2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBlaming Hillary.....
....for BLM disrupting a Sanders event in Seattle......just leaves me shaking my head. Do you realize how silly that sounds???....and even sillier, to suggest disrupting her appearances in retaliation? OMG!
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Cha
(297,089 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I believe it.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm going later.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Might not be as strong as some need.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)That can block radioactive transmissions.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)To conclude otherwise is just tinfoil. Right?
BooScout
(10,406 posts)...had one iota of something to do with what happened in Seattle today is wrong. EOM.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)But, that doesn't mean he was innocent.
Dirty tricks operations are always a step or two removed from the top.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Florencenj2point0
(435 posts)and easy to manipulate. Whatever Hillary wants they just "step and fetchit"?
still_one
(92,116 posts)If you have substance that the Hillary campaign is behind this, then present it, otherwise you are just talking out of your ass
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)still_one
(92,116 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)pleasant.
still_one
(92,116 posts)I think this was a few passionate people who realized it was counter productive what they did
If BLM has a rally to discuss abuses on African Americans in America, and someone tried to take over the rally, to talk about an entirely different subject, I have no doubt the organizers would be very disappointed
If it was a town hall, it would be understandable because town halls are open forums, however,
This was a rally to discuss Medicare and Social Security
Hydra
(14,459 posts)As far as I know, this was a sanctioned and utterly unmistakable act on their part. Makes sense with everything that happened at Netroots and otherwise.
still_one
(92,116 posts)The rally in question was specifically to address Medicare and Social Security
Hydra
(14,459 posts)That have been clarified by this one. Tactical error, you might say.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)See the first response on this thread.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)who started the Ferguson protests that I have come to know for over a year now.
So yes, Hillary gets the blame.
Same way Bernie would get the blame if his supporters followed HER around announcing they were shutting down her event.
Very bad tactics
Once I saw it at Netroots Nation, it was clear.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)she just mutters clenis clenis clenis and that is her proof.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)allowed on this forum, especially against someone who fought the far right YOU are accusing me of being a member of, I take it, on behalf of the Clintons for years.
Is that all you have to defend these despicable tactics, to lash out at those you disagree with?
Now back to reality. Will these protesters do this to Hillary, HAVE they disrupted a Hillary event? No?
Then get back to us when they do, and your personal attacks only confirm my opinion and that of a growing number of people re the way this campaign is going.
dsc
(52,155 posts)you stated that the three women on that stage were supporters of Hillary with no proof whatsoever. Frankly I don't see how that is different from the tapes about Clinton murdering half of Arkansas.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Get you order in quick before it's too late
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)No answer. Won't answer that question. Lots of people have asked as it is the first thing that occurred to people, considering the last campaign, which an awful lot of people have not forgotten, including AAs, when the Hillary campaign tried similar tactics.
Yes, to quote you 'if it quacks like a duck' etc.
dsc
(52,155 posts)can you tell me where and when you did this? I would like a direct link to you having done this.
Hope you're not holding your breath.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)Your post stated that the three ladies were supporters of Clinton. Words have meaning even when you are the one who has typed them.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)at the NRN event, so did many, many people. I got answers to all of my questions, except that one.
Show me where I said I asked these particular three women.
But I will, you can be sure of that.
dsc
(52,155 posts)in point of fact, the op mentions Seattle.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Facts just gets in the way of blaming Hillary for all the troubles in the world.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)......this particular poster has claimed inside knowledge of a serious national issue. And both times has had to back pedal. That 15 minutes so many seek, seems so elusive.
What I love most about the roly poly brigade is how behind the times they are regarding today's methods of communication.
Suits me fine, and I hope things remain that way.
Cha
(297,089 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)tell her supporters this is only harming HER.
Seriesly?!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but gosh it's just serendipity or something
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Conspiracy theories that it's all her fault that a Sander's appearance was disrupted by BLM? Or conspiracy theories that BLM is now working for Hillary?
Last time I checked, BLM was working for Black Lives Matter.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)the rest seems confabulation on your part
BooScout
(10,406 posts)If someone is going to post silly conspiracy theories, it's my duty to save the world and stock up on tin foil!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)To say Hillary should be blamed for any disruption without any proof results in smearing Hillary, if you have proof Hillary is responsible for any of the interruptions then give proof.
msrizzo
(796 posts)Since the only people who believe this are those that hate her anyway.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)discontinue your associations with them. People who 'hate' are not part of my circle of friends or acquaintances.
Anyhow, it appears BLM has apologized for what they refer to as a 'an error at the helm today'.
The group who did this started a new FB page yesterday. Considering that the real BLM movement has a huge online presence, there appears to be no reason for them to start another FB page.
It IS harming her. Last time it harmed her but with a lot of 'explaining' the moderator of NRN who received huge backlash from across the political spectrum for his part in the 'event', people chose to forget it, though suspicions remained had this not happened today, most people would have moved on.
Now, once again, people are rethinking their willingness to overcome their initial reactions and with the apology from BLM, it would be best for Hillary to distance herself publicly from today's event. But she's not my candidate, so not my problem.
House of Roberts
(5,168 posts)She has Secret Service protection. At The Ft. Lauderdale Urban League event if you left the hall between speeches, you couldn't get back in until the next speech was over. People that ran out to get a drink were kept out by the SS because Hillary hadn't left the building. They missed hearing Bernie speak there, and the event ran long, causing him not to be able to stay and do a presser.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)You're a wise person!
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)their candidate?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Let us know when they stop attacking Hillary's most serious opponent.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)her campaign as they have her most serious opponent's?
It's not hard to get past the SS, did you know that?
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)BLM hasn't protested HRC so they must be Hillary tools.
Something is missing in this equation, methinks.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)This will protect you >>>
mcar
(42,296 posts)Thanks.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)it may seem to you, all over Social Media, not much anyone but HILLARY can do about that.
All she has to do is to state that this is not the way to get attention for this most serious issues and that her campaign condemns it.
Bernie handled it beautifully, btw, and it appears to be working FOR him, so that is good.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)That will impress everyone. Taking to twitter to tell the world that BLM is being directed by Hillary Clinton.....and all so she can 'get' Bernie!
zappaman
(20,606 posts)mcar
(42,296 posts)It must be true.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Otherwise we are to believe they are just reading and never ever actually participating.
Employing the old Rovian tactic of stating an unsubstantiated talking point because it's more important to believe a lie than find out an uncomfortable truth.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)They haven't protested Walker...which can ONLY mean that Walker and Hillary are conspiring to beat Bernie? There are so many possibilities that we could come up with and NONE of them require a shred of evidence.
It is made very clear though, that everyone is a potential threat to Bernie, but none so much as Hillary therefore, it must be Hillary, because it's all about winning the POTUS seat and nothing to do with the BLM movement, because their black lives matter messaging is simply a diversion and political maneuvering for the upcoming political primary vote
mcar
(42,296 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)That anytime people speak out over blatant bullshit being directly shoved at Bernie, they get this equally bullshit, passive agressive 'do they think this is helping' talking point thrown back at them.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and yes Hillary as a former FLOTUS get's 24/7 Secret Service protection
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Actually O'Malley was interrupted longer than Bernie was at Netroots meeting.
mcar
(42,296 posts)But no, it must be something else.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)After speeches by U.S. Rep Adam Smith and Seattle City Councilmember Kshama Sawant, a handful of Black Lives Matter protesters took the stage, first demanding to speak, then demanding silence from the crowd. As some urged protesters to let the senator speak, one activist on stage said they were proving they were white supremacist liberals.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/black-lives-matter-protesters-shut-down-bernie-sanders-rally/
and more here
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/250667-protesters-interrupt-bernie-sanders-rally
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Church, which as many AAs said at the time, showed that she did not even KNOW there was a movement which formed out of the Ferguson protests.
Strange isn't it, that a couple of people from the literally thousands who are involved in this movement, are not at all concerned about Hillary's total lack of knowledge or her willingness to LISTEN to the outrage that is still ongoing towards her for that revelation.
As many of those who were in the Church and from the movement stated at the time, 'she only comes here when she wants our votes'.
I can certainly link to many of the sites where AAs expressed their outrage, and yet, here we have a few claiming to represent all AAs, totally not concerned with ONE candidate, but fixated on the one with the best and longest record on Civil Rights.
Something doesn't add up here. And THAT is the general takeaway from this.
So maybe the Hillary campaign needs to distance themselves from this before they do it again and again they will be blamed.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)on my phone for some reason. Did Sanders speak with the women, or try to respond to them? From what I've read he walked off the stage. It may have been more chaotic than I'm imagining but I don't understand why he doesn't stay and show some patience and leadership. Now he may have tried, I don't know, but reports say he quit. He seems to wash his hands of things unpleasant to him.
ETA: It would probably be a good idea for Sanders to hire a private security detail. It's not unheard of to have security during the primaries.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Blm targets obama also but are not able to get near him because of security.
Hillary probably has similar.
Sanders is easier to get to.
Cha
(297,089 posts)snip//
The poll saw increases in the number of blacks, whites and Hispanics who felt more changes were needed. In 2014, only 39 percent of whites said more needed to be done. In 2015, that number jumped to 53 percent. For blacks, the numbers increased from 79 percent to 86 percent, and for Hispanics, 54 percent to 70 percent.
Pew surveyed 2,002 adults between July 14 and July 20, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cell phones.
A Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, asked the same question as the Pew Research Center and got very similar results.
The Pew poll comes after a year of heightened Black Lives Matter activism, including numerous rallies, die-ins and acts of civil disobedience. A Gallup poll released Tuesday showed comparable results.
More..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/poll-black-lives-matter-activists_55c24a2de4b0d9b28f0525e9?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&kvcommref=mostpopular&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000051
Boo, you have to consider the source of those acting out in such a manner.
mcar
(42,296 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....really think that "her" involvement would remain a secret if it was true?
Sadly some just can't take responsibility for the lack of/weak policies of their candidate.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)even since way back when....
:large
George II
(67,782 posts)....for an undetermined period of time (and undetermined reason), then when he returned he went up to Burlington Vermont which, at the time, was rife with racial injustice and discord.
Meanwhile Hillary turned 18, then 19, any beyond and eventually became First Lady of Arkansas, helping her husband turn that state blue for a while. Of course, the rest is history.
So, nice graphic, but I'd put Hillary Clinton's record against Bernie Sanders' record anytime.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)plus bernie has the added feature of being for income equality for all races and not being beholden to his corporate tax cheatin' donors
George II
(67,782 posts)....from the mid-60s until he was elected to Congress in 1989, just what was his record on racial injustice and racial equality in a town of less than 40,000 which is virtually mono-racial?
He could very easily have stayed in Brookly NY where there really WERE serious racial issues and pursued that perceived record that everyone talks about, but that was not a priority for him, eh?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)so i tried to provide a comprehensive overview of his outstanding record. i am sure his senatorial acts are available if you want to read them. that was not the initial issue however.
George II
(67,782 posts)....that was 50+ years ago. Other than vague subjectivity, I haven't seen much since.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)have a nice evening...
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)kitchen sink.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Cha
(297,089 posts)Finally someone who is making sense!
Cha
(297,089 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)For keeping it real.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)happens to her. Then it will be clear that it is not Hillary supporters (not her or her campaign itself, I don't think anyone really believes that).
On the other hand, if it does happen to her then odds are it is BLM.
She really should speak out against these disruptions. She is a much more tempting target since she is the leading candidate.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Do you want Hillary to hold his hand and make it all better for him?
Tell the Bern to man-up and deal with it.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)...because Hillary Clinton is Desperate because she is losing....
BooScout
(10,406 posts)In the 50's and 60's to Bernie's consistent teens sure do convince me she's losing.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Soon as they compare Clinton to Sanders....bye bye Hillary.... Just like in 2008...
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Or go tell it on Twitter! That will make folks take you seriesly!
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)I hope not because it doesn't further dialogue.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Why the need for six, and more? if EVERYONE will fall for Sanders after the first debate, why the desperation to have more than six?
Oh, and BTW, Sanders is no Obama...
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Repetition is key and Clinton/DNC know that.
Some people might not watch the 1st debate. People will talk. Noting
the obvious differences between a real Democrat, Sanders, and Hillary.
People will tune into the ore debates.
DNC taking a play right out of the republican play book - cheat as much as possible.
And you are absolutely right - Sanders is no Obama... Sanders is a FDR candidate right out of the box.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)I think they can change things when the difference in polls between the candidates is less than 10%
But to think that Sanders will jump 40% plus with debates? that highly unlikely. I mean what do you think will happen? People who watch debates are already familiar with the candidates platforms. There won't be any bombshells thrown. Most people watch just to affirm what they already believe.
And anyway, my post was a response to your ridiculous claim that Hillary is losing. When called on the absurdity of your claim, you bring up debates which are months away.
At this point, now, TODAY Saying that Hillary is losing, when she's 40% plus ahead, is just laughable. As laughable as claiming that what happened today was "A political hit job"
Please
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)If they are ignoring her and attacking everyone else... what do you think people will think? You'll have conspiracy theories galore. And a lot of people will pledge not to vote for Hillary.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)and of course, blaming the Clintons
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... who have been blaming Obama for everything since 2009 are a lot of the same people who now blame Hillary for everything?
Just coincidence, I'm sure.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)That quite a few of these people wind up morphing into Name Removed after their moment in the sun. I wonder why?
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ericson00
(2,707 posts)I mean I bet Hillary's as guilty over this as the people Starr witch hunted 20 years ago over a failed land deal...
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I would put nothing beyond the Clinton "War Room."
riversedge
(70,182 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Sad to see democrats going down this road.
Right out of the hard right playbook.