been a huge fan of Cornel West, but he is a fairly well respected Academic.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)He acts like its cool to say very ugly thing about Obama,
along with Tavis
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Spazito
(50,357 posts)and not in a good way.
still_one
(92,216 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 20, 2015, 09:03 AM - Edit history (2)
the words he uses to express that disrespect are extremely bad taste. He also used such vitriol against Dysan, and others in the African American community, and for someone who describes himself as a non-Marksist socialist who is a Christian, he sure seems to have a lot of aggression against folks who do not agree with him
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Anything taken out of context will sound awful. As if everything Obama has said were holy.
I've met Professor West and I find him to be much more liberal than Obama has been. He is an honest caring man.
Funny how those RepubliCON insults and talking points against Professor West always get posted by the same people over and over again here on DU.
Divide and conquer anyone?
840high
(17,196 posts)still_one
(92,216 posts)I see it. You enjoy the pontification of Dr West that is your right, but unlike you I made no personal attack against you or Dr West as you did me, which you are also welcome to do. I simply expressed my opinion about a public figure. Dr West refers to himself as a non-Marksist socialist who believes in God. That is what he identifies with, not me.
I am impressed you met with Dr West, what does that mean? I never said he didn't care about the issues, I criticized the way he denigrated anyone who doesn't agree with him, and I named several people, not just President Obama
You talk about divide and conquer, because I post something critical of Dr West. you don't know what you are talking about.
What am I trying to divide and conquer, because I have no idea what you are talking about?
Enjoy your day
mythology
(9,527 posts)But also Cornel West sits in his safe peanut gallery seat and tosses insults. He never has to actually get anything done, so he can afford to say he'd never compromise because that's a position he will never be in.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)calling the POTUS those names. That is patently unfair and a mischaracterization of his work of the last 6+ years. Cornel West IS NOT all that.....fair either. But he is in love with himself so I would expect shit like this from him and now you.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)And if it wasnt for that blunt reaction to President Barack Obama after his 18-minute valediction to Trayvon Martin, Wests talk-radio partner, Tavis Smiley, might have taken the prize when he declared the speech as weak as pre-sweetened Kool-Aid, via tweet.
snip
Just like when West says civil rights leaders are on the Obama plantation, hes sharing his script with former Congressman Allen Westthe firebrand black Republican who once said that hed lead black voters off of the Democrats 21st century plantation. Or the time Dr. West remarked that Obama was scared of free black men, which sounded a lot like fast-food executive Herman Cains assessment that Obama isnt a real black man.
I could go on, but I wont.
The point isnt that Smiley and West shouldnt speak their mindsthey should. But if they want us to take them seriously, then theyd be well-advised to come up with something better than one-liners and pot-shots.
More http://thegrio.com/2013/07/23/cornel-west-tavis-smiley-criticism-of-president-obama-devolves-into-pot-shots/
Excuse my language, Ef them both. Bernie can have them.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)So it looks like some black people are more black than others.
Is that the idea?
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)Read up on them. You love them, then they are all yours.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)What's your actual PROBLEM with black people criticising Obama?
I gave them their 'props' at one time. Now, I do not respect them as 'leaders' in any respect. I respect them for their academic and professional accomplishments and for surviving as POC....all respect ends there with me. Bernie deserves them......
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)That not all AA love POTUS. And that this division between respectability politics and confrontation is far older than either Obama, or West. It will continue well after both (and you and I) are pushing daisies.
Who knew this dynamic was still at play....
Fortunately I do not believe people on a website when they tell me all Blacks love a person in particular. Then again...I want to understand why we still have this dynamic happening 100 + years after Dubois seminal work on African liberation, not just throw people under the bus.
Oh and making equivalences between a republican and West just put a smile only face. It is literally hilarious
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)And if it wasnt for that blunt reaction to President Barack Obama after his 18-minute valediction to Trayvon Martin, Wests talk-radio partner, Tavis Smiley, might have taken the prize when he declared the speech as weak as pre-sweetened Kool-Aid, via tweet.
They used Trayvon's death to attack the President. You call this truth?
I am truly appalled that you would agree with their statements, or maybe you do not know what has been said. Please understand what has been said and why the black community, DOES NOT LIKE THEM.
Cha
(297,277 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)?
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)when he was putting together his community policing task force. They participated in that process.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)started at the local level, e.g. body cams, training, community collaboration, data collection at the federal level etc. Sorry I can't think of all the strategies but there were several more.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)data collection? community collaboration with what Internal Affairs, my former city Minneapolis has had that for years it simply gets stocked with police supporters, training sorry you can not 'train' bigotry away no none of those will work
iMO 2 things will work jail sentences for officers and hitting folks were it hurts or IoW $$$$$$$$$$$$$ lot's of them
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and implementation. One of the things that is being pushed right now is training in things like implicit bias. The major media did not cover this since well... it is boring policy.
Most of it will take some time to fully implement and goes beyond just body cams... though they are recommended as a national standard.
As to what you said about money and accountability... the latter was a whole subset of the document.
I shan't give you a link to my coverage since I have come to realize that policy coverage does not belong on DU, but I recommend you google Policing in the 21st Century, and after you download it, brew yourself some coffee, kick your feet up and well... read it. It is best to be informed in what is in there, especially if you seek to implement local reforms. It is a matter of knowing what is in there that matters here.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)jail time for LEO's who brutalize people and lawsuits which cost are sort of warm fuzzies to give the appearance of doing something when in reality everything is the same ole same ole
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)but we will see prosecutions, we are starting to. We need to see a lot more.
There are things happening at the state level as well. For example California just made grand juries a no-no for Officer Involved Shootings, As I said, I do not post our coverage any longer but some of the issues are starting to get implemented.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)as a policy matter. I know the CA bills came from the pressure from many young and very committed people. Hell, they put it in a bill, I kid you not, that you can film the police. The fact that it had to be done is worrisome, but has been signed by the governor.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... they can't be sooooooooooo
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Why isn't he being pressured about the killings and mysterious jailhouse deaths? He has the Bully Pulpit and could make a lot of noise and put pressure on Democratic Governors like the one in Missouri. The guy's a Democrat for gawds sake. Jay Nixon, what the hell has that guy done?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)very quietly because that's his style. He's rather you badmouth him about the stuff you think he's not doing that he's actually doing.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)It's been over a year and I don't see very much changing...wondered why. You don't know either.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)and complaining that you haven't seen change about an issue that has been with us for 400 years - the killing of black bodies. I wish local police departments would not hire any white males on their police forces because I consider them extremely dangerous to black bodies. But is that realistic? No. We did get body cameras. We did get community policing boards at the local level. We are getting criminal justice reform. So yeah there has been some movement. But remember PBO is in an environment where he and his team are trying to save the lives of black people while white America is constantly denigrating and findings news way to foment violence against the first African American president. I find the whining frustrating when I know his life is in constant danger.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)I think you need to step away from the keyboard.
Damn!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it was activists from all kinds of places.
I should know... I read both the draft and final document... as usual, those articles do not belong here.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)pertained to BLM
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)or rather multiple rooms.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)So he had a meeting with a variety of activists but nothing specific to BLM? Well. So we can't say that certain things were said or actions taken.
Or were there.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)around the country.
I just don't bother with our policy coverage anymore. Right now looking at poverty and well... climate change.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Your recent article on poverty and climate change was good. I look forward to reading more...and as you say it's all political.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)on how we abandoned Kyoto. Yeah, yeah, old... but relevant.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I have, and he doesn't hate Obama, he just believes that Obama is a tool of the neo-liberal conservative capitalists who want to bring the workers of this country, and the world down.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)West realized he was not going to be part of PBO very tight very small inner circle. I do not recall who wrote the article about this but it was a well-respected AA journalist. What it sounds like. West felt rejected, his feelings were hurt and as a result he went ballistic with his buddy Tavis Smiley.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Yep:
http://www.dsausa.org/
West has said some awful things about Obama, and I'm not a fan, but a candidate can't choose who endorses them.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)'Nuff said
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Dr. Tyson http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121550/cornel-wests-rise-fall-our-most-exciting-black-scholar-ghost and here's the critique of Dr. Tyson written by Glenn Ford http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121550/cornel-wests-rise-fall-our-most-exciting-black-scholar-ghost
Just a little side note. As an African American growing up in the fifties and sixties I notice skin tone. During that period less or more color determined to a large extent access to resources and power. I think it is interesting that all the AA men on both sides of the argument are light or fair skinned. West, Dyson, Glen Ford, Obama. It means something but no one is willing to talk about it. Maybe it will happen in the next 20 years or so.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)SamKnause
(13,107 posts)I respect and admire Dr. West and Senator Sanders.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)not the kind of guy who associates with a mainstream electable candidate/nominee
sibelian
(7,804 posts)SO not in with the in-crowd....
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Nor do we want their endorsements.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)CORNEL WEST: You can't talk about wealth and inequality, you can't talk about education, you can't talk about massive unemployment and under employment and you can't talk about drones being dropped on people in other parts of the world without talking about white supremacy and its ways in which it operates. It doesn't have to be overt. The president is right about that.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/22/cornel_west_on_obama_the_first_black_president_has_become_the_first_niggerized_black_president.html
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Without hesitation there's only one candidate that will fight the economic class war being waged against the poor and middle class...
And that's Bernie Sanders..
b.durruti
(102 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,069 posts)Using a so-called "Poverty Tour" to hawk books and DVDs establishes his love for the very "capitalism" that is railed against in his media appearances.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)Give Professor Cornel West this much: in the pantheon of presidential insults, global George Zimmerman really is quite a gem.
And if it wasnt for that blunt reaction to President Barack Obama after his 18-minute valediction to Trayvon Martin, Wests talk-radio partner, Tavis Smiley, might have taken the prize when he declared the speech as weak as pre-sweetened Kool-Aid, via tweet.
Post 119
http://thegrio.com/2013/07/23/cornel-west-tavis-smiley-criticism-of-president-obama-devolves-into-pot-shots/
Obama: "Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago"
In some of his most extensive comments on U.S. race relations since entering the White House, President Obama on Friday gave a very personal perspective of the shooting of 17-year-old African-American Trayvon Martin and the subsequent trial of George Zimmerman, offering an explanation for why the case has created so much anxiety within the African-American community.
"When Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said this could've been my son. Another way of saying that is, Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago," Mr. Obama said in an unexpected appearance in the White House briefing room, where reporters were gathered to question White House spokesman Jay Carney. (Watch his full remarks in the video above)
"When you think about why in the African-American community, at least, there's a lot of pain around what happened here, it's important to recognize the African-American community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and history that doesn't go away."
More http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago/
I love you BRDS.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Didn't see THAT coming.
You again?
Are you following me?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)???
Cha
(297,277 posts)And..
"Cornel West and Tavis Smiley do a disservice to African Americans"
snip//
That is why it pains me to say that Smiley and West have let me down. Sure, I'm not really anyone important to them, but I represent a generation of African-American men who looked up to West and Smiley only to see them damage their legacies by engaging in embarrassing public roasts of President Obama.
I've looked up to Smiley and West since I was a teenager, gathering an appreciation for race relations and my own personal understanding my place in this country. I've always dreamed of having even a fraction of their respective impacts on American discourse. So I can't help but be disappointed when I see these two men relegated to bickering, insult-tossing self-parodies, especially when it comes to discussing the president.
snip//
When I was in college, I wanted to grow up to be Cornel West or Tavis Smiley. They had that sort of influence on me and millions of other young black Americans. Now, I see the way they're conducting themselves and I just feel sad about the opportunities they've wasted by letting pettiness and pride overshadow their desire to effect actual change.
Perhaps, Smiley and West can look at the recent backlash aimed in their direction and try to scale back the personal attacks. Perhaps, they can really lead deeper discussions about Obama's presidency and what it means for black America. But until that happens, they'll still be letting us down.
More.. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/26/cornel-west-tavis-smiley-disservice-african-americans
And, a huge disservice to themselves.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Can you not cut the president some slack, I ask? Think of what he faced. What did you expect? "I worked to get him elected," he says, almost indignant. "And I would do it again because the alternative was so much worse. But at the same time, I have to be able to tell the truth. I thought he was going to be a dyed-in-the-wool liberal rather than a weak centrist. I thought he would actually move towards healthcare with a public option. I thought he was going to try to bail out homeowners as he bailed out banks. I thought he would try to hit the issue of poverty head-on."
He and Obama, the first-time candidate, talked. And then West attended 65 events drumming up support. "He talked about Martin Luther King over and over again as he ran. King died fighting not just against poverty but against carpet-bombing in Vietnam; the war crimes under Nixon and Kissinger. You can't just invoke Martin Luther King like that and not follow through on his priorities in some way. I knew he would have rightwing opposition, but he hasn't tried. When he came in, he brought in Wall Street-friendly people Tim Geithner, Larry Summers and made it clear he had no intention of bailing out homeowners, supporting trade unions. And he hasn't said a mumbling word about the institutions that have destroyed two generations of young black and brown youth, the new Jim Crow, the prison industrial complex. It's not about race. It is about commitment to justice. He should be able to say that in the last few years, with the shift from 300,000 inmates to 2.5 million today, there have been unjust polices and I intend to do all I can. Maybe he couldn't do that much. But at least tell the truth. I would rather have a white president fundamentally dedicated to eradicating poverty and enhancing the plight of working people than a black president tied to Wall Street and drones."
Unsurprisingly, he and team Obama no longer speak. "They say I'm un-American."
....
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/may/13/cornel-west-they-say-i-am-unamerican
PREACH IT BROTHER!
MerryBlooms
(11,770 posts)policy wonk.
I'm okay with his Sanders endorsement.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)I like Bernie, but Cornell West's endorsement adds nothing. West went off the deep end a long time ago.
ismnotwasm
(41,988 posts)Oh wait
punguin54
(47 posts)I am so looking forward to the dnc debates. Bernie is honest to a fault. Hillary cannot keep her facts straight. I would put my money on the side of honesty any day of the week.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Cha
(297,277 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)very ahem, revealing.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)instead she gets Michael Eric Dyson, a self-serving neoliberal opportunist of the highest order.
The heavyweight Democrat has a robust campaign machine with political recognition, financial access, and unrivaled experience, her role in the presidential race is a solid one. Shes qualified, determined, brilliant, and pragmatic and shes keeping her eye on the Black base. With many high profile grassroots pro-Black activists publicly questioning her commitment to Black Liberation, she knows shell need Black foot soldiers with more reach and validity firmly in her corner.
Dyson is a good fit. He has the connections and platform without the threat. Cornel West is a threat. A few choice words about Clintons ties to mass incarceration and the Black base starts to look for other political options.
To me, Dysons article was a strategic maneuver a preemptive setup thats weak-kneed at best, and betrayal at worst. Dyson positioned himself as a respectable Black savior attuned to the revolutionary vibe, but deeply invested in capitalist/political infrastructure. Cornel West is his arch-villain, a fallen angel suffocating in the clutches of a demented satanic-like possession, while Dyson is a deliverer of reasonable truth and justice, even when, with closer inspection, his words ring shallow.
http://blackmillennials.com/2015/04/21/about-that-dyson-article/
...
...
There will be a moment of reckoning when President Obama leaves office. White feminists will become the new media darlings in preparation for Hillary Clintons presidential run, and Obama will no longer be the site of exploration where many black people grapple with what real black political power looks like situated within a white supremacist structure. During that moment, identity politics and neoliberal agendas won't be able to masquerade as collective advancement, and we will climb out of this rabbit hole where progressive blackness seems to be defined by proximity to the African-American man in the White House.
And when that day comes, Id be willing to place a bet that Cornel West will still be standing in his truth: scholar, activist and lover of black people, even when too many of us didnt love him back.
Kirsten West Savali is a cultural critic and senior writer for The Root and was awarded a 2015 Harry Frank Guggenheim Fellowship. Her provocative commentary explores the intersections of race, social justice, religion, feminism, politics and pop culture.
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2015/04/michael_eric_dyson_s_cornel_west_essay_was_a_hit_piece_wrapped_in_scholarly.2.html
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Hillary would never accept an endorsement from someone who called Obama a "niggerized Black man."
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)we cannot forget the need to look at PEOPLE, regardless of their outward appearance and their preferences.
We need to find common ground if we are ALL to move forward.
dougolat
(716 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Judging by the endorsements, Hillary has MED (according to you), Marcia Fudge, Corey Booker, Kamala Harris and a slew of other black politicians, organizations and universities.
And Bernie has Cornell West. So I guess if you're going to start slamming and sliming everybody black that supports Hillary, you've definitely got your work cut out for you.
Cha
(297,277 posts)snip//
When African-American friends defended the president, he went in on them. West called MSNBCs Perry a liar and a fraud, claimed Sharpton was the bona fide house negro of the Obama plantation, and attacked the Michael Dysons and others whove really prostituted themselves intellectually in a very, very ugly and vicious way.
Its true that as Dysons TNR piece bemoans the nasty ad hominem nature of Wests attacks on Obama, as well as on him and his colleagues, he gave almost as good as he got, first praising West as the most exciting black scholar ever, then charting his intellectual decline. His greatest opponent isnt Obama, Sharpton, Harris-Perry, or me, the Georgetown scholars article concludes. It is the ghost of a self that spits at him from his own mirror.
snip//
But thats part of what stung me when he turned on Obama in such ad hominem ways, as you wrote in your piece. First, he tears into Obama for appealing to white people and reaching out to white people when that used to be a core of Wests politics, too and then he harps on the fact that the president is half white, too close to his white brothers and Jewish brothers, allegedly afraid of free black men. The trademark generosity of spirit was gone entirely, and we were left with a kind of racial essentialism and borderline anti-Semitism, with the Jewish brothers crack. Whos the real Cornel West? What happened? It was shocking. And I didnt feel like people addressed it enough at the time.
snip//
Now there are legitimate criticisms to be made, and Ive made them. And there are white folks who criticize him, and its not from racism. However, the structural features of his presidency, the fact that this man is assaulted in so many ways and methods that assassinate his character he has not been physically, thank God, assassinated but there have been such rhetorical assaults on him. Its unprecedented that a president didnt automatically get the debt ceiling raised. Unprecedented that 47 senators would write our enemy compromising national security; its an unconsciously racist motivation, that I feel safe in saying. People see it, black and white
Much More..
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/22/calling_obama_a_global_george_zimmerman_no_no_michael_eric_dyson_sounds_off_on_cornel_west_obama_his_critics/
Yes, cornel west hates President Obama.. starting when he didn't attend tavis smiley's Black State of the Union and offered to send Michelle Obama instead.
snip//
Tavis Smiley was never an ardent supporter of President Obama. That of course is his right. His antagonism of the president during the 2008 Democratic Primaries hit a crescendo when the president did not attend Smileys State Of The Black Union forum in New Orleans even as Hillary Clinton did. In a further display of uncalled for arrogance, he rejected then Senator Obamas request to have Michelle Obama represent him at the forum. Further he castigated Senator Obama for distancing himself from Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and for not attending African American events Smiley deemed he should attend. The height of this mans arrogance, lack of scope, and self-serving hyperbole makes him an unfit spokesman for the cause of the poor and disenfranchised. That Dr. Cornel West has allowed himself to be Tavis Smileys sidekick speaks poorly of his judgment.
More http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/24/1164307/-Naivet-of-Tavis-Smiley-Cornel-West-Attack-On-Obama-Danger-To-Poor-Blacks
oasis
(49,389 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)Bleh, please don't accept his endorsement Bernie.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I don't see how anyone takes him seriously.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)since I posted this OP. What a diverse bunch there is here. At least this helps me figure out who are the real LIBERALS, who are the third wayers, and who are the fakers.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Based upon the responses in this thread, what sentiments help you make these determinations?
emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)These kids and their modern contraptions...
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)And no, I haven't forgotten what he has said about Obama in the past, either.
Cha
(297,277 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Can you provide me with some proof of that, or is it just an off the cuff remark?
Honestly, I don't remember any racist remarks that Brother West ever made. Perhaps if you could educate me as to where and when, I would surely appreciate it. Please don't use any of the remarks he made against Obama, because they prove nothing. He was merely voicing his disagreement with Obama's policies. Yes it was rather strong, but that is all it was.
So as soon as you tell me where and when, then I will believe you
Thank You for your prompt response.
Cha
(297,277 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)You CAN, in fact have this ugly spiel. People do not have to believe it though. That is our right, as informed people.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Cornel West has a great following and a great record of deep deep insights into our culture.
His opinion should not be discounted so easily especially when it comes so CLOSELY on the heels of the group-chant about how white people need to listen to voices of black people.
Another example of puke-worthy hypocrisy.
romanic
(2,841 posts)but I must (unfortunately) agree with your post, hypocrisy indeed.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)108vcd
(91 posts)for a variety of reasons, and has spoken in favor
just like the rest of us
i think he will go down as one of the better presidents of this country, but he certainly isn't without criticism
I can tell you that #blacklivesmatter folks respect Mr West, more than Obama
Cha
(297,277 posts)iwannaknow
(210 posts)Here's the Terrible Mistake Progressives Must Not Make
by Robert Reich
...
The main event at the Netroots Nation conference in Phoenix, Arizona last weekend was a Presidential Town Hall featuring one-on-one discussions between journalist and undocumented American Jose Antonio Vargas and presidential candidates Governor Martin OMalley and Senator Bernie Sanders.
It was upstaged by #?BlackLivesMatter activists who demanded to be heard.
Its impossible to overcome widening economic inequality in America without also dealing with the legacy of racial inequality.
And it is impossible to overcome racial inequality without also reversing widening economic inequality.
They are not the same but they are intimately related.
Racial inequalities are baked into our political and economic system. Police brutality against black men and women, mass incarceration disproportionately of blacks and Latinos, housing discrimination that has resulted in racial apartheid across the nation, and voter suppression in the forms of gerrymandered districts, voter identification requirements, purges of names from voter registration lists, and understaffed voting stations in black neighborhoods all reveal deep structures of discrimination that undermine economic inequality.
Black lives matter.
But it would be a terrible mistake for the progressive movement to split into a Black lives matter movement and an economic justice movement.
This would only play into the hands of the right.
...
Let's not let the right win by dividing us along race/class lines.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Oops, I see he really was tossed under and backed over many times. Very sad.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Or that Obama was Jenny G in black face. You're absolutely right. Why would any liberal tolerate racist language like that to wars Obama - whether it came from Cornel West, Allan West or David Duke?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)That is part of a struggle among black people that you simply would do well to follow the advice of others and listen.
Your opinion on the subject is without sufficient background, experience, substance and standing.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)West is a racist bigot. He's vile.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I am 99.9% sure you have never listened to him or read his work.
You can lie about it and who would know?
Except for those of us who KNOW that Cornel West is none of those things. And if you claim he is, we KNOW you don't know jack shit.
It's funny to even hear... if you know that is.